I think you need to ask Christians whether they can answer this or not. But I can guarantee you that this will be answered somewhere. So it comes to the question can it be logically answered? Well yes, but the problem is who decides whether it is logical enough or not? For you all answers provided for errors in Bible are not logical enough. But that's your subjective view. For me answers provided for errors in quaran are not logical enough. That's my view. So we end up in the same place again. You say there are errors in bible. I say there are errors in quran. No one can decide whether they have been answered logically enough.See anything can be answered; problem is whether it is logically answered. For example as I asked you falsification test to identify the true christians, can any Christians answered logically this??
So again, you have your opinion that says bible is corrupted. But you can't prove it.
What I'm repeatedly trying to tell you is that, I'm not saying you should follow a revelation which even has a minor corruption. It is irrelevant. I'm just saying you can't say which parts are corrupted, so some parts in that revelation are true. Which gives the question maybe the part ExMuslimAhmed is providing is indeed true.May be some parts are correct. What I was telling repeatedly that we are not going to follow a revelation which has even a minor corruption.
No one has showed proof. People have only presented logic. And as a muslim you have a biased view so you think this is proof.Then it is up to the people to decide, whether bible is correct or not. Maximum we can say it is wrong by showing proof.
Good.Ok. Even if I accept that part is correct for the sake of argument,
This is not relevant to the point I am trying to make. I do not care whether bible contradict or not. You should ask this from a Christian.what I am asking from you or exmuslim ahmed, then why the same bible says about someone to come as mentioned below. Then bible contradict itself isn’t it.some one who says islam is not from God, 1st he has to clarify what is mentioned in the book he is showing proof from
Exmuslim hasn’t given a reply for this,as he is a moron. I’m expecting a reply from you.
Not really. Some of the answers offer reasonable logic. For an example the answer I posted for your first error. It looked ok. But like I mentioned, who decides whether it is logical enough or not? Once again there has never been any proof.Ok I understand your point. You r not here, for proving something. You are saying, Christians also answers for Muslims’ question, regardless of whether it is logically correct or not.
Then now it is up to the people to decide which is correct, only thing we can do is put forward the message and the proof
I still did not get the chance to watch the full video. Will reply later.Only part of the video posted here, I don’t know the reason why it was not posted full. this is the total video clip.
in the context, at the start he says standout for injustice, he doesn’t know what news is correct, every muslim should be terrorist the thing is that if someone is terrorizing the terrorist he is following islam also he says he is not for osama binladen. So it is very clear. He is not promoting terrorism.
If you don’t still agree with the intention of Dr.zakir you can see his another video below.
What Dr. Zakir says, all the muslims should be terrorist in the context of against the anti socials element. Not in context of terrorizing against the innocent people. Hope you understand.
If someone say plainly like that, it is of course wrong. What to be noted is what the context is. he is clearly says he is not for osama bin laden , then how he supports Al qaida.
As u say, If he really promoting terrorist, he is not going to say how to solve the problems of terrorism, isn’t it..see this video.
a terrorist will never ever solve the problem of terrorism.







