WPrime 32M Benchmark !

kamalmawa

Member
Sep 9, 2008
574
1
0
Melbourne
Anusha said:
Ditto :D

2.53GHz vs. 3.56GHz n00b :P

Imagine 3.8GHz E7200 as mine? That's same as 5.3GHz AthlonX2 :P

You can't compare E7200 with a X2.. because X2 is pretty out dated... E7200 is 45nm and X2 90nm... Price wise It's more than enough what I get from AMD :D
 
Last edited:

kamalmawa

Member
Sep 9, 2008
574
1
0
Melbourne
fallenzeraphine said:
Ur an Idiot!!!!

Dude don't insult people because you think you know better.. Actually you said to me
"WTF this is bullshit how can a Athlon X2 can be almost fast as a core 2, this Benchmark is flawed." to my benchmark results because I have an AMD..
Just because you have a better CPU doesn't give u a better performance results.. In my rig I spent more money on my motherboard than my CPU.. All other parts including RAM's, Cooling, PSU very important facts on a Computer performance that's why I spent so much money on them..
 

Anusha

Member
Jun 13, 2006
25,864
5
0
kamalmawa said:
I haven't followed much Intel CPU's. When I bought my first Dual core CPU few years back X2 4200+.. There was no Core2Duo in the market.. It was Intel Dual Core CPU(check the Intel logo) Intel's answer.. But it was pretty slow compared to X2s... Later Intel added few things to and released CoreDuo,Core2Duo.. I'm not the one confused here it is u who's thinking old first stage Intel Dual Core CPU's with lower FSB, lower cache etc as another kind of CPU..
What I'm saying is Intel answer to AMD X2 was Pentium D CPU... not Core2Duo
It's dual core alright, but it is not the name they gave it. It was Pentium D.
Check this

The Pentium Dual Core CPUs are totally different, which are based on Core 2 architecture but wrongly named under Pentium moniker.
Check this
 

Anusha

Member
Jun 13, 2006
25,864
5
0
kamalmawa said:
You can't compare E7200 with a X2.. because X2 is pretty out dated... E7200 is 45nm and X2 90nm... Price wise It's more than enough what I get from AMD :D
What does 45nm or 65nm or 90nm has to do with anything????
It doesn't determine the performance. It only decides the power efficiency, clockability and material cost.
 

Anusha

Member
Jun 13, 2006
25,864
5
0
kamalmawa said:
Dude don't insult people because you think you know better.. Actually you said to me
"WTF this is bullshit how can a Athlon X2 can be almost fast as a core 2, this Benchmark is flawed." to my benchmark results because I have an AMD..
Just because you have a better CPU doesn't give u a better performance results.. In my rig I spent more money on my motherboard than my CPU.. All other parts including RAM's, Cooling, PSU very important facts on a Computer performance that's why I spent so much money on them..
So has he. He actually has everything good, including the CPU. :D
 

kamalmawa

Member
Sep 9, 2008
574
1
0
Melbourne
Anusha said:
It's dual core alright, but it is not the name they gave it. It was Pentium D.
Check this

The Pentium Dual Core CPUs are totally different, which are based on Core 2 architecture but wrongly named under Pentium moniker.
Check this

That's what I'm trying tell u.. which is Core2Duo is new different architecture than first Intel Pentium D's which released to fight with X2.. X2 hasn't change much since then..
 

kamalmawa

Member
Sep 9, 2008
574
1
0
Melbourne
Anusha said:
What does 45nm or 65nm or 90nm has to do with anything????
It doesn't determine the performance. It only decides the power efficiency, clockability and material cost.

What I meant is to point how old the technology in my AMD when u comparing to new 45nm CPU's
 

ruc

Member
Apr 22, 2007
183
0
0
Useless.....Some guys thinkin how computer Run without Intel CPU.....
But they dnt know They all on AMD Opteron DNS Servers.....
 

Anusha

Member
Jun 13, 2006
25,864
5
0
kamalmawa said:
That's what I'm trying tell u.. which is Core2Duo is new different architecture than first Intel Pentium D's which released to fight with X2.. X2 hasn't change much since then..
But there are new Athlon X2's coming soon, based on Barcelona, which are very fast, but use quite a lot of power.
kamalmawa said:
What I meant is to point how old the technology in my AMD when u comparing to new 45nm CPU's
But why are you compare two generations? X2's are comparable to PentiumD's mostly. There is no proper product from AMD against Core2Duo. Maybe PhenomX3. But PhemonX4 was built to fight against Core 2 Quad, but fails by a long margin.
ruc said:
Useless.....Some guys thinkin how computer Run without Intel CPU.....
But they dnt know They all on AMD Opteron DNS Servers.....
But we are not talking about server CPUs here.
 

gayan kalhara

Member
Nov 22, 2007
7,060
48
0
HI onna maath damma... hehe..

