Get ready for AGI Boyzzz 😘😘😘😘

[dayt0na]

You are the one who's claiming that we will have AGI soon. How can we have AGI if we don't even know what's intelligence?

Not me, a nobel laurete called Demis Hassabis that's been working on the technology for decades. I just quoted his article.

 

[Edward Kenway]

Not me, a nobel laurete called Demis Hassabis that's been working on the technology for decades. I just quoted his article.

He's not on Elakiri and you are his water boy therefore question being pointed at you.

 

[dayt0na]

He's not on Elakiri and you are his water boy therefore question being pointed at you.

The question was directed at you by me, not the other way round.

 

[Edward Kenway]

The question was directed at you by me, not the other way round.

You are the one who's claiming that we will have AGI soon. How can we have AGI if we don't even know what's intelligence?

 

[dayt0na]

nice deflect.

 

[Edward Kenway]

nice deflect.

You are the one who's claiming that we will have AGI soon. How can we have AGI if we don't even know what's intelligence?

 

[PolHora]

never gonna happen, its all an illusion,

 

[හෙළයෙක්]

Perpetual Motion Machines එකක් කවුරු හරි හදනවා කිව්වොත් @dayt0na ගේ ප්‍රතිචාර කොහොමද?

 

[dayt0na]

Perpetual Motion Machines එකක් කවුරු හරි හදනවා කිව්වොත් @dayt0na ගේ ප්‍රතිචාර කොහොමද?

Oya labbewal wedak na bung…

Claude Code at this point for me is “almost” AGI. I can replace a human that was previously required to design and implement a software solution end to end and this wasn’t possible at all 1 year back. The trend lines are clear and the companies keep delivering better models.

I wouldn’t be surprised if they come up with a system that can outperform any human in any task/job that can be done from the other side of a screen over the next 2-3 years.

 

[හෙළයෙක්]

Oya labbewal wedak na bung…

Claude Code at this point for me is “almost” AGI. I can replace a human that was previously required to design and implement a software solution end to end and this wasn’t possible at all 1 year back. The trend lines are clear and the companies keep delivering better models.

I wouldn’t be surprised if they come up with a system that can outperform any human in any task/job that can be done from the other side of a screen over the next 2-3 years.

එහෙම බැලුවොත් calculators කියන්නෙත් AGi තමා.

 

[dayt0na]

එහෙම බැලුවොත් calculators කියන්නෙත් AGi තමා.

calculators can do one specific task very well, this is "General", that's the difference.

 

[Edward Kenway]

Oya labbewal wedak na bung…

Claude Code at this point for me is “almost” AGI. I can replace a human that was previously required to design and implement a software solution end to end and this wasn’t possible at all 1 year back. The trend lines are clear and the companies keep delivering better models.

I wouldn’t be surprised if they come up with a system that can outperform any human in any task/job that can be done from the other side of a screen over the next 2-3 years.

Okay so you don't understand AGI

 

[dayt0na]

Okay so you don't understand AGI

So what is AGI?

 

[Edward Kenway]

So what is AGI?

Claude is very specific to one domain, there is nothing "general" about it. This is ignoring how non of these tools are self aware and only capable of pattern matching.

 

[dayt0na]

Claude is very specific to one domain, there is nothing "general" about it. This is ignoring how non of these tools are self aware and only capable of pattern matching.

I asked what AGI is

 

[Edward Kenway]

I asked what AGI is

And i explained why Claude is not AGI

 

[dayt0na]

And i explained why Claude is not AGI

And I clearly explained that i won't be surprised if they come up with a system that can perform over all domains just like how Claude Code is working with software. It's AGI for me because it's the area that I can test their products on.

 

[Edward Kenway]

And I clearly explained that i won't be surprised if they come up with a system that can perform over all domains just like how Claude Code is working with software.

Based on your flawed understanding that Claude which is very specific is "almost" AGI. It's in the name, hard to miss.

 

[dayt0na]

Based on your flawed understanding that Claude which is very specific is "almost" AGI. It's in the name, hard to miss.

It isn't very specific actually. It can work across multiple domains. It's just that Anthropic chose to focus on the coding path because software has "verifiable outputs" and the easiest space to conquer with LLMS.

 

[Edward Kenway]

It isn't very specific actually. It can work across multiple domains. It's just that Anthropic chose to focus on the coding path because software has "verifiable outputs" and the easiest space to conquer with LLMS.

Again missing the G in AGI. Fact that Anthropic had to pick a specific domain is a strong sign. Besides if you think Claude is self aware then i don't know what to tell you.