Tim Cook Talks about iPhone VS Android!

isurueka

Well-known member
  • Jul 26, 2008
    14,214
    347
    83
    Apple touch screen invent කරා කියල හිතන්නේ IPhone එකට කලින් Touch screen devices දැකපු නැති උන්...අනේ මන්ද පොඩ්ඩක් google කරලවත් බලපල්ලා කියවන්න කලින් :baffled:
     
    • Like
    Reactions: deanXX

    intel_inside

    Well-known member
  • Jan 19, 2012
    2,284
    1,299
    113
    Apple touch screen invent කරා කියල හිතන්නේ IPhone එකට කලින් Touch screen devices දැකපු නැති උන්...අනේ මන්ද පොඩ්ඩක් google කරලවත් බලපල්ලා කියවන්න කලින් :baffled:

    Touch screen devices tibba machan not Phones

    Google karahama enne mehemai ne

    Search for : first touchscreen phone
    Touchscreen - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Touchscreen
    HP Series 100 HP-150 ca. 1983, the earliest commercial touchscreen computer. The IBM Simon Personal Communicator, ca. 1993, the first touchscreen phone.‎Capacitive sensing - ‎Resistive touchscreen - ‎Multi-touch - ‎Surface acoustic wave



    Smartphone - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smartphone
    In 2007, Apple Inc. introduced the iPhone, one of the first mobile phones to use a multi-touch interface. The iPhone was notable for its use of a large touchscreen ...‎Feature phone - ‎Nokia 9000 Communicator - ‎Ericsson R380 - ‎PDA
     

    isurueka

    Well-known member
  • Jul 26, 2008
    14,214
    347
    83
    ehemada ? ekanam mama danagena hitiye na .. eth ewa smart phone nemei ne bun :baffled:
    anika angillen ebuwath ebenawa ink panen abuwath ebenawa android phone ekak unath ehema na ne.. finger ekata witharai respond karanne :)

    එතකොට iPhone එකට ගොඩ කාලෙකට කලින් තිබුන Windows Mobile Smartphone? ඒවත් Full touch......

    උබ ඔය කියන්නේ capacitive touchscreen ගැන....නැහැ එකත් iPhone වලට කලින් තිබුන දෙයක්
     

    Safari7

    Banned
    Apr 18, 2014
    232
    8
    0
    nope.......then what about windows mobile smartphones? the also lacked physical keyboard long before first iPhone

    Don't know about windows smart phones. Didn't they appear recently?

    However Gizmodo tells that this is the first all-touch phone and not the iPhone.

    18kx87ru9c3brjpg.jpg


    http://gizmodo.com/5870512/apple-didnt-invent-the-all-touch-phone

    I'm not telling that Apple is the best. But they played a significant role in the computer and electronics industry and they have a big history with big track records. Steve Jobs is one of the person who massively contributed to the idea of Personal Computers.
     

    isurueka

    Well-known member
  • Jul 26, 2008
    14,214
    347
    83
    Touch screen devices tibba machan not Phones

    Google karahama enne mehemai ne

    Search for : first touchscreen phone
    Touchscreen - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Touchscreen
    HP Series 100 HP-150 ca. 1983, the earliest commercial touchscreen computer. The IBM Simon Personal Communicator, ca. 1993, the first touchscreen phone.‎Capacitive sensing - ‎Resistive touchscreen - ‎Multi-touch - ‎Surface acoustic wave



    Smartphone - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smartphone
    In 2007, Apple Inc. introduced the iPhone, one of the first mobile phones to use a multi-touch interface. The iPhone was notable for its use of a large touchscreen ...‎Feature phone - ‎Nokia 9000 Communicator - ‎Ericsson R380 - ‎PDA

    පහල තියන රිප්ලයි එක බලපන්
     

    intel_inside

    Well-known member
  • Jan 19, 2012
    2,284
    1,299
    113
    එතකොට iPhone එකට ගොඩ කාලෙකට කලින් තිබුන Windows Mobile Smartphone? ඒවත් Full touch......

