gayannr said:So you think processing more and more pixels is-piece of cake
.But i mean with 384 bit of memory bus and help of 768mb of v-ram It shouldnt be a problem
Anusha said:They perform well, because of the high clocks.
It's not universal,compare A64 clock with p4,if it's bit old for you think C2D vs Pentium-D clock.dexter.morgan.666 said:I think what he ment was that its a [SIZE=-1]common Fact (higher it gets more you can gain)
[/SIZE]
gayannr said:It's not universal,compare A64 clock with p4,if it's bit old for you think C2D vs Pentium-D clock.
dexter.morgan.666 said:speaking of which...... these AMD clock speeds are still cofusing me...
can anybody explain is it AMD 2800+ = Intel 2.8Ghz
or AMD 2800+ = Intel 1.8 Ghz





there are no AMD or Intel processors LOL..Athlon/Sempron/.. ,Pentium/Core2/Celeron/...
.Is It,



It will be compatible, but if DX10.1 adds some new specs, they cannot be used by DX10 hardware. They could only be performance enhancements.samiram said:can anyone pls tell me....
that the 8800gts will support DX10.1 games....
and when will these DX10.1 games will come....
![]()
gayannr said:It's not universal,compare A64 clock with p4,if it's bit old for you think C2D vs Pentium-D clock.
dexter.morgan.666 said:What i ment was that
So back to the question.Is It,
AMD Athlon 64x 2800+ = Intel pentium 2.8Ghz or 1.8 Ghz![]()
They changed pipelining design (i.e. stages) and brought SSE3 in Prescott design.blood_brotha said:who said to compare A64 to p4.. we were talking bout gpus here![]()
intel released netburst with pentiums.. look at the prescotts.. the basic architechture was the same(netburst) what they changed was the clockspeeds and cache..
the differance between a prescott 2.8 p4 and 3.0 p4 is 200mhz extra clock speed.. that makes the 3.0 faster... when they could not increase the clock speed more to make pentium 5 before heating the glaciers of antarctica to water they came up with c2d... superior architechture.. once again in the conroe series the basic achitechture remained the same... the differance between Q6300 and Q 6600 is clcokspeed and cache...
Anusha said:It will be compatible, but if DX10.1 adds some new specs, they cannot be used by DX10 hardware. They could only be performance enhancements.

but to speak the truth AMD wanted to introduce some way to compare their CPUs to Intel's.Anusha said:AMD model numbering doesn't compare AMD and Intel performance (it is a misconception). It only compares an AMD CPU to the original AMD Thunderbird architecture. An AthlonXP 2600+ @ 2.08GHz and FSB333 will perform better than a thunderbird 2.6GHz CPU with FSB "i don't know".![]()

U can compare them like that until P4C was released (with HTT)gayannr said:but to speak the truth AMD wanted to introduce some way to compare their CPUs to Intel's.![]()
![]()
Anusha said:They changed pipelining design (i.e. stages) and brought SSE3 in Prescott design.