Buy windows or go open-source?

Anusha

Member
Jun 13, 2006
25,864
5
0
madurax86 said:
whts earned hard is better..
It's the same thing with Windows. In Linux, you earn things the hard way by eating up your time. In Windows, you earn things the hard way by eating up hundreds of dollars. Same thing - hard earnings :lol:
 

GNS

Member
Jan 3, 2007
11,148
16
0
UF., Gampaha.
Anusha said:
It's the same thing with Windows. In Linux, you earn things the hard way by eating up your time. In Windows, you earn things the hard way by eating up hundreds of dollars. Same thing - hard earnings

:yes::yes::yes::yes::yes:
 

rad

Member
Oct 11, 2006
379
0
0
In front of my monitor
Mee 2 bros and siss will go for open source.Why should we dance for evry thng that MS says?
Developing countries like our needs sme push!
Bt the only thing MS does is push our money to America!
So that V will sitll B developing and by the time they will be Rich and developped.

So DOWN GOES WINDOWS.and UPCOMES OPEN SOURCE !!!

I like the free world.
 

Anusha

Member
Jun 13, 2006
25,864
5
0
rad said:
Mee 2 bros and siss will go for open source.Why should we dance for evry thng that MS says?
Developing countries like our needs sme push!
Bt the only thing MS does is push our money to America!
So that V will sitll B developing and by the time they will be Rich and developped.

So DOWN GOES WINDOWS.and UPCOMES OPEN SOURCE !!!

I like the free world.
But do you like us to be treated like a poor country? I mean, there is a Windows Vista Starter Edition for the poor countries. Either you can buy it and save our money, or you cam buy a normal edition and say that we are not as poor as they think we are, or we can pirate them and stay unnoticed (don't say, go screw yourself Micro$oft, because we are the ones who are doing the wrong thing)
 

lasanka

Member
Oct 19, 2006
14,542
1
0
38
Welisara
Anusha said:
But do you like us to be treated like a poor country? I mean, there is a Windows Vista Starter Edition for the poor countries. Either you can buy it and save our money, or you cam buy a normal edition and say that we are not as poor as they think we are, or we can pirate them and stay unnoticed (don't say, go screw yourself Micro$oft, because we are the ones who are doing the wrong thing)
logical...
 

shanX

Active member
  • Oct 4, 2006
    9,944
    2
    38
    Kandy, LK
    Anusha said:
    But do you like us to be treated like a poor country? I mean, there is a Windows Vista Starter Edition for the poor countries. Either you can buy it and save our money, or you cam buy a normal edition and say that we are not as poor as they think we are, or we can pirate them and stay unnoticed (don't say, go screw yourself Micro$oft, because we are the ones who are doing the wrong thing)
    :yes: Get rich or use pirated s/w :D
     

    sri_lion

    Member
    Sep 14, 2006
    12,908
    102
    0
    Kuala Lumpur
    I think we discussed this issue before!

    Anyway the main selling point and the strong point in Windows was the user interface by doing so they slowly but surely became such a force and now dominating the world,

    there is no way a normal user can survive in LINUX... that's for sure unless they adopt Window's tactics and make LINUX more user friendly... if they do it.. it wont be LINUX anymore would it?

    Windows will domain for sometime to come at least another decade!!!

    NOW!! which technology is more steady... is another issue!!!!
     

    sri_lion

    Member
    Sep 14, 2006
    12,908
    102
    0
    Kuala Lumpur
    Anusha said:
    I get that. I mean, what sort of things in Windows and Linux?

    Windows got more security flaws than LINUX..

    This actually has 2 perspectives as I see it

    1. The Problem in Architecture

    In softwares like LINUX / UNIX there is a fine line drawn between the user levels and administrator levels, with compared to Windows.. What i mean is in Window anyone can run .exe/ .dll files that can contain malicious stuff.. but in Linux you'll have to be a root user to do this... so it makes the knowledgeable person does the rough handling... even in Windows they have admin/guest privileges guest's still can add programs that may has sort of .dll files or .exe that causes a system crash!!

    Simple example is your Outlook & Thunderbird, Oulook is -you know who's technology- while Thunderbird is actually based on Linux mail clients!! And you google around to check about Outlook flaws "be my guest"!!!

    I remember in some white paper I read Windows is known to more than 50,000 viruses world wide where as LINUX and UNIX is only in 2 digits!! Another reason for this is number of systems that's been connected through Windows!!


    2. The number of people who uses it

    This purely based on popularity take Outlook still large number of people using it because its bundled with Windows for free... and anyone who needs to test a spy ware attack would test with the software that most people uses!! To make it become more effective.... So in anybodies eye's Outlook is the target....

    Where as very few people uses Linux and Unix systems, so why make your butt get torned for 2 cents?