Radeon HD 4870 X2, HD 4850 X2 Faster and Better Than GeForce GTX 295, 285: AMD

Intel_Nehalem

Active member
  • Jun 7, 2008
    1,454
    3
    38
    Pannipitiya
    Bigspin said:
    Crysis is not a well optimised game...Actually it's optimised for nVIDIA (Except Warhead which perform better than first title with every hardware)

    nVIDIA paid $4+ millions to get that optimised for nVIDIA right :)
    really? thanks for the info :) (I knew that it was optimised for nvidia but they paid 4 million for that lol :lol: )
     

    ¤--bACarDi--¤

    Well-known member
  • Jan 9, 2009
    12,130
    288
    83
    124.43.xxx.xxx
    Intel_Nehalem said:
    yes and the GTX295 looses because it is limited by memory :nerd:
    If it had the same amount of memory then the GTx295 would have beat it at that resolution?

    I want to ask you a question
    Do most gamers play with those settings? 2560x1600 8xAA 16xAF
    Most people play with 1920x1200, 1680x1050 and at 1280x720/1280x1024 and at those resoultions, the GTx 295 is the best for them :dull:

    hey hey....!
    wot r u talking....Ah...?
    First of all i talk abt memory problem..
    i knw when Resolution increase it get a huge memory space, But
    i think u saw d@ 295 getting worse when switching AA 4X to 8X in same Resolution....So AA capability is not depend on memory size huh... Its GPU speed:rolleyes:

    And dnt u like to play games with full AA in 2560 X 1600 Ah...?:baffled:
    Have u played with 8X AA.... Its amazing

    And i cnt realize why u r supporting to nVidia...
    Still they got huge price tags:no:
    But when ATI compete nVidia cuting & cutting their damn prices:rofl:
     

    bhai4uanu

    Active member
  • Jun 6, 2008
    1,162
    8
    38
    ¤--bACarDi--¤ said:
    hey hey....!
    wot r u talking....Ah...?
    First of all i talk abt memory problem..
    i knw when Resolution increase it get a huge memory space, But
    i think u saw d@ 295 getting worse when switching AA 4X to 8X in same Resolution....So AA capability is not depend on memory size huh... Its GPU speed:rolleyes:

    And dnt u like to play games with full AA in 2560 X 1600 Ah...?:baffled:
    Have u played with 8X AA.... Its amazing

    And i cnt realize why u r supporting to nVidia...
    Still they got huge price tags:no:
    But when ATI compete nVidia cuting & cutting their damn prices:rofl:
    :baffled::baffled::rofl::rofl:
     

    Intel_Nehalem

    Active member
  • Jun 7, 2008
    1,454
    3
    38
    Pannipitiya
    ¤--bACarDi--¤ said:
    hey hey....!
    wot r u talking....Ah...?
    First of all i talk abt memory problem..
    i knw when Resolution increase it get a huge memory space, But
    i think u saw d@ 295 getting worse when switching AA 4X to 8X in same Resolution....So AA capability is not depend on memory size huh... Its GPU speed:rolleyes:

    And dnt u like to play games with full AA in 2560 X 1600 Ah...?:baffled:
    Have u played with 8X AA.... Its amazing

    And i cnt realize why u r supporting to nVidia...
    Still they got huge price tags:no:
    But when ATI compete nVidia cuting & cutting their damn prices:rofl:
    Dx 10.1 is vey good in AA And AF that is why the HD4x00 series is good at that.
    but wait! i love price wars, we will be able to buy excellent VGAs for a lot less!
    AND I DON'T SUPPORT NVIDIA!
    Without AMD/ATi we wouldnt be able to buy stuff for cheap from either intel or nvidia :P
    and i personally like to see how larrabee would perform!:rofl:
     

    ¤--bACarDi--¤

    Well-known member
  • Jan 9, 2009
    12,130
    288
    83
    124.43.xxx.xxx
    Intel_Nehalem said:
    Dx 10.1 is vey good in AA And AF that is why the HD4x00 series is good at that.
    but wait! i love price wars, we will be able to buy excellent VGAs for a lot less!
    AND I DON'T SUPPORT NVIDIA!
    Without AMD/ATi we wouldnt be able to buy stuff for cheap from either intel or nvidia :P
    and i personally like to see how larrabee would perform!:rofl:

    :P :P
     

    madurax86

    Member
    Jun 29, 2006
    4,385
    88
    0
    oh geforsaurus is trying to get on pace, they NOW going to release GDDR5? ..whoo that kept alot of geforce fans waiting or too long they might have switched to ATI may be. ATI lies and performs well and its cheaper :P
     

    kovida_xp

    Junior member
  • Oct 29, 2007
    655
    6
    18
    Intel_Nehalem said:
    AMD started its marketing offensive against NVIDIA's new dual-GPU GeForce GTX 295, and single-GPU GeForce GTX 285 accelerators, in an attempt to put the Radeon HD 4800 X2 series accelerators ahead of its competition in terms of performance on a "broad scale", and used the cards' availability in non-reference designs as a USP against NVIDIA's offerings using a uniform company-specified design. All this, in an internal presentation leaked to Donanim Haber. As for those wondering why, ATI and NVIDIA have a history of picking on each others' flagship products by means of such presentations, with which they intend to influence OEMs and channel vendors, though it always happens so, that these presentations reach public domains. Viral marketing or something plausible? Find out for yourself:

    Source :TPU

    150b.jpg


    150c.jpg


    150d.jpg


    150e.jpg


    150f.jpg


    150g.jpg


    150h.jpg


    150i.jpg


    150j.jpg


    AMD people are damn liars :growl: :no:
    Discuss this article here

    Its GDDR5 against GDDR3 what did you expect? and The 4850X2 is 2xGPU version where GTX285 is only a single GPU version no point of arguing with 2x the power with only 1x
     
    Last edited:

    zCexVe

    Active member
  • Sep 12, 2006
    8,550
    22
    38
    Where I'm now
    These results are from a very high res that the 2GB GDDR5 of radeon gets the upper hand.We all know that this is some marketing BS from AMD,as we seen in the past by nVIDIA.THese things happen..But we all know by our reviews that GTX 295 is the winner in performance.
     

    gayannr

    Member
    Sep 29, 2006
    3,479
    4
    0
    The City of Lost Heaven
    madurax86 said:
    oh geforsaurus is trying to get on pace, they NOW going to release GDDR5? ..whoo that kept alot of geforce fans waiting or too long they might have switched to ATI may be. ATI lies and performs well and its cheaper :P
    This is damn funny.. u guys shud see this..
    just for fun.. no offense :D
    G4saurus