Phenom II vs QX9650 @ 3.81Ghz

[¤--bACarDi--¤]

who said anything about 940/965? 920 is the way to go, and it OCs to 4GHz. 965 doesn't go any higher anyway.

and y do u think a cheap c2q system doesn't give awesome performance???

Yeah i agree.....
Core 2 Quads are now cheap(Q9550,Q9650) Becuz of Phenom II... U agree or not...?

Im not only talking abt the CPUs...But also the Dragon Platfom..It performs well...
Nehalem Platform not performs for the price... That Triple Channel is a holy Shit... No huge performance gain...Bt a fucking price...
Read here >>

I agree that Intel & AMD both r not perform well in DDR3
First Intel Mboards are damn slow with DDR3
And i heard abt AM3 is not perform well in DDR3

 

[Muzain]

?????

 

[Intel_Nehalem]

Yeah i agree.....
Core 2 Quads are now cheap(Q9550,Q9650) Becuz of Phenom II... U agree or not...?

Im not only talking abt the CPUs...But also the Dragon Platfom..It performs well...
Nehalem Platform not performs for the price... That Triple Channel is a holy Shit... No huge performance gain...Bt a fucking price...
Read here >>

I agree that Intel & AMD both r not perform well in DDR3
First Intel Mboards are damn slow with DDR3
And i heard abt AM3 is not perform well in DDR3

no huge performance gains? Intel Core i7s perform better in encoding videos and stuff like that and they are definetly more faster and better than C2Q or PhenomII and core i7's performance per watt is incredible
who said that triple channel DDR3 is shit? Haven't you seen some benchies?The memory bandwith is soooo large and better than AMD's Phenom II
Intel C2Qs don't perform that well with DDDR3 but i7s rock the world with tri-channel DDR3

 

[roshant]

no huge performance gains? Intel Core i7s perform better in encoding videos and stuff like that and they are definetly more faster and better than C2Q or PhenomII and core i7's performance per watt is incredible
who said that triple channel DDR3 is shit? Haven't you seen some benchies?The memory bandwith is soooo large and better than AMD's Phenom II
Intel C2Qs don't perform that well with DDDR3 but i7s rock the world with tri-channel DDR3

triple channel DDR3 is good except you have to buy 3 memory chips of same spec.

 

[Intel_Nehalem]

triple channel DDR3 is good except you have to buy 3 memory chips of same spec.

exactly bro
but when the DDR3 prices go down , it will be very cheap to do tri channel DDR3

 

[¤--bACarDi--¤]

no huge performance gains? Intel Core i7s perform better in encoding videos and stuff like that and they are definetly more faster and better than C2Q or PhenomII and core i7's performance per watt is incredible
who said that triple channel DDR3 is shit? Haven't you seen some benchies?The memory bandwith is soooo large and better than AMD's Phenom II
Intel C2Qs don't perform that well with DDDR3 but i7s rock the world with tri-channel DDR3

Ci7 shows Memory Bandwith for some synthetic bechieezzz....
but real world...In gaming i7 get f*cking time to load games...
Ckeck Youtube & see Core i7 EE guyz loading games...poor guyz

Tri - Channel is a shit in i7...All knows d@

 

[¤--bACarDi--¤]

exactly bro
but when the DDR3 prices go down , it will be very cheap to do tri channel DDR3

Never... If u using Tri-Channel U cnt use 4GB.... Only 3GB or 6GB
So 3 GB is not enough for gaming
6GB Tri-Channel kit cost $200

 

[Intel_Nehalem]

Ci7 shows Memory Bandwith for some synthetic bechieezzz....
but real world...In gaming i7 get f*cking time to load games...
Ckeck Youtube & see Core i7 EE guyz loading games...poor guyz

Tri - Channel is a shit in i7...All knows d@

bro i have nothing to say to you
do you believe those anomalities on youtube???

 

[Intel_Nehalem]

Never... If u using Tri-Channel U cnt use 4GB.... Only 3GB or 6GB
So 3 GB is not enough for gaming
6GB Tri-Channel kit cost $200

AND IF YOU WANT YOU CAN DO DUAL-CHANNEL DDR3 AS WELL !

 

[¤--bACarDi--¤]

AND IF YOU WANT YOU CAN DO DUAL-CHANNEL DDR3 AS WELL !

