ModiFied PCs

Anusha

Member
Jun 13, 2006
25,864
5
0
zCexVe said:
thats the same as i ma mind!!
but the thermal solution will spoil that out.:(:(
But can't help there. The thermal paste is required. There aren't 100% perfect surfaces (need them in heatsink as well as the CPU heatspreader).
 

Anusha

Member
Jun 13, 2006
25,864
5
0
zCexVe said:
Dont think i'm gonna argue with u.Just curious..:confused:
Why dont u like AMD?
The reasons most people give show pure idiocy, such as they don't like the name, they think AMD is slow, overheats, unstable. All are not 100% true. Intel has a nice name, yeah, but their CPUs were slow for the last couple of years, overheated like hell (thus unstable)..:rolleyes: :rolleyes:
 

Anusha

Member
Jun 13, 2006
25,864
5
0
zerocool said:
Intel was always stable...they didn't want to rush for anything..so they took their time and released INTEL CORE 2 DUO and bang...bye bye AMD...:yes: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Intel not rushing? Then what do you think AMD are doing? They are very slow to move to a new generation. Even the upcoming super chip from AMD is called K8L, not K9 or K10 (I heard that there won't be a K9). Still it's a K8, but with a considerable number of performance enhancements.
 

Anusha

Member
Jun 13, 2006
25,864
5
0
zCexVe said:
Can u buy me the Intel quad which performs best than AMD Athlon FX-62??
They r not affordable to us.I'm talkin about the normal market here with PD + C2D s with sempron+Athlon64+Athlon X2 s..
My dear, Intel's E6600 is faster than a FX62 in every benchmark. This is US$300 vs. US$600+ we are talking about!
 

Anusha

Member
Jun 13, 2006
25,864
5
0
zerocool said:
well best things are always high in price....and chap one has a hole in it...:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Do you ever wonder why AMD is cheaper....:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
Who says AMD is cheaper? AMD was cheaper, but when they gained the market, their CPUs were more expensive. The X2 3800 was over US$300 for a long time, when Intel's PentiumD 3GHz was less than that. Pricing is decided by the ruler! Intel can charge anything they want because their chips are better now. AMD have lowered their prices because they can't compete with Intel's CPUs.
 

Anusha

Member
Jun 13, 2006
25,864
5
0
zCexVe said:
I accept bro.U r correct.3D is the weakness of AMD.When comes to 3D they perform about 80% of Intel.If I was a 3D designer i'll use an Intel nomatter what.But When it comes to 2D,Gaming ,Video rendering it is AMD.Thats coz Intel use hyper threading
and AMD use Hyper Transport..[Not the names technologies r very much differ.In simple its like Parallel frm Intel and Serial frm AMD,not exact]
And remind u one thing,toms hardware is a great AMD fan too.They r powered by AMD Opteron...

Hey! No matter what the area is, Intel is faster NOW!!! AMD only had one advantage! Only one!!! Games!!! But now it's not on their hands! AMD can't win a thing now :no: But they have been a very good competitors, and will continue to be the same. Just give them some time. They'll come up with a solution oneway or the other (remember, ATI?).
 

zerocool

Member
Aug 18, 2006
3,192
0
0
Anusha said:
Hey! No matter what the area is, Intel is faster NOW!!! AMD only had one advantage! Only one!!! Games!!! But now it's not on their hands! AMD can't win a thing now :no: But they have been a very good competitors, and will continue to be the same. Just give them some time. They'll come up with a solution oneway or the other (remember, ATI?).

Do you think ATI is better than Nvidia :confused: :confused: :confused:

Well in my case Intel + Nvidia :yes: :yes: :yes: :yes: :yes: :yes: :yes:
 

Anusha

Member
Jun 13, 2006
25,864
5
0
zerocool said:
Do you think ATI is better than Nvidia :confused: :confused: :confused:

Well in my case Intel + Nvidia :yes: :yes: :yes: :yes: :yes: :yes: :yes:

ATI is not always better than nVidia because ATI is late on their flasgship products.
Eg:
6800Ultra vs X850XT
7800GTX vs. 1800XT
7900GTX vs. X1900XTX
7950X2 vs. X1950XTX

You know, in most cases, dual 7950X2 (i.e. quad SLI) is slower than dual X1950XTXs.

But the thing is, when AMD and ATI get together, thye can release a hybrid processor which, according to them, will give a boost of several steps! (not a few %, but a few integer multiples of the current performance). I wasn't talking about ATI alone.
 

shanX

Active member
  • Oct 4, 2006
    9,944
    2
    38
    Kandy, LK
    zerocool said:
    Well in my case Intel + Nvidia
    we're from the same club bro !
    11.gif
    11.gif
    11.gif
    11.gif
    11.gif
    11.gif
     
    Last edited:

    zCexVe

    Active member
  • Sep 12, 2006
    8,550
    22
    38
    Where I'm now
    Well I think We should start arguing on another thread,whole 2 pages of 30 posts
    wasted without a cool pic coz of Intel and AMD..I must support poor VIA with their C processors..Or Sun Spark may be :D :D
     

    zerocool

    Member
    Aug 18, 2006
    3,192
    0
    0
    zCexVe said:
    Well I think We should start arguing on another thread,whole 2 pages of 30 posts
    wasted without a cool pic coz of Intel and AMD..I must support poor VIA with their C processors..Or Sun Spark may be :D :D

    oh do not worry....this is ela kiri style...:yes: ;) :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
     

    shanX

    Active member
  • Oct 4, 2006
    9,944
    2
    38
    Kandy, LK
    just went hru the thread....

    zCexVe said:
    ZEROCOOL - no Heat sink for CPU, No cooling
    LGA - Leadless Grid Array which is used by ur CPU
    Bluwish green with zeroes means its still cool and near normal state
    :lol: then zCexVe means wt??
    PC_chart.jpg


    wow look at ma D920 :)
    it does 100+ than the D820 i wanted and PCH ppl billed ;) :) :lol:
    Tyre-01-june.gif