Latest ads
-
🔒 NordVPN Premium – 3 Months- hrdilshan
- Updated:
-
🚀 Microsoft Office 365 Pro Plus – Lifetime Access! 🚀- hrdilshan
- Updated:
-
Colombo YEYE 3 in 1 Instant Coffee Mix 50 Sachet- Romeshka
- Updated:
-
Colombo Red Hat Certified System Administrator (RHCSA) - RHEL 10- Sanjeewani95
- Updated:
REPLIES TO THE MOST COMMON QUESTIONS ASKED BY NON-MUSLIMS
- Thread starter hydfun
- Start date
nadeeshaF said:Being a fool is better than someone who approves peadophilia as you are doing now!
Cops sure would be interested in people like you, I'm sure you are aware of the recent campaigns in Sri Lanka talking out against child sex. Yet here we have people like you who are still of the belief that child sex is Ok, because some 5th century man bonked a kid
It doesn't matter whether she has reached puberty or not, she WAS 9, and still a child. There are no IF conditions, the legal definition of a child according to the UN:
“A child means every human being below the age of eighteen years unless, under the law applicable to the child, majority is attained earlier.”
Article 1 – Convention on the Rights of the Child (adopted by the UN in 1989 and ratified by the UK in 1991). (http://www.nspcc.org.uk/Inform/resourcesforprofessionals/InformationBriefings/definitionofachild_wda59396.html)
See that Mr. I like peadophilia? AAysha was still a child, and your prophet was a peadophile.
ask you gramdama or someone in her age when did she married...
people in old days married so early..
And by the way, think you should learn some islamic history properly before commentong on them.. prophet muhammed(pbuh) married Aysha (raliyallahu thala anhu) when she was 9 yrs.. but she was kept in her uwn house with her dad abubakar (raliyallahu thala anhu) until she grow up in to a women..
okey.. now lets see this point... when a man and a women gets married.. the women has the full rights to leave the man for a devorce if she dont like to live with him.. Aysha (raliyallahu thala anhu) lived with prophet muhammed for more than 9 or 10 yrs.. so if aysha (raliyallahu thala anhu) doest like the marriage she could probly left muhammed (pbuh). why din't she do so..
muhammed (pbuh) is not the one asked abubakar(raliyallahu thala anhu) to giv him her dauter to him.. its Aysha (raliyallahu thala anhu)'s farther abubakar(raliyallahu thala anhu) who saasked muhammed(pbuh) to marry his daugter.. will a farther do a bad thing for her child... even if he does somthing like dat.. aysha(raliyallahu thala anhu) has the full rights to lleave muhammed(pbuh) after she gets to know dat she as undergone an unfairness.. the islamic law says a woman can leave a man when she doesn't like him.. this fits to prophet and his wife as well..
malkavi said:Mata nam penne dan methana agam pracharaya karana wedak yanwa....
machan amuthuwen me aagam prachaaraya karanna one nehe ban.
e hinda ehema hitanna epa. me forum eka religiouse hinda hemotama podui. ape ewun islam gena daanne thamange denageneema pinisay. anika me agama prachaaraya karanna aluthin hedichcha ekak nemei ne neda
fzlhmt said:machan amuthuwen me aagam prachaaraya karanna one nehe ban.
e hinda ehema hitanna epa. me forum eka religiouse hinda hemotama podui. ape ewun islam gena daanne thamange denageneema pinisay. anika me agama prachaaraya karanna aluthin hedichcha ekak nemei ne neda
me loke koheda ban aluthin hadichcha agama thiyenne.....heheh
ow ow....umba kiyan ekath aththa thamai... relegious forum ekane me....
RajNOX said:
None of this justifies mohammed's actions, least of all his lust for a child of 9. Do you want me to give you the definition of a peadophile? He fits bill adequately. HE WAS A PEADOPHILE. I can see that you are not denying that.
What does it matter what people did in that time period or what the cultural norms were back then? Mohammed was supposedly a prophet of god, not a mere person so to speak.
He should have known, or at least been informed by god that it is morally wrong to have sex with a child. He should have set an example, changed the culture, not stick by it and act like every desert bushman. Alas, he did. He behaved like all other people of the time, but that is not acceptable to me since he was a prophet of god.
His actions and words should have a timeless value, but they don't. Civilized cultures today do not accept adults having sex with kids, peadophilia is a criminal offence. Tell me, why is that Mohammed as a prophet of god failed to realise that?
malkavi said:me loke koheda ban aluthin hadichcha agama thiyenne.....heheh
ow ow....umba kiyan ekath aththa thamai... relegious forum ekane me....
anna kollo therum gaththane. elakiri
aluthin hedichca aagama nam nehe thamai but aluthin kattiya recruit karana aya kochchara innavada. anna evati virudda wenna one.
