✈✈ Aviation ✈✈

kmc madushan

Well-known member
  • Feb 20, 2011
    23,883
    2,103
    113
    LK
    Sri Lankan A321neo (4R-ANC) First Flight :cool::cool::cool::cool:


    34835376541_fcfc33c5e5_b.jpg


    34967513015_b3af1fba84_b.jpg


    34926727256_8180058e2e_b.jpg


    34157004143_dfe444523a_b.jpg


    34124563594_85d6eee018_b.jpg


    34157027203_3698ab10cc_b.jpg


    PIC Credit : Tobias Gudat flickr
     

    kmc madushan

    Well-known member
  • Feb 20, 2011
    23,883
    2,103
    113
    LK
    ඔවල රූට් මොනවද මචන්. දැන් නම් ශ්‍රි ලන්කන් එකේ යන්න ආසයි. කාලෙකින් ගියේ නැ..

    india thama ban target eka :yes::yes: godak increase wei issarahata
     

    Screw SL

    Banned
  • Jan 4, 2013
    11,478
    718
    113
    43
    No Longer in Elakiri
    india thama ban target eka :yes::yes: godak increase wei issarahata
    දැන් වික්ටොරියා සීශෙල්ස් යන්නේ ශ්‍රි ලන්කන් එවද නැත්තම් මිහින් එවද මචන්. ඒ රූට් එකට ඔය අලුත් එව දාන්නේ නැද්ද?
     

    kmc madushan

    Well-known member
  • Feb 20, 2011
    23,883
    2,103
    113
    LK
    දැන් වික්ටොරියා සීශෙල්ස් යන්නේ ශ්‍රි ලන්කන් එවද නැත්තම් මිහින් එවද මචන්. ඒ රූට් එකට ඔය අලුත් එව දාන්නේ නැද්ද?

    mihin samahara aircraft dunna ban aya dan sri lankan A320 ewa yanne
     

    fakerandi

    Well-known member
  • Jan 19, 2008
    3,859
    166
    63
    Bahrain airspace eka poddak cross karala Iran airspace eka haraha thamai yanne danata mama hithanne :baffled:

    menna scene con eka.
    https://centreforaviation.com/insig...ider-ramifications-for-global-aviation-348493

    The Transit Agreement gives Qatar access to Bahrain and UAE airspace, but not Saudi airspace

    In the immediate hours after the various bans were announced, there was confusion regarding the exact meaning and implementation of airspace closure. The difference is critical.

    Four Middle East countries – Bahrain, Egypt, Saudi Arabia and UAE – have closed airspace for flights landing and taking off between their respective countries and the State of Qatar. This is significant and will be explored in further detail in the next section, but potentially a larger impact is the closure of airspace to Qatar-operated flights merely overflying the four countries and not landing or taking off in one of the four countries.

    Bilateral air services agreements, whether constrained or permitting open skies, govern landing and take off rights. Yet overflight rights are encompassed primarily in the multilateral Transit Agreement. The Transit Agreement (of 30-Jan-1945) is separate from the Chicago Convention (07-Dec-1944), which merely confirmed the exclusive sovereignty of all states in the airspace above their territory. It therefore became desirable to have a multilateral agreement to allow overflights (and landing for technical reasons, the "first" and "second" freedoms). Not all states that have ratified the Chicago Convention have adhered to the Transit Agreement, but most have.

    Three of the four countries banning Qatari flights from landing are party to the Transit Agreement: Bahrain (12-Oct-1971), Egypt (13-Mar-1947) and the UAE (25-Apr-1972).

    Crucially, Saudi Arabia in 1962 ratified the Chicago Convention but has not ratified the Transit Agreement. With no obligation to allow Qatar access to its airspace, Saudi Arabia has withdrawn the privilege.

    Bahrain, Egypt and the UAE have committed under the agreement to permit scheduled flights from the State of Qatar to overfly their airspace. If the theory is clear, the practice is grey: the sensitivity of the dispute and urgency to force action does not necessarily mean the Transit Agreement will be complied with or will be seen as valid. There is no police force to enforce commercial international compacts and, while ICAO nominally has dispute resolution powers, they have scarcely been resorted to in 70 years and are largely ineffective. So it often falls to recourse to retaliation to bring antagonists to the table; but here Qatar appears to have little to fight back with - in aviation terms at least.
     

    Hashan dis

    Well-known member
  • Sep 10, 2008
    15,010
    657
    113
    bahrain awulak nadda? oya moanwa kiwwath machan thiyanawa ne agreements sign karala. freedom of air agreements.ethakota ohoma nawathanna ba ne:baffled:

    bahrain th awul but flightradar24 eke pena widiyata
    poddak wage bahrain airspace eka touch wenawa anemanda ban meka nisa
    anith airlines th loku durak yanna ona iran airspace ekan ada srilankan flight
    eka doha giye iran walin :oo:
     

    Hashan dis

    Well-known member
  • Sep 10, 2008
    15,010
    657
    113
    menna scene con eka.
    https://centreforaviation.com/insig...ider-ramifications-for-global-aviation-348493

    The Transit Agreement gives Qatar access to Bahrain and UAE airspace, but not Saudi airspace

    In the immediate hours after the various bans were announced, there was confusion regarding the exact meaning and implementation of airspace closure. The difference is critical.

    Four Middle East countries – Bahrain, Egypt, Saudi Arabia and UAE – have closed airspace for flights landing and taking off between their respective countries and the State of Qatar. This is significant and will be explored in further detail in the next section, but potentially a larger impact is the closure of airspace to Qatar-operated flights merely overflying the four countries and not landing or taking off in one of the four countries.

    Bilateral air services agreements, whether constrained or permitting open skies, govern landing and take off rights. Yet overflight rights are encompassed primarily in the multilateral Transit Agreement. The Transit Agreement (of 30-Jan-1945) is separate from the Chicago Convention (07-Dec-1944), which merely confirmed the exclusive sovereignty of all states in the airspace above their territory. It therefore became desirable to have a multilateral agreement to allow overflights (and landing for technical reasons, the "first" and "second" freedoms). Not all states that have ratified the Chicago Convention have adhered to the Transit Agreement, but most have.

    Three of the four countries banning Qatari flights from landing are party to the Transit Agreement: Bahrain (12-Oct-1971), Egypt (13-Mar-1947) and the UAE (25-Apr-1972).

    Crucially, Saudi Arabia in 1962 ratified the Chicago Convention but has not ratified the Transit Agreement. With no obligation to allow Qatar access to its airspace, Saudi Arabia has withdrawn the privilege.

    Bahrain, Egypt and the UAE have committed under the agreement to permit scheduled flights from the State of Qatar to overfly their airspace. If the theory is clear, the practice is grey: the sensitivity of the dispute and urgency to force action does not necessarily mean the Transit Agreement will be complied with or will be seen as valid. There is no police force to enforce commercial international compacts and, while ICAO nominally has dispute resolution powers, they have scarcely been resorted to in 70 years and are largely ineffective. So it often falls to recourse to retaliation to bring antagonists to the table; but here Qatar appears to have little to fight back with - in aviation terms at least.


    Ahh meka thamai siddiya ehanam :yes: