Get ready for AGI Boyzzz 😘😘😘😘

[Edward Kenway]

That’s my limitation not the models limitation. I can only speak for a specific domain and other people in other domains do speak on how the models have improved over time.

Definition of AGI was clearly stated.

No it's not lol

Claude is clearly targeted towards specific tasks. It's not general intelligence.

 

[dayt0na]

No it's not lol

Claude is clearly targeted towards specific tasks. It's not general intelligence.

Define them then
(Don’t ask an LLM )

 

[Edward Kenway]

Define them then

Anthropic has already done it.

Unless you want to claim Claude is AGI lol

 

[dayt0na]

Anthropic has already done it.

Show me a reference.

 

[Edward Kenway]

Show me a reference.

Anthropic has already done it.

Unless you want to claim Claude is AGI lol

Do you?

 

[dayt0na]

Do you?

Stop deflecting and answer my question for once.

 

[Edward Kenway]

Stop deflecting and answer my question for once.

You lack basic understanding of AGI so i must ask, do you claim that Claude is AGI?

 

[dayt0na]

You lack basic understanding of AGI so i must ask, do you claim that Claude is AGI?

It’s not AGI YET.

Read the fucking post title and article .

It clearly says get ready for AGI. Do you have basic comprehension skills?

Now answer the question.

 

[kanakaJ]

pattern recognition walata AGI kiyanna ba. LLM wala training data walin pita simple prashnayak ahuwath okata ewa wisadanna ba.

 

[Edward Kenway]

It’s not AGI YET.

Read the fucking post title and article .

It clearly says get ready for AGI. Do you have basic comprehension skills?

Now answer the question.

Then why are you claiming that Claude IS general intelligence and it's a limitation of yours?

That’s my limitation not the models limitation. I can only speak for a specific domain and other people in other domains do speak on how the models have improved over time.

Definition of AGI was clearly stated.

Buddy you have massive limitations when it comes to intelligence but this one isn't on you

 

[dayt0na]

Then why are you claiming that Claude IS general intelligence and it's a limitation of yours?



Buddy you have massive limitations when it come to intelligence but this one isn't on you

I only inferred that we will have AGI soon. Just look at the quoted reply from you.

You are the one who's claiming that we will have AGI soon. How can we have AGI if we don't even know what's intelligence?

anyway seems like you are stuck in a loop here ....

 

[Edward Kenway]

I only inferred that we will have AGI soon. Just look at the quoted reply from you.

Yes based on feelings.

anyway seems like you are stuck in a loop here ....

Yes me and the rest of humanity given epistemology is a thing

 

[Daws]

Based on your feelings, maybe AGI is achieved.
But based on facts, AGI is NOT achieved. Period.

 

[dayt0na]

Yes based on feelings.



Yes me and the rest of humanity given epistemology is a thing

Feelings based on output from current models and their performance on benchmarks like ARC AGI - second time saying this.

Still waiting for that reference ...

 

[Edward Kenway]

Based on your feelings, maybe AGI is achieved.
But based on facts, AGI is NOT achieved. Period.

Bugger is not willing to accept

Feelings based on output from current models and their performance on benchmarks like ARC AGI - second time saying this.

Still waiting for that reference ...

No, your beloved "AGI" lacks the G. I'd say it's very important.

Reference that Claude is not a General AI? Why? You said you don't claim that didn't you?

 

[dayt0na]

Bugger is not willing to accept



No, your beloved "AGI" lacks the G. I'd say it's very important.

Reference that Claude is not a General AI? Why? You said you don't claim that didn't you?

Didn't we just agree (after quoting one of your responses) that I only inferred AGI will be achieved soon?
Why are you going around in loops?

---

Based on your feelings, maybe AGI is achieved.
But based on facts, AGI is NOT achieved. Period.

read the post title and article again.
------ Post added on Jul 16, 2026 at 2:43 PM

 

[Edward Kenway]

Didn't we just agree (after quoting one of your responses) that I only inferred AGI will be achieved soon?
Why are you going around in loops?

If Claude is not AGI then why are you asking me to prove that Claude is no AGI?

I'm not the one stuck in a loop mate

 

[dayt0na]

If Claude is not AGI then why are you asking me to prove that Claude is no AGI?

I'm not the one stuck in a loop mate