Salli deela wena aagam walata harawaa ganna ekata thamai virudhdha venna one banz
RajNOX said:
Very good answers buddy.. even u explain so many tiems.. they dont want to know or clear the misconcepts abt it.. they just post the bull.... here from their reply & making these topics as arguments n fights.. dats all... If they realy dont like the topics .. best thing is not 2 answer...??? but they always..
fzlhmt said:anna kollo therum gaththane. elakiri
aluthin hedichca aagama nam nehe thamai but aluthin kattiya recruit karana aya kochchara innavada. anna evati virudda wenna one.
Salli deela wena aagam walata harawaa ganna ekata thamai virudhdha venna one banz
ya machan aniwa den wedi hariyak innay salli walata yana un ne
agam walata
oya gollo hadanne islam agama meke genalla promote karanna. mekai machang ek eke hemadeyakma kata karanna puluwan eth jaati wade ati karanne oyala wage aya ekatu wela hemotama islam suit karanne nehe ne mamat hemadama oyalage palliyata yana kenek e yanne islam agama gena hoyannadeviyan kawrut kiyanne manussayekuta jeewitayak hodin heda gahagannai eth oya hema agamakama pujaka waru karanne eyalage bada wada ganna ekai e nisa tamange agama tamanta utum kiyala hitagena wedak ati deyak gena post karanna machang taraha giya nam sorry machang okai aththa ubat tikak hitapan agama kiyala kare bedaganna epa machan ochchara ke gahana uba hariyata dawase agamawat adahanawada ?
milinda serasinghe said:
hahahaa machan kavda ban gaha gatte bena gatte ema kare ne godak kattiya islam agama gena ahana prasna walata answers deela tiyanne
ekai puluwan nam oyath balanna
netuwa machan anith katiya koamda danne ne mama nam mage islam agama hariyata pilipadinawa umba belive karana ekai belive nokarana ekai oyage kematta
thx
THE YOUNG MARRIAGE OF 'AISHA
Mother of the Believers
(radiallahu 'anhaa)
Abdu 'Abd ar-Rahman Robert Squires
Abdu 'Abd ar-Rahman Robert Squires
The marriage of the Prophet Muhammad PBUH to 'Aishah bint Abu Bakr when she was at quite a young age has been the focus of quite a bit of criticism in the West. Unfortunately, in this Neo-Colonialist Age of smart bombs, MTV, CNN and the Big Mac, some of those who profess to be Muslims have themselves become critics. Many Muslims, faced with the juggernaut of allegedly "universal" Western liberal values that have permeated almost everyone around them, sheepishly avoid discussion of such "embarrassing" Islamic issues. It is a keenly true observation that even though the European powers have pulled their colonial armies out of Muslim lands and granted them "independence", an even worse plague continues. This curse is "Colonialism of the Mind" and it is more dangerous since it is much more subtle. Insha'llah, this article will be a contribution to making both Muslims and non-Muslims aware of not only the objective facts regarding the Prophet's PBUH marriage to 'Aishah, but how to understand it in light of Islam and life in the "modern" world.
Regrettably, for those of us trying to spread the truth of Islam in the West, we often have to agree with the Orientalist W. Montgomery Watt when he wrote: "Of all the world's great men none has been so much maligned as Muhammad."1 But here, for a change, were are dealing with something that is an authentic part of Islamic history, not an apocryphal or fabricated event that Westerners have been duped into believing is authentic, such as the so-called "Satanic Verses" incident. That a man in his fifties would marry such a young girl—especially a man who is supposed to be a living example of piety—is not only difficult for many "modern" Westerners to come to terms with, but it has even gone so far as to stir up disgusting "sexual misconduct" charges amongst them. In the face of such criticism, Muslims have not always reacted well. In the past century, when so many Muslims were so "Westoxicated" and ready to monkey Europeans in almost anything, the usual reaction was to deny the sources that reported the alleged "embarrassing problem". To Muslim "modernists", who argued that ONLY a legal ruling found in the Qur'an was Islamically valid, brushing aside this aspect of the Prophet's life was rather easy. They simply denied that it had occurred and attacked the sources which reported it. Fortunately for Muslims, the apologetics of these "Uncle Toms of Islam" has faded into the periphery to a large extent. However, there are still many Muslims out there who try to get around what they see as a problem by ignoring authentic Islamic sources while claiming to be followers of the Ahl as-Sunnah. (which basically means "orthodox Sunni" Muslims, for those unfamiliar Islamic terminology). Many other Muslims possibly wonder whether the story is authentic and how to understand it if it is.
