Yes, I agree with the point about the U.S. and NATO, but I don't agree with the idea that the U.S. won't lose over the next 100 years?
The United States and NATO are generally considered more powerful than Russia in terms of overall military capability, economic strength, and alliances. Their strength lies in military power, economic resources, and global reach. While NATO and the US have significant advantages in these areas, Russia's nuclear capabilities and military advancements make it a formidable opponent. However, geopolitical dynamics and specific situations ultimately determine the outcomes of conflicts or power struggles.
That said, when it comes to weapons technology, Russia is leading in certain areas. Russia has made significant advancements and is often regarded as a leader in specific types of military hardware, particularly in hypersonic weapons, nuclear forces, electronic warfare, and air defense. However, in the overall balance of military power and technology, the United States and NATO hold a broader advantage, particularly in naval power, air superiority (especially with stealth technology), and global reach. Russia’s focus has been on asymmetric and advanced technologies to offset NATO's conventional superiority.
It's difficult to predict with certainty how global conflicts will unfold over the next 100 years, as many factors political, economic, technological, and social shape the outcomes of wars and power dynamics. Currently, it is evident that the U.S. is facing increased competition due to the rise of China and Russia. While it is impossible to predict the future with certainty, the U.S. is unlikely to lose a major war against communist powers in the near future, given its military, economic, and technological advantages. However, the nature of warfare and global conflict is evolving, with non traditional forms of competition such as cyber warfare, economic pressure, and proxy conflicts becoming more prominent. The next century will likely see a balance of power and competition.