Firefox 2.0.0.6 in Ubuntu is blistering fast! I mean i dont know in mili seconds. Yet its faster in Ubuntu than using FF in Windows!
Ranhiru said:Firefox 2.0.0.6 in Ubuntu is blistering fast! I mean i dont know in mili seconds. Yet its faster in Ubuntu than using FF in Windows!



Opera developers say not to use this as the main browser. Currently this is a test build.SAN_APIIT said:Opera does the rendering faster that others, but is this version stable ????
Hey what about fire fox. i don't think any one is using IE neda....
Page rendering times and page loading times are two different things. It's the page loading times that matters the most, and to me, Firefox does a better job than Opera on my 512k connection. Sometimes Firefox loads pages in 10 seconds, and Opera can't even load the same page in 20 seconds...M@D$ said:is it seriouzly 5 times faster da??? machan
Flash doesn't work in Firefox x64, at least in Windows platform. Flash had worked in an old build (Fx 1.5.x days) for some people, but it doesn't work anymore.coolioWiZ said:Anusha >> did you get flash working on firefox 64bit?
Anusha said:Flash doesn't work in Firefox x64, at least in Windows platform. Flash had worked in an old build (Fx 1.5.x days) for some people, but it doesn't work anymore.

You can use Firefox x64 on Linux.coolioWiZ said:looks like we will have to wait until adobe officially release 64bit plugins for windows/os x/linux. I'll never use a browser if it can't play .flv files.
![]()
![]()
Anusha said:You can use Firefox x64 on Linux.
http://ketan.padegaonkar.name/2007/08/01/flash-player-on-64-bit-firefox-on-linux.html

Anusha said:RAM usage is no issue to me. All I need is peace of mind. Some sites are not compatible with Opera. Maybe it's not Opera's fault, but I can't help it.