Regrettably, for those of us trying to spread the truth of Islam in the West, we often have to agree with the Orientalist W. Montgomery Watt when he wrote: "Of all the world's great men none has been so much maligned as Muhammad."1 But here, for a change, were are dealing with something that is an authentic part of Islamic history, not an apocryphal or fabricated event that Westerners have been duped into believing is authentic, such as the so-called "Satanic Verses" incident. That a man in his fifties would marry such a young girl—especially a man who is supposed to be a living example of piety—is not only difficult for many "modern" Westerners to come to terms with, but it has even gone so far as to stir up disgusting "sexual misconduct" charges amongst them. In the face of such criticism, Muslims have not always reacted well. In the past century, when so many Muslims were so "Westoxicated" and ready to monkey Europeans in almost anything, the usual reaction was to deny the sources that reported the alleged "embarrassing problem". To Muslim "modernists", who argued that ONLY a legal ruling found in the Qur'an was Islamically valid, brushing aside this aspect of the Prophet's life was rather easy. They simply denied that it had occurred and attacked the sources which reported it. Fortunately for Muslims, the apologetics of these "Uncle Toms of Islam" has faded into the periphery to a large extent. However, there are still many Muslims out there who try to get around what they see as a problem by ignoring authentic Islamic sources while claiming to be followers of the Ahl as-Sunnah. (which basically means "orthodox Sunni" Muslims, for those unfamiliar Islamic terminology). Many other Muslims possibly wonder whether the story is authentic and how to understand it if it is.
THE ISLAMIC EVIDENCE OF 'Aishah'S AGE
Due to the apparent ignorance of many Muslims, possibly due to reading "modernist" apologetic literature like that mentioned above, a look at what the authentic sources of Islam say about the age at which 'Aishah married the Prophet PBUH is in order. This way, before we move on to an analysis of the facts, we will first establish what the authentic Islamic facts are. At this point, it should be mentioned that it is absolutely pointless from an Islamic standpoint to say that the age of 'Aishah is "not found in the Qur'an", since the textual sources of Islam are made up of BOTH the Qur'an and the Sunnah - and the Qur'an tells us that. For those wanting (or needing) to learn more about the status of the Sunnah in Islam, please read An Introduction to the Sunnah and/or The Sunnah and Its Position in Islamic Law. Now in regards to what the authentic Islamic sources actually say, it may come as a disappointment to some "modern" and "cultured" Muslims that there are four ahadith in Saheeh al-Bukhari and three ahadith in Saheeh Muslim which clearly state that 'Aishah was "nine years old" at the time that her marriage was consummated with the Prophet PBUH. These ahadith, with only slight variation, read as follows:
'Aishah, may God be pleased with her, narrated that the Prophet PBUH was betrothed (zawaj) to her when she was six years old and he consummated (nikah) his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years. (Saheeh al-Bukhari, Volume 7, Book 62, Number 64)
Of the four ahadith in Saheeh al-Bukhari, two were narrated from 'Aishah (7:64 and 7:65), one from Abu Hishaam (5:236) and one via 'Ursa (7:88). All three of the ahadith in Saheeh Muslim have 'Aishah as a narrator. Additionally, all of the ahadith in both books agree that the marriage betrothal contract took place when 'Aishah was "six years old", but was not consummated until she was "nine years old". Additionally, a hadeeth with basically the same text (matn) is reported in Sunan Abu Dawood. Needless to say, this evidence is—Islamically speaking—overwhelmingly strong and Muslims who deny it do so only by sacrificing their intellectual honesty, pure faith or both.
This evidence having been established, there doesn't seem much room for debate about 'Aishah's age amongst believing Muslims. Until someone proves that in the Arabic language "nine years old" means something other than "nine years old", then we should all be firm in our belief that she was "nine years old" (as if there's a reason or need to believe otherwise!?!). In spite of these facts, there are still some Muslim authors that have somehow (?) managed to push 'Aishah's age out to as far as "fourteen or fifteen years old" at the time of her marriage to the Prophet. It should come as no surprise, however, that none of them ever offer any proof, evidence or references for their opinions. This can be said with the utmost confidence, since certainly none of them can produce sources more authentic than the hadeeth collections of Imams al-Bukhari and Muslim! Based on the research that I've done, I feel that there is a common source for those who claim that 'Aishah's age was "fourteen or fifteen years old" at the time of the marriage. This source is "The Biographies of Prominent Muslims" which is published in book form, on CD-ROM and is posted in several places on the Internet. Just another example of why going to the sources is important . . .
milinda serasinghe said:
hari machan api aagam prachaaraya karanawa kiyala umbata therenawanam mata hari kanagaatuy e gena. ethakota me forum eke yanne islam gena witharada. anith eka issellath mama kiwwa wage meka open relegious forum ekak. hari ehenam mata meka kiyanna meke buddhist gena thread arinne buddhism prachaaraya karannada. nehene. anika machan dont test our faith. our faith and beleif to god vl remain no one cant change it.
ehinda obage dharmaya oba adahanna mama mage aagama adahannam.
JAYA SRI
WE ALL ARE SRI LANKANS
Similar threads
