Did you follow the 8 fold path,how did you become sowan just by this view?what was the method
right-view is the start. the rest manifest simultaneously.
Did you follow the 8 fold path,how did you become sowan just by this view?what was the method
what is the right view?right-view is the start. the rest manifest simultaneously.
Nothing to do in the first place was your right view?right-view is the start. the rest manifest simultaneously.
What Lord Buddah has said
But pointing to the opposite extreme is still within wrong view—truth lies beyond both ends.
Did you do kayanupassana?What was the method to become sowan?
what is the right view?
Nothing to do in the first place was your right view?
You may at a fix point that any kind of knowledge is just so called Sakkaya-ditti and that's not the real fact broLord Buddha himself is sakkaya-ditti to you. And what has been told by Lord Buddha is sakkaya-ditti as well.
yup, and still it's a knowledge to you and therefore sakkaya-ditti.
------ Post added on Jun 25, 2025 at 10:08 PM
You may at a fix point that any kind of knowledge is just so called Sakkaya-ditti and that's not the real fact bro
not always. sakkaya ditti is the wrong view that there is a permanent, unchanging "self" (atta) within the pancha upadaskanda. it clings to one or more of these pancha upadaskanda as "This is me, this is mine, or this is my self." and every unenlightened people cannot be regarded as prutugjanaNo facts in Damma. No way to factualize Loukottora.
And yep, any kind of knowledge is sakkaya-ditti to a prutugjana.
I dont know ban.i feel like we are turning buddhism to ramana maharishi,zen pathway.I dont know if its the ultimate truth.There was no i in the first place.its all one.never exicted.No facts in Damma. No way to factualize Loukottora.
And yep, any kind of knowledge is sakkaya-ditti to a prutugjana.
------ Post added on Jun 25, 2025 at 10:24 PM
not always. sakkaya ditti is the wrong view that there is a permanent, unchanging "self" (atta) within the pancha upadaskanda. it clings to one or more of these pancha upadaskanda as "This is me, this is mine, or this is my self." and every unenlightened people cannot be regarded as prutugjana
I dont know ban.i feel like we are turning buddhism to ramana maharishi,zen pathway.I dont know if its the ultimate truth.There was no i in the first place.its all one.never exicted.
It seems like a very easy theory.I was an illusion nothing was there to do in the first place.All is a dream appearing on screen because of the identification of i.The dream and screen are one and the same.
you're kidding here as I guess! everybody must be unconscious if that is even worldly trueThease all are just *knowledge* you have constructed from perceptions. (panchaupadanaskanda)
There have been *things* you perceived, *you* who perceived and *knowledge* you have constructed, means there have been permanent, unchanging self, things and constructions.
there are two diffrent things we have to take in to account that are "arya magga" and "arya phala". an unenlightened person who has already begun the path to liberation is NOT a pruthagjana and his ditti is NOT sakkaya ditti.you're kidding here as I guess! everybody must be unconscious if that is even worldly true![]()
an unenlightened person who has already begun the path to liberation is NOT a pruthagjana and his ditti is NOT sakkaya ditti.
Then how come dharma is same.He saw the reality as it is.You even quoted his last words
Then how come dharma is same.He saw the reality as it is.You even quoted his last words
Then why did he said like that.Damma is Loukottora.
The reality is Nibbana. Nothing which exists or doesn't exist is there to be seen and no one who sees.
Then why did he said like that.
Its rhe same as gods will.everything is predetermind.you are not the doer anyway.everything unfolding as it shouldfor the sake of බහුජන හිතාය බහුජන සුකාය.