✈✈ Aviation ✈✈

Local Disk (c:)

Well-known member
  • Apr 13, 2011
    4,194
    236
    63
    A320 Hanger
    Inside the Airbus A350XWB.




    11755276_925932167446207_2497960364269285219_n.jpg






    patta bn..:cool::cool:
     

    fakerandi

    Well-known member
  • Jan 19, 2008
    3,859
    166
    63
    ehama onama kiyala na nea da ban ?? pilot la oversea yawala trainee denna puluwan danna widihata :yes::yes:

    ow issara sim nathi kaale ape pilots la singapore yawala thamai train kare. long term ehema karana eka paadu nisa thamai sim ekak genawe. 350 ekath gennala awurudu 4.5 withara sim ekak genei. ape aiiyala aluthen dewal ganna hari kamathi ne:rofl: commision eka wadainawa ne:lol::lol::lol:
     

    Local Disk (c:)

    Well-known member
  • Apr 13, 2011
    4,194
    236
    63
    A320 Hanger
    ow issara sim nathi kaale ape pilots la singapore yawala thamai train kare. long term ehema karana eka paadu nisa thamai sim ekak genawe. 350 ekath gennala awurudu 4.5 withara sim ekak genei. ape aiiyala aluthen dewal ganna hari kamathi ne:rofl: commision eka wadainawa ne:lol::lol::lol:

    Ubata hithenne mkaka..ape un 350 ganida:sorry:
     

    Hashan dis

    Well-known member
  • Sep 10, 2008
    15,010
    657
    113
    "Let’s look at the perennial white elephant Mattala Airport. Four-lane highway to bring and take out passengers, but no passengers! Runway strength and length to land the heaviest and the largest modern skybirds, but no planes! Fancy appearance and fancier electronics with instrument landing systems, but some fool forgot to have a taxiway for the jets to enter the runway without doing a 180- turn at the end. That is unbelievably stupid as whoever made that decision sure did not know anything about international aerodromes. I am not even mentioning runway alignment and cross winds, that is trivia relative to the ‘no taxiway’ construction. I read in the papers someone advising COPE that the airport earned a lot of money from over-flying traffic as Airlines flew the route because Mattala was there to land in case of emergency. Tomorrow you set fire to Mattala, the planes will still fly the same route without batting an eye-lid. That I know for sure for I have been in that sky for a very long time flying very heavy aeroplanes all over the world.

    Just for comparison, San Francisco International has many runways and the longest is 3,600 meters in length and 45 meters wide. Mattala is 3,500 meters long and 60 meters wide. Wider than SFO and only short by 100 meters – but brilliantly designed taxi-way – my foot!

    Now let’s get back to a simple argument, kindergarten style.

    Someone built Mattala and another closed it and the cost was borne by the coffers of the motherland. Well! One of them has to be wrong, either the builder or the ‘shut it down’ man. But looks like no one is at fault? The reason is simple, in politics "though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be white as snow." So the Mattala saga continues, maybe the regimes will change and we get back to square one and Mattala will strive again. But I still like to know who built that stupid taxiway in a modern airport for aeroplanes to do 180- turns to line up for takeoff."

    http://island.lk/index.php?page_cat=article-details&page=article-details&code_title=128362

    full
    article

    Capt. Elmo Jayawardena the island paper ekata liyapu article ekaka
    kotasak meka.anith kotas nam aviation walata sambanda ne


     

    Local Disk (c:)

    Well-known member
  • Apr 13, 2011
    4,194
    236
    63
    A320 Hanger
    "Let’s look at the perennial white elephant Mattala Airport. Four-lane highway to bring and take out passengers, but no passengers! Runway strength and length to land the heaviest and the largest modern skybirds, but no planes! Fancy appearance and fancier electronics with instrument landing systems, but some fool forgot to have a taxiway for the jets to enter the runway without doing a 180- turn at the end. That is unbelievably stupid as whoever made that decision sure did not know anything about international aerodromes. I am not even mentioning runway alignment and cross winds, that is trivia relative to the ‘no taxiway’ construction. I read in the papers someone advising COPE that the airport earned a lot of money from over-flying traffic as Airlines flew the route because Mattala was there to land in case of emergency. Tomorrow you set fire to Mattala, the planes will still fly the same route without batting an eye-lid. That I know for sure for I have been in that sky for a very long time flying very heavy aeroplanes all over the world.

    Just for comparison, San Francisco International has many runways and the longest is 3,600 meters in length and 45 meters wide. Mattala is 3,500 meters long and 60 meters wide. Wider than SFO and only short by 100 meters – but brilliantly designed taxi-way – my foot!

    Now let’s get back to a simple argument, kindergarten style.

    Someone built Mattala and another closed it and the cost was borne by the coffers of the motherland. Well! One of them has to be wrong, either the builder or the ‘shut it down’ man. But looks like no one is at fault? The reason is simple, in politics "though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be white as snow." So the Mattala saga continues, maybe the regimes will change and we get back to square one and Mattala will strive again. But I still like to know who built that stupid taxiway in a modern airport for aeroplanes to do 180- turns to line up for takeoff."

    http://island.lk/index.php?page_cat=article-details&page=article-details&code_title=128362

    full
    article

    Capt. Elmo Jayawardena the island paper ekata liyapu article ekaka
    kotasak meka.anith kotas nam aviation walata sambanda ne


    :(:(:( mewa kiyawaddi epa wenawa bn