What is better: an experiment with winrar winzip and 7zip

coolioWiZ

Well-known member
  • Jul 19, 2007
    1,396
    31
    48
    alpha canis majoris
    mkranga said:
    KBG = 6,825,947 bytes 44.1% Yaaaa....! but
    time 8.05 min eeek.

    Might be another piece from where you got the the other results. :lol:

    KGB is not optimized for general use, It's an experimental format to test the limits of archiving. So you will get an extremly good compression if you can wait for a long time. More compression means more time taken. Same about WinRK.

    Hope you will not misunderstand. :P
     

    mkranga

    Member
    Jul 6, 2007
    508
    14
    0
    http://www.systemr.tk
    coolioWiZ said:
    From where are those data taken ? ! ! Not from Wikipedia as I see. :eek:
    ok ok...

    source = Ranga
    Total 15,454,899 bytes

    RK = 7,170,728 bytes 46%
    Uha = 7,429,575 bytes 48%
    Rar = 7,620,582 bytes 49%
    Alz = 7,776,894 bytes 50%
    Zip = 7,777,067 bytes 50%
    source = http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_compression
    “Globally, the three best methods tested are rk, rar and 7z. WinRK and WinRar are commercial software, 7-zip is free, open source (LGPL licence) and can be used with Linux.”

    Where ever you got that data set, 7z is excluded. That doesn't make a complete test,
    I don’t like rabbit. (You did that, why should I do same again). so don't be a rbt PLS.

    you are just trying to glorify winrar.
    YES.
    I’m enjoying with that. Battle against mighty 7zip and little winrar. Go winrar go….
    This doesn’t mean I am not an open source lover.

    At least you read a page from wikipedia. Do that once a day. It will increase your IQ and logical reasoning power. :P
    :lol:
    DAWASA GANE GANNA IQ PILL EKADA.:lol: ... no thanks. I have good IQ.
    Keep that habit with you rabbit.:lol: ;) :lol:
     

    mkranga

    Member
    Jul 6, 2007
    508
    14
    0
    http://www.systemr.tk
    coolioWiZ said:
    I admit defeat O' mighty WinRar :P
    ena pota nam hoda ne.:shocked: I’ll better be lunch my weapons.:frown:
    f14-detail-weapons-01l.jpg

     

    mkranga

    Member
    Jul 6, 2007
    508
    14
    0
    http://www.systemr.tk
    You got all the cheapest fighters.

    coolioWiZ said:
    If you mean WinRar is like the F 14 you posted, 7Zip is like these below :lol:

    F 35 USA
    070427f4335c200pz2.jpg


    EuroFighter Typhoon Europe (UK Germany)
    typhda4jr2.jpg


    Dassault Rafale France
    av157impod3.jpg


    Su 34 Russia
    naposu344ni7.jpg

    You got all the cheapest fighters.
    It’s ok.
    I’ll change my type.
    Try this before war fog


    new age -> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7026978532619588322

    Transformed -> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8597686993013532431

    IT'S ME.... -> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3921756519706268934
     

    coolioWiZ

    Well-known member
  • Jul 19, 2007
    1,396
    31
    48
    alpha canis majoris
    mkranga said:
    You got all the cheapest fighters.
    It’s ok.
    I’ll change my type.
    Try this before war fog


    new age -> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7026978532619588322

    Transformed -> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8597686993013532431

    IT'S ME.... -> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3921756519706268934

    plz don't confuse reality and fiction:

    The fighters I posted are the best available for combat in today's world. They are not cheap!!!! :shocked:
    The videos you posted are from that film Transformers. It's a film (aka FICTION)

    mkranga said:

    LOL you are Optimus Prime!! I was waiting to meet you :P
     

    jude725

    Member
    Jan 10, 2007
    64
    0
    0
    Raddolugama, Negombo.
    I like WIN RAR from all because it Zips and extracts very quickly
    I hate WinZip bcoz It is a very slow compressor and it takes so much time.
    bt i most hate is i have to press I agree when i doing anything from WinZip
    WinZip SUCKS!