tigercj said:
The Truth
To all the readers of this article,
I am writing this, with reference to the above given article published by the back burning “Software Developer” Chirantha Amarasinghe. I responsibly would like to say that Chirantha Amarasinghe is someone totally crazy and needs immediate medical treatments. Because, according to the given article at Sunday leader, Chirantha Amarasinghe says that he won golds at YCS. But the truth is that Chirantha Amarasinghe was never awarded with a medal at YCS. The ones he is wearing are given to him by gateway, for the merits. He was only given 2 merits at YCS in 2005 and 2006.
Ganidu Nanayakkara had proven his absolute abilities in front of the world, by winning the YCS Gold award in 2006, 2007, 2008 and APICTA international award in 2008. The software “Talking Clock” well emphasizes the level of Chirantha Amarasinghe. Does anybody believe that it should be awarded with a gold, as Chirantha Amarasinghe imagines? It was cut out of the competition, simply because its level is insufficient to pass Chirantha Amarasinghe to the next round. Not only Chirantha Amarasinghe, but also hundreds of other competitors were cut off, is the same manner, for the same reason. Only the true talents were recognized. People who have seen Ganidu Nanayakkara’s projects at YCS know the quality of a software product, and why he was awarded with golds, where Chirantha Amarasinghe stands miles and miles behind. Having a web site and a so-called company never turns a foul into a programmer. Yes, it is true that Ganidu Nanayakkara is not found in the internet. It is his wish and others should not bother about that. Not boasting in the internet and not having an official site never even means that someone is not a software developer.
The project WATCH, designed by Ganidu Nanayakkara never deals with childish things like reading time and date like Chirantha Amarasinghe’s boasted “Product” Talking Clock does. Project WATCH totally stands out of such childish and simple things and deals with a far more complicated procedure. All Chirantha Amarasinghe knows is criticizing other excellent and awarded softwares, in-order to promote his childish and useless software “Talking Clock”. It is not Chirantha Amarasinghe’s duty to judge other’s products, which are already judged fairly and awarded.
Chirantha Amarasinghe, who is complaining to Ganidu Nanayakkara, says that the latter stole some codes. But Chirantha Amarasinghe has never even seen the product “WATCH”, developed by Ganidu Nanayakkara. So how can Chirantha Amarasinghe claim that his ideas are used in the project WATCH? Chirantha Amarasinghe must be just thinking that Ganidu Nanayakkara stole his “concepts”, just because the names of the two projects look similar. The word “WATCH” stands for “Wireless Access Technology for Computerized Horologe”. It never deals with cheap things like reading time and date. Yes, the product “WATCH” is not uploaded to the internet. The designer has the complete right to determine whether his softwares should be uploaded to the web or not. It can never be decided by an external person like Chirantha Amarasinghe.
The YCS submission index code of Ganidu Nanayakkara’s product is “S1”. Which means that it is the first product submitted under the “Senior” age category where Chirantha Amarasinghe is also included. So how can Ganidu Nanayakkara copy Chirantha Amarasinghe’s “Product”, after Ganidu’s own work is already submitted? This evident is enough to prove that Ganidu Nanayakkara is innocent and all Chirantha Amarasinghe did is a total fake. Anybody who is willing to confirm this, ask from SLASI, the organizers of YCS competition. [TP : 0112665261-2]
All the embedded IT products available in this world depends on wired and wireless devices. So using those two types of devices never means that a concept is duplicated. How can Chirantha Amarasinghe say that the project WATCH is designed with the help of Ananda College? It is a 100% individual project. Ganidu Nanayakkara is not only talented in IT field. He is also an awarded new inventor.
Mrs. Surani Samarasekara totally stands away from the judging procedure. Personal friendships are not valid in a competition. Chirantha Amarasinghe had signed to an agreement on his applications to accept the final judgement given by the qualified and educated judges seated there. Now all Chirantha Amarasinghe does is spreading out a completely false story to cover-up his jalousie, shame of defeat and ignorance. Whatever you did or said, nobody can change the truth and the real genius was, is and will be awarded.
Even the authorities have not ignored the fake and insults done by Chirantha Amarasinghe here, towards a number of responsible people and he will soon be blacklisted from all the software competitions, organized by SLASI, Microsoft, BCS and the Ministry Of Education, as a punishment for spreading out false news and outshining the board-of-officials.
Guys, The above given entire article is a total fake.
Chirantha Amarasinghe had done a great job to pretend as a programmer and to out-shine truly talented people. Chirantha Amarasinghe is a looser. Ganidu Nanayakkara is a winner. YCS is the most reliable and outstanding software competition in Sri Lanka, forever. Nobody can change that truth, not even the crazy boaster - “Chirantha Amarasinghe”.
Chirantha, I would also like to give you a personal advice. Other people are not responsible for your defeats. If you are really smart as you have boasted here, why couldn’t you win golds in other competitions? YCS is not the only software competition in Sri Lanka. Please accept the truth. You are not as smart as Ganidu Nanayakkara and he is not responsible for that. Even you have no legal evidence to prove that what you are saying is right, where Ganidu Nanayakkara can prove his software ownership at anytime. That’s why he holds PATENT for all his products. You might be a hero for your home. But the real world and competitors stay miles and miles in front of you. In real world, your software is not outstanding as your dream world says. I never say that you can never win an award. But throwing false complains towards another innocent person, to cover-up your own faults is something absolutely dirty and those types of things are done by women, not by men. That’s what you have done here, Chirantha Amarasinghe!!!
Wow, thanks for taking all the trouble. But I remember that I didn't sign to anything that allowed "intruders".
YCS is the most reliable and outstanding software competition in Sri Lanka, forever
Nothing lasts forever

are you desperate to prove something?
Mrs. Surani Samarasekara totally stands away from the judging procedure
Says a responcible person at SLASI?
How can Chirantha Amarasinghe say that the project WATCH is designed with the help of Ananda College
Yes, yes we are non-connected idiotic people know? Look who doesn't know anything LOL
Now all Chirantha Amarasinghe does is spreading out a completely false story to cover-up his jalousie, shame of defeat and ignorance. Whatever you did or said, nobody can change the truth and the real genius was, is and will be awarded.
Look who's really covering up
You are not as smart as Ganidu Nanayakkara
And you can be the judge of that?
So how can Ganidu Nanayakkara copy Chirantha Amarasinghe’s “Product”, after Ganidu’s own work is already submitted?
People do anything for money don't they?
Even the authorities have not ignored the fake and insults done by Chirantha Amarasinghe here, towards a number of responsible people and he will soon be blacklisted from all the software competitions, organized by SLASI, Microsoft, BCS and the Ministry Of Education, as a punishment for spreading out false news and outshining the board-of-officials.
Outshining?... Remember about freedom of speech.
That’s why he holds PATENT for all his products.
Omg, Parents.... look man are you even in the IT feild? One thing though did you'll cross check parents?
Now please remember that you have wasted your fingers again. There is a hidden problem you don't understand... that why I'm not blaming anyone. I forgive Ganidu because he only wanted to win.
Obviously, such a small article was able to piss so many off

look who has something to hide.