Dual Channel config in Tri-Channel Interface...WTF man...
Then why Dual channel use Single 4GB card in Tri channel interface...Its cheaper than Dual channel No...!!!

 

[Intel_Nehalem]

Dual Channel config in Tri-Channel Interface...WTF man...
Then why Dual channel use Single 4GB card in Tri channel interface...Its cheaper than Dual channel No...!!!

if you are very budget conscious you can definetly do dual channel DDR3 on a tri channel interface as well , even though it will result in a performance drop

 

[¤--bACarDi--¤]

if you are very budget conscious you can definetly do dual channel DDR3 on a tri channel interface as well , even though it will result in a performance drop

 

[Intel_Nehalem]

hardcore AMD fanboism

 

[Anusha]

Ci7 shows Memory Bandwith for some synthetic bechieezzz....
but real world...In gaming i7 get f*cking time to load games...
Ckeck Youtube & see Core i7 EE guyz loading games...poor guyz

Tri - Channel is a shit in i7...All knows d@

So did AMD chips when they implemented IMC + HTT. People then said AMD's mem performance is awesome. Yeah, in synthetic benches.
I don't understand why people treat same features of different companies differently.

I still believe huge BW is useless (AMD or Intel doesn't matter who it is!!). Core2's mem latency was lower than AMD's for crying out loud! That's on so called "old" FSB. LOL. Still people said it was crap because it is "old technology"!

 

[Anusha]

Never... If u using Tri-Channel U cnt use 4GB.... Only 3GB or 6GB
So 3 GB is not enough for gaming
6GB Tri-Channel kit cost $200

But did you forget that you only need 3 sticks of RAM to get to 6GB on Intel platform, compared to 4 sticks on the AMD platform? More sticks = higher price + higher power draw.

Can you get 12GB on an AMD platform (cos there aren't 4GB DDR3 sticks afaik)? No! But you can on an Intel platform

LOL. Everything is relative.

 

[Anusha]

I still can't believe you missed this!
http://www.anandtech.com/mb/showdoc.aspx?i=3506&p=3

Where Ci7 (920 ) rapes the Phenom 940 *in games*. Overclocked of course. And did you hear that you can't OC a Phenom past 4GHz on x64 platform (at least for now)? ROFLMAO

 

[Intel_Nehalem]

I still can't believe you missed this!
http://www.anandtech.com/mb/showdoc.aspx?i=3506&p=3

Where Ci7 (920 ) rapes the Phenom 940 *in games*. Overclocked of course. And did you hear that you can't OC a Phenom past 4GHz on x64 platform (at least for now)? ROFLMAO

this fellow can't understand the difference between ci7 and PhenomII yet

 

[¤--bACarDi--¤]

So did AMD chips when they implemented IMC + HTT. People then said AMD's mem performance is awesome. Yeah, in synthetic benches.
I don't understand why people treat same features of different companies differently.

I still believe huge BW is useless (AMD or Intel doesn't matter who it is!!). Core2's mem latency was lower than AMD's for crying out loud! That's on so called "old" FSB. LOL. Still people said it was crap because it is "old technology"!

I know..!! Synthetics are showing Higher Memory Bandwith in i7...
Bt i hav seen Warhead & Farcry 2 Loading in i7s....
I7 get big time to load games....while Core 2 loads before that too..

 

[Anusha]

I know..!! Synthetics are showing Higher Memory Bandwith in i7...
Bt i hav seen Warhead & Farcry 2 Loading in i7s....
I7 get big time to load games....while Core 2 loads before that too..

Loading times? I don't think you could relate that to CPU

 

[¤--bACarDi--¤]

But did you forget that you only need 3 sticks of RAM to get to 6GB on Intel platform, compared to 4 sticks on the AMD platform? More sticks = higher price + higher power draw.

Can you get 12GB on an AMD platform (cos there aren't 4GB DDR3 sticks afaik)? No! But you can on an Intel platform

LOL. Everything is relative.

LOL... U knw when Far Cry 2(In full graphics) load to memory...Only get 3GB..
So who wants 6GB or 12GB... And 6GB kit cost $200
Bt u cnt survive with 3GB... 4GB enough bt doesnt fit on Tri-channel (Plz dnt say use Dual on Tri Interface )