Should Athula Siriwardane be banned from EK?

Should AthulaSiriwardane be banned from EK?

  • Yes, ban the bugger for good

    Votes: 118 54.1%
  • Ban him temporarily

    Votes: 17 7.8%
  • He is OK, Let him be there

    Votes: 83 38.1%

  • Total voters
    218
  • Poll closed .

gayan kalhara

Member
Nov 22, 2007
7,060
48
0
Wal Bada said:
Maarayi. Ehenam api yuddel nawaththala sil redda andan kiyamu api LTTE wage neweyi, api upasaka kiyala:rofl:

eekiyanne oya kiyana vidiyata apith ee paaharayange gaanatama vatenna oone kiyalada?. civil minissu maranna oone kiyalada? pas bami gahanna oone kiyalada? boru prachaara geniyanna oone kiyalada?

sarin sare apema minissu athara bombs pupurwanna oone kiyalada?

:lol::lol::rofl::rofl: ungei apei thiyenna oone venasa eekai. oya kiyanava. ee venasa oone nathilu.

ithin dan kawuda KOTIYA? :P

Wal Bada said:
He's not with a point. What he does is only blind bashing of the government in 3/4 of his threads and SLA in 1/4 of his threads. His "points" does not make sense. ANd he does not answer when his views are challenged, but just wriggles away like a spineless worm. If he posts something from Al Jazeera here, he is responsible for the content of it. He cannot put false news and then keep silent after the news is disproved. He should correct it in his original threads.
Why don't you ask him to use it?

you are doing the same thing again. u catch da probs tale. nt da head :lol:
 

rustyc

Member
Nov 16, 2008
2,494
32
0
One step away from hell
Wal Bada said:
well machan u got some kinda point
but if he is to be banned i think da whole EK rules shud be altered befre he is banned
cuz there is no rule dat da topic shud be n some kinda frame
in dat case i'v seen tons of threads in EK which are not at ol relevent to da text wit in

bdw "kiyanna kese keewath asanna sihibuddiyen asiya yuthui" kiyala misak "asannaate sarilana lese kiyanna katha kele yuthui" kiyala api kisi kenekte ugannela naa nede???;)

meyage thread kiyawana kattiya thara ganne ake ayage waraddak neveine
its true dat his thread and topics provoke many
but dats nt his mistake.

im not telling dat he shud keep on doin it.as a responsible adult he shud act in a much more mature manner.bt still others shud know to control thm selves.not just shout filth and act as clowns.
wat will happen if others either challange his points in a manly way or just ignore his thread???
thn da treads wont hit in google will it????
if some one say da majority in EK are teens and athula as an adult shud set an exampl not provoke th,yeh its tru but on the other side da teens either shud control thm selves or quit until thy can do so
 

Wal Bada

Well-known member
  • rustyc said:
    well machan u got some kinda point
    but if he is to be banned i think da whole EK rules shud be altered befre he is banned
    cuz there is no rule dat da topic shud be n some kinda frame
    in dat case i'v seen tons of threads in EK which are not at ol relevent to da text wit in
    There is a bigger rule that over-rule every rule and regulation in EK. That is SL constitution. Since EKs admins are Lankans who are living in SL, they are bound by the constitution not to promote or allow any thing that harms the sovereignty of the country. If some one is really interested, they can pull up GTRZ or Lich to the courts on this and close down EK by a magistrate order. (And mind you, politicians are that stupid to do a thing like that). No one of us wants that to happen. Nip it at the bud before it becomes a problem.

    bdw "kiyanna kese keewath asanna sihibuddiyen asiya yuthui" kiyala misak "asannaate sarilana lese kiyanna katha kele yuthui" kiyala api kisi kenekte ugannela naa nede???;)
    Are you allowed to use blasphemous and filth in public? should be yes according to your argument.

    meyage thread kiyawana kattiya thara ganne ake ayage waraddak neveine
    its true dat his thread and topics provoke many
    but dats nt his mistake.
    Lets put the provoking part aside. Then what about lies that he posts?

    wat will happen if others either challange his points in a manly way or just ignore his thread???
    thn da treads wont hit in google will it????
    He does not answer them. Wriggles out of it like a ground worm.
     

    damannaked

    Member
    Aug 3, 2007
    885
    2
    0
    Sri lanka, Wattala..
    Dont bring government politics here.. plsss..

    having a different view doesnt mean he shud b banned...

    if he shud b banned then ppl like coolgayathra etc shud be banned for posting pro government stuff..

    for sure v kno who is athula... so no need to banned him
     

    kosandpol

    Well-known member
  • Jun 10, 2008
    45,329
    1,492
    113
    Wal Bada said:
    There is a bigger rule that over-rule every rule and regulation in EK. That is SL constitution. Since EKs admins are Lankans who are living in SL, they are bound by the constitution not to promote or allow any thing that harms the sovereignty of the country. If some one is really interested, they can pull up GTRZ or Lich to the courts on this and close down EK by a magistrate order. (And mind you, politicians are that stupid to do a thing like that). No one of us wants that to happen. Nip it at the bud before it becomes a problem.
    Actually, this is wrong. Since the Site is hosted in USA, it has to obey US law. Not SL law. The only thing SL can do is ban access to the site like they do to tamilnet.

    Wal Bada said:
    Are you allowed to use blasphemous and filth in public? should be yes according to your argument.
    Blasphemy, by definition is 2 sided. Think about that as well. As for fith in public, the replies the others have posted are really far more filthy.
     

    rustyc

    Member
    Nov 16, 2008
    2,494
    32
    0
    One step away from hell
    Wal Bada said:
    There is a bigger rule that over-rule every rule and regulation in EK. That is SL constitution. Since EKs admins are Lankans who are living in SL, they are bound by the constitution not to promote or allow any thing that harms the sovereignty of the country. If some one is really interested, they can pull up GTRZ or Lich to the courts on this and close down EK by a magistrate order. (And mind you, politicians are that stupid to do a thing like that). No one of us wants that to happen. Nip it at the bud before it becomes a problem.

    watz da rule dat athula broke which cud even ban EK for ever
    now give da point wit profe


    Wal Bada said:
    Are you allowed to use blasphemous and filth in public? should be yes according to your argument.
    well for that there is a rule ther it self in EK saying not to use filth
    so you shud obey da rule
    if ya toking in public haven't you seen ppl toking filth in public???
    even da amy and da police????

    well i have
    still we criticise da act cuz its off da limts of our culture
    but since you oly mentioned "public"
    well in europian countries you see it more commen


    Wal Bada said:
    Lets put the provoking part aside. Then what about lies that he posts?
    profe pls????
    profe dat HE created lies and posted here k


    Wal Bada said:
    He does not answer them. Wriggles out of it like a ground worm.
    well now is dat da point you bring out to ban him???
    ur point was dat he is posting provokative stuff which goes to google and yahoo and dats ban and pro LTTE
    not answering ya qus in a prob wit his personality
     

    Wal Bada

    Well-known member
  • kosandpol said:
    Actually, this is wrong. Since the Site is hosted in USA, it has to obey US law. Not SL law. The only thing SL can do is ban access to the site like they do to tamilnet.
    I don't know where GTRZ lives. If he lives in SL, he'll held responsible. Even your best case scenario is scary. 75% of members of EK are in SL. I can't even think of somebody blocking EK!!::eek:


    Blasphemy, by definition is 2 sided. Think about that as well. As for fith in public, the replies the others have posted are really far more filthy.
    Don't complicate the things. If you shout in filth you are bound to be answered in filth. But what you do is pull up the guys who answered in filth without pulling up the one who used it first hand. There's only one possible way, you can't use filth although you have freedom of expression. You can have your political agenda, but, you can't cross the boundaries defined by the constitution of SL
     

    rustyc

    Member
    Nov 16, 2008
    2,494
    32
    0
    One step away from hell
    Wal Bada said:
    Yes, but please read what it symbolically means here. Don't take it literally.
    well da prob is some ones shouting filth first hand in ATHULA's threads in da literal meaning and its definetly not him.is dat correct and according to rules???? :rolleyes::rolleyes:

    just say is it according to rules and is it correct???
     

    chathwan

    Member
    Aug 29, 2008
    950
    9
    0
    umbata wagema meke anith membrzlatath puluwam eyalage adahas prakasha karanna.
    umbala anduwata denna yanawane ban nikan mokkuda wage
    :P