    උබ ඔය කියන්නේ capacitive touchscreen ගැන....නැහැ එකත් iPhone වලට කලින් තිබුන දෙයක්

    mokakkda bun e phone eka ? eka finger ekata wada da ?
    multi torch tibbada ?
    poddak kiyapanko sirawatama danaganna asai mama waradi da danne na ne bun :baffled:
     

    intel_inside

    Well-known member
  • Jan 19, 2012
    2,284
    1,299
    113
    Don't know about windows smart phones. Didn't they appear recently?

    However Gizmodo tells that this is the first all-touch phone and not the iPhone.

    18kx87ru9c3brjpg.jpg


    http://gizmodo.com/5870512/apple-didnt-invent-the-all-touch-phone

    I'm not telling that Apple is the best. But they played a significant role in the computer and electronics industry and they have a big history with big track records. Steve Jobs is one of the person who massively contributed to the idea of Personal Computers.

    " I'm not telling that Apple is the best. But they played a significant role in the computer and electronics industry and they have a big history with big track records. Steve Jobs is one of the person who massively contributed to the idea of Personal Computers. "

    AGREE WITH YOU MACHAN ! APPLE NOT IS THE BEST .. BUT WE CANT CHANGE PAST :)
     

    isurueka

    Well-known member
  • Jul 26, 2008
    14,214
    347
    83
    Don't know about windows smart phones. Didn't they appear recently?

    However Gizmodo tells that this is the first all-touch phone and not the iPhone.

    18kx87ru9c3brjpg.jpg


    http://gizmodo.com/5870512/apple-didnt-invent-the-all-touch-phone

    I'm not telling that Apple is the best. But they played a significant role in the computer and electronics industry and they have a big history with big track records. Steve Jobs is one of the person who massively contributed to the idea of Personal Computers.

    i do agree with that no problem on that point.

    what i was trying to say is apple did not invent the touch screen and no windows phone is new but windows mobile is way older than iOS.
     

    isurueka

    Well-known member
  • Jul 26, 2008
    14,214
    347
    83
    " I'm not telling that Apple is the best. But they played a significant role in the computer and electronics industry and they have a big history with big track records. Steve Jobs is one of the person who massively contributed to the idea of Personal Computers. "

    AGREE WITH YOU MACHAN ! APPLE NOT IS THE BEST .. BUT WE CANT CHANGE PAST :)

    දැන් මං Apple නරකයි කිව්වේ නැහැ නේ? ඔව් iPhone එක 2007 හැටියට වෙනස්ම phone එකක්. මට කියන්න ඕනේ උනේ apple touch screen introduce කරා කියන fact එක වැරදි එච්චරයි........Company එකක් විදිහට Appleලගේ attitude එකට මං ආස නැහැ දැන් මේ වීඩියෝ එකේම බලන්න Tim Cook කතා කරන හැටි කවදාවත් Larry Page iOS වලට ඔහොම කියනවද?
     

    deanXX

    Well-known member
  • Oct 15, 2013
    21,170
    15,679
    113
    Steve jobs malata passe apple watila thiyenne.khoma watilada kiyanawanam wena os ekakata wada thamange os eka hodai kiyanna tharamatama watila.lajjai oi. :lol:
     

    Safari7

    Banned
    Apr 18, 2014
    232
    8
    0
    i do agree with that no problem on that point.

    what i was trying to say is apple did not invent the touch screen and no windows phone is new but windows mobile is way older than iOS.

    Neither I believe that its the first touch screen product. But it definitely commercially succeeded in creating a mobile phone with the physical keyboard removed and that probably made a new industry standard.