Hariyata Thooru MOORU asse Haal massek damma vage neda??

Please Laugh Its my pleasure..hehe









 
Last edited:

nagaya

Member
Mar 18, 2007
12,671
194
0
ruc said:
Useless.....Some guys thinkin how computer Run without Intel CPU.....
But they dnt know They all on AMD Opteron DNS Servers.....
the fastest supercomputer IBM Roadrunner even use Opteron...i think intel or amd doesn't matter...
and i wonder even the cpu many people has;they dnt make proper use of it/.... ;)
 

gayan kalhara

Member
Nov 22, 2007
7,060
48
0
nagaya said:
the fastest supercomputer IBM Roadrunner even use Opteron...i think intel or amd doesn't matter...
and i wonder even the cpu many people has;they dnt make proper use of it/.... ;)

ya true... 75% of us, just waste their money to trend.. NOT 4 the real works..

they always looking for Quad core, dualcore and if we got Pentium 4 they laugh,, But don't try to get the full use of it..

i hv met lot of guys lyk this..

i noticed most of them hv not used and P3 or P2... (some tyms even P4)
if they had used them, they never say lyk that..(but there are some ppl who.....)

mm so..wht is the most impotent ?? the digits that shows the power or, the work that doing by using it..??

I don't say the super PCS are unnecessary or money waste, They are really usefull. But......................................
 

nagaya

Member
Mar 18, 2007
12,671
194
0
gayan kalhara said:
ya true... 75% of us, just waste their money to trend.. NOT 4 the real works..

they always looking for Quad core, dualcore and if we got Pentium 4 they laugh,, But don't try to get the full use of it..

i hv met lot of guys lyk this..

i noticed most of them hv not used and P3 or P2... (some tyms even P4)
if they had used them, they never say lyk that..(but there are some ppl who.....)

mm so..wht is the most impotent ?? the digits that shows the power or, the work that doing by using it..??

I don't say the super PCS are unnecessary or money waste, They are really usefull. But......................................
i first had a 80486 :P when i was in grade 1 or 2
 

gayan kalhara

Member
Nov 22, 2007
7,060
48
0
nagaya said:
i first had a 80486 :P when i was in grade 1 or 2

mmmmmmmm elz.. eekale hatiyata honda ekkak neda..

95 he vithara neda???


Good 4 you

my first experience is with. 233..(grade 6) (not my own. my first own is P3 500)


old users know wht exactly the meaning of PCs..

now days.. the PCs hiding there true face from the new ones.. but eekale ohoma boruwak thibune na..


DAn patan ganna samahara aya Command line eka dakkath baya venava...:lol:
 

nagaya

Member
Mar 18, 2007
12,671
194
0
gayan kalhara said:

mmmmmmmm elz.. eekale hatiyata honda ekkak neda..

95 he vithara neda???


Good 4 you

my first experience is with. 233..(grade 6) (not my own. my first own is P3 500)


old users know wht exactly the meaning of PCs..

now days.. the PCs hiding there true face from the new ones.. but eekale ohoma boruwak thibune na..


DAn patan ganna samahara aya Command line eka dakkath baya venava...:lol:
my many friends don't know comman line/shell :P they've started using PCs with WinXP...few know abt 98

i have win3.1 yet./..i show it to them as a hobby ;)
 

gayan kalhara

Member
Nov 22, 2007
7,060
48
0
nagaya said:
my many friends don't know comman line/shell :P they've started using PCs with WinXP...few know abt 98

i have win3.1 yet./..i show it to them as a hobby ;)
ya me tooo..i hv 95 and the old linux kernel (its bit sux if you got newer PC but with 233 its elz)

some ppl don't even know about 98s also... they amzed with its speed..hehe..and grapix..;)

one asked me, wht happen to my xp desktop. he thought that i hv played games and hv messed with VGA

and when some ppl watching me playing with command line, their faces just lyk this :shocked::shocked::shocked::shocked::shocked::eek::eek::confused::confused:

hehhe..


do you really hv 3.1 can i hv.it pls.. as i remember its not big neda??
 
Last edited: