සන්සාරය?!?!

Fiona Dabare

Well-known member
  • Jul 28, 2024
    8,110
    7,597
    113
    Colombo
    What Lord Buddah has said

    Lord Buddha himself is sakkaya-ditti to you. And what has been told by Lord Buddha is sakkaya-ditti as well.


    But pointing to the opposite extreme is still within wrong view—truth lies beyond both ends.

    yup, and still it's a knowledge to you and therefore sakkaya-ditti.


    Did you do kayanupassana?What was the method to become sowan?

    There's a metaphor that Lord Buddha has said,
    "පිහිටාත් නොපිහිටාත් ඕගය තරනය කලා" or something.
    And as I told you earlier when you asked "What's right-viewing", Lokouttara things cannot be objectified or written.

    what is the right view?

    Right-View is the ability to recognize Wrong-View as Wrong-View.
    ------ Post added on Jun 25, 2025 at 10:06 PM

    Nothing to do in the first place was your right view?

    *Who* does *what*?
    ------ Post added on Jun 25, 2025 at 10:08 PM
     
    • Sad
    Reactions: Yeezus

    Lovtus

    Well-known member
  • Apr 26, 2015
    12,856
    21,397
    113
    Lord Buddha himself is sakkaya-ditti to you. And what has been told by Lord Buddha is sakkaya-ditti as well.




    yup, and still it's a knowledge to you and therefore sakkaya-ditti.

    ------ Post added on Jun 25, 2025 at 10:08 PM
    You may at a fix point that any kind of knowledge is just so called Sakkaya-ditti and that's not the real fact bro
     

    Lovtus

    Well-known member
  • Apr 26, 2015
    12,856
    21,397
    113
    No facts in Damma. No way to factualize Loukottora.
    And yep, any kind of knowledge is sakkaya-ditti to a prutugjana.
    not always. sakkaya ditti is the wrong view that there is a permanent, unchanging "self" (atta) within the pancha upadaskanda. it clings to one or more of these pancha upadaskanda as "This is me, this is mine, or this is my self." and every unenlightened people cannot be regarded as prutugjana
     

    Emios

    Well-known member
  • Dec 10, 2009
    74,958
    67,227
    113
    No facts in Damma. No way to factualize Loukottora.
    And yep, any kind of knowledge is sakkaya-ditti to a prutugjana.


    ------ Post added on Jun 25, 2025 at 10:24 PM
    I dont know ban.i feel like we are turning buddhism to ramana maharishi,zen pathway.I dont know if its the ultimate truth.There was no i in the first place.its all one.never exicted.
     

    Fiona Dabare

    Well-known member
  • Jul 28, 2024
    8,110
    7,597
    113
    Colombo
    not always. sakkaya ditti is the wrong view that there is a permanent, unchanging "self" (atta) within the pancha upadaskanda. it clings to one or more of these pancha upadaskanda as "This is me, this is mine, or this is my self." and every unenlightened people cannot be regarded as prutugjana

    Thease all are just *knowledge* you have constructed from perceptions. (panchaupadanaskanda)

    There have been *things* you perceived, *you* who perceived and *knowledge* you have constructed, means there have been permanent, unchanging self, things and constructions.

    I dont know ban.i feel like we are turning buddhism to ramana maharishi,zen pathway.I dont know if its the ultimate truth.There was no i in the first place.its all one.never exicted.

    and you would never know for sure
    ------ Post added on Jun 25, 2025 at 10:37 PM
     
    • Haha
    Reactions: Lovtus

    Emios

    Well-known member
  • Dec 10, 2009
    74,958
    67,227
    113
    It seems like a very easy theory.I was an illusion nothing was there to do in the first place.All is a dream appearing on screen because of the identification of i.The dream and screen are one and the same.
     

    Fiona Dabare

    Well-known member
  • Jul 28, 2024
    8,110
    7,597
    113
    Colombo
    It seems like a very easy theory.I was an illusion nothing was there to do in the first place.All is a dream appearing on screen because of the identification of i.The dream and screen are one and the same.

    you saw *it* *like a easy theory*..
    yep ignorance
     

    Lovtus

    Well-known member
  • Apr 26, 2015
    12,856
    21,397
    113
    Thease all are just *knowledge* you have constructed from perceptions. (panchaupadanaskanda)

    There have been *things* you perceived, *you* who perceived and *knowledge* you have constructed, means there have been permanent, unchanging self, things and constructions.
    you're kidding here as I guess! everybody must be unconscious if that is even worldly true :lol: there are two diffrent things we have to take in to account that are "arya magga" and "arya phala". an unenlightened person who has already begun the path to liberation is NOT a pruthagjana and his ditti is NOT sakkaya ditti.
     

    Fiona Dabare

    Well-known member
  • Jul 28, 2024
    8,110
    7,597
    113
    Colombo
    you're kidding here as I guess! everybody must be unconscious if that is even worldly true :lol:

    yep, free to have any opinion

    an unenlightened person who has already begun the path to liberation is NOT a pruthagjana and his ditti is NOT sakkaya ditti.

    Path begins from Samma-Ditti/ Right-View.
    So yes, one who already in the path has Right-View indeed.
    And ofc, he is no longer a prutugjana.
     

    Emios

    Well-known member
  • Dec 10, 2009
    74,958
    67,227
    113
    Ramana maharshi said everything is predetermind.Do you beleive that?if not dharma is not one.