    Me too hate some of the facts about Apple. But there are some that I like. Apple products were always engineered to be efficient rather than just implementing something and releasing it to be the first bring it to the market. OS X based on BSD and unix is efficient. iOS is very strict about "resource utilization" for the apps running on it and that makes the iPhone retain its original performance figures throughout the its lifetime.
     

    intel_inside

    Well-known member
  • Jan 19, 2012
    2,284
    1,299
    113
    දැන් මං Apple නරකයි කිව්වේ නැහැ නේ? ඔව් iPhone එක 2007 හැටියට වෙනස්ම phone එකක්. මට කියන්න ඕනේ උනේ apple touch screen introduce කරා කියන fact එක වැරදි එච්චරයි........Company එකක් විදිහට Appleලගේ attitude එකට මං ආස නැහැ දැන් මේ වීඩියෝ එකේම බලන්න Tim Cook කතා කරන හැටි කවදාවත් Larry Page iOS වලට ඔහොම කියනවද?

    බලන්න Tim Cook කතා කරන හැටි කවදාවත් Larry Page iOS වලට ඔහොම කියනවද?

    Machan ekanam attha tim cook karana magulak na steve ge mole thamai oya okkoma tim karanne dan research team eka dena de sign karana eka withari :angry:
    kohoma unath ekanam maha chater kathawak miniha kiwwe, steve kawadakwath ohoma wena company ekakata kiyanne na bun :)
     

    isurueka

    Well-known member
  • Jul 26, 2008
    14,214
    347
    83
    Neither I believe that its the first touch screen product. But it definitely commercially succeeded in creating a mobile phone with the physical keyboard removed and that probably made a new industry standard.

    Me too hate some of the facts about Apple. But there are some that I like. Apple products were always engineered to be efficient rather than just implementing something and releasing it to be the first bring it to the market. OS X based on BSD and unix is efficient. iOS is very strict about "resource utilization" for the apps running on it and that makes the iPhone retain its original performance figures throughout the its lifetime.

    Android is essentially Linux which is also developed from Unix so core of Android is very flexible and efficient......both platforms have both cons and pros :)
     

    Safari7

    Banned
    Apr 18, 2014
    232
    8
    0
    Android is essentially Linux which is also developed from Unix so core of Android is very flexible and efficient......both platforms have both cons and pros :)

    Of course both has their pros and cons.

    Small correction though, Linux doesn't share Unix code base, although linux is efficient as much as Unix.

    iPhone apps are suspended when sent to background (there are exceptions though). No apps can retain itself in the foreground. Apps holding onto resources for too long are killed by the OS. No services allowed, remote invocation is used via push notifications instead (no polling in background or via services).

    All of the above features improves the performance. Apps can be distributed only via the App Store. All apps are code signed by the developer. Any modifications made by a third party to an app invalidates developers signature. All apps are reviewed before publishing. No serial numbers, mac addresses are exposed. All of these facts improves the security.

    What about in Android?
     

    Kalana_65

    Well-known member
  • LOL.. iphone models kiyada thiyenne ewalata updates dena eka maha loku deyak aa.. android kochchara devices thiyenawada.. iphone wage 100 gunayakatath wada athi.. low end phone walata kohomatath aluth updates enne nane.. me comparison eka wena brand ekak ekka kalanam pili ganna thibba..
     

    isurueka

    Well-known member
  • Jul 26, 2008
    14,214
    347
    83
    Of course both has their pros and cons.

    Small correction though, Linux doesn't share Unix code base, although linux is efficient as much as Unix.

    iPhone apps are suspended when sent to background (there are exceptions though). No apps can retain itself in the foreground. Apps holding onto resources for too long are killed by the OS. No services allowed, remote invocation is used via push notifications instead (no polling in background or via services).

    yes in other words iOS lacks true multitasking while Android provide true multitasking just like desktop windows.....those are just two different approaches both have pros and cons. personally i like Android approach and yes that's totally personal preference

    All of the above features improves the performance. Apps can be distributed only via the App Store. All apps are code signed by the developer. Any modifications made by a third party to an app invalidates developers signature. All apps are reviewed before publishing. No serial numbers, mac addresses are exposed. All of these facts improves the security.

    What about in Android?

    again two different approaches.......iOS is tightly controlled by apple while google has more open ecosystem. Android allows the owner to take full control of the device. again both have pros and cons
     
    Last edited: