Why the RAT Changes Everything – Air India 171 Update

hrm

Well-known member
  • Mar 19, 2008
    5,987
    3,443
    113
    Battaramulla, Sri Lanka
    Saw this in FB. AAIB - India preliminary report findings.

    Flight: AI-171 | Aircraft: Boeing 787-8 | Date: June 25, 2025 | Route: Ahmedabad (VAAH) → London Heathrow (EGLL)
    Crash Site: ~1.2 km from VAAH Runway 23, post-V1 and rotation.
    🛠️
    AAIB Preliminary Report Highlights
    1. Primary Cause – Electrical Power Transfer Interruption (PTI) During Rotation
    • During transition from ground to airborne electrical configuration, the aircraft experienced a cascading dual-engine FADEC (Full Authority Digital Engine Control) failure.
    • Root cause: Uncommanded bus transfer failure due to arcing in the main power relay box (PRB-A), traced to water ingress during pre-flight GPU disconnection in heavy rain.
    • This led to loss of electronic engine control at rotation, resulting in both GEnx engines rolling back to ground idle within 4–5 seconds.
    2. Flight Data Record Timeline
    • +0:11 sec: Nose gear lifts off.
    • +0:13 sec: Sudden engine rollback begins. Thrust reduces from 92% N1 to <27% within 3 seconds.
    • +0:16 sec: Master caution + ENG FAIL L/R warnings. FO calls, “Both engines dropping!”
    • +0:20 sec: Autopilot and flight control reverts to Direct Mode. Pitch up attitude peaks at 18°.
    • +0:25 sec: Aircraft stalls at 186 ft AGL.
    • +0:30 sec: Full aerodynamic stall; nose drops rapidly.
    • +0:38 sec: Ground impact at 54° nose-down attitude, 174 knots.
    Contributing Factors
    • Environmental Conditions:
    • Torrential rain during pushback.
    • Moisture intrusion into PRB-A connector (P/N: HLN8471) — a known corrosion-risk component.
    • Latent Maintenance Issue:
    • Power transfer relay unit showed signs of thermal damage in a previous MEL deferral 2 weeks prior.
    • No replacement had been conducted; aircraft was cleared under repetitive deferral.
    • Design Oversight:
    • Boeing 787 has no physical engine control backup (i.e., no direct mechanical linkage in FADEC loss scenario).
    • Loss of power supply to both EEC channels resulted in engine “freeze” at ground idle instead of flameout.
    • Flight Crew Response:
    • Attempted engine relight sequence not completed before stall onset.
    • Emergency power selector not activated — possibly due to confusion from multiple ECAM warnings.

    @imhotep what do you think? Is that plausible?
    ------ Post added on Jun 18, 2025 at 10:05 AM
     

    imhotep

    Well-known member
  • Mar 29, 2017
    14,833
    8
    35,357
    113
    Saw this in FB. AAIB - India preliminary report findings.

    Flight: AI-171 | Aircraft: Boeing 787-8 | Date: June 25, 2025 | Route: Ahmedabad (VAAH) → London Heathrow (EGLL)
    Crash Site: ~1.2 km from VAAH Runway 23, post-V1 and rotation.
    🛠️
    AAIB Preliminary Report Highlights
    1. Primary Cause – Electrical Power Transfer Interruption (PTI) During Rotation
    • During transition from ground to airborne electrical configuration, the aircraft experienced a cascading dual-engine FADEC (Full Authority Digital Engine Control) failure.
    • Root cause: Uncommanded bus transfer failure due to arcing in the main power relay box (PRB-A), traced to water ingress during pre-flight GPU disconnection in heavy rain.
    • This led to loss of electronic engine control at rotation, resulting in both GEnx engines rolling back to ground idle within 4–5 seconds.
    2. Flight Data Record Timeline
    • +0:11 sec: Nose gear lifts off.
    • +0:13 sec: Sudden engine rollback begins. Thrust reduces from 92% N1 to <27% within 3 seconds.
    • +0:16 sec: Master caution + ENG FAIL L/R warnings. FO calls, “Both engines dropping!”
    • +0:20 sec: Autopilot and flight control reverts to Direct Mode. Pitch up attitude peaks at 18°.
    • +0:25 sec: Aircraft stalls at 186 ft AGL.
    • +0:30 sec: Full aerodynamic stall; nose drops rapidly.
    • +0:38 sec: Ground impact at 54° nose-down attitude, 174 knots.
    Contributing Factors
    • Environmental Conditions:
    • Torrential rain during pushback.
    • Moisture intrusion into PRB-A connector (P/N: HLN8471) — a known corrosion-risk component.
    • Latent Maintenance Issue:
    • Power transfer relay unit showed signs of thermal damage in a previous MEL deferral 2 weeks prior.
    • No replacement had been conducted; aircraft was cleared under repetitive deferral.
    • Design Oversight:
    • Boeing 787 has no physical engine control backup (i.e., no direct mechanical linkage in FADEC loss scenario).
    • Loss of power supply to both EEC channels resulted in engine “freeze” at ground idle instead of flameout.
    • Flight Crew Response:
    • Attempted engine relight sequence not completed before stall onset.
    • Emergency power selector not activated — possibly due to confusion from multiple ECAM warnings.
    As usual b!@#$t from the Fakebook, eveything is fake including the date < | Date: June 25, 2025 > :ROFLMAO:

    There was another one indicating the pilot seat moved forward. Fake report using another incident.
    The recent LATAM Airlines Boeing 787 - 9, March 11, 2024 Flight Sydney to Auckland. The aircraft entered into a dive but recovered. The pilot was pushed into the control column.

    Never trust anything in the Fakebook. Sorry :unsure:
     

    imhotep

    Well-known member
  • Mar 29, 2017
    14,833
    8
    35,357
    113
    Lol didn't saw the date. However it came from a aircraft maintenance engineer at Easyjet so thought it's somewhat true.
    Careful if you fly Easyjet. :ROFLMAO:


    ------ Post added on Jun 18, 2025 at 10:28 AM
     
    • Haha
    Reactions: hrm

    Smartm

    Well-known member
  • Jul 19, 2008
    19,884
    20,421
    113
    හස්තිශෛලපුර
    ඔව් human error තියෙනවා Flaps Reacte කරගන්නේ නැතිව Landing Gear දෙකත් Down කරගෙන යන්න මොනවා හරි ලොකු හේතුවක් තියෙන්න ඕනේ එක වැරැද්දක් නම් ඒක Human Error කියන්න පුළුවන් ඒත් Well Experience Pilots ලා දෙන්නෙක්ම ඉන්න Flight එකක් මෙහෙම වෙන්න බැහැ නේද
    Dabayo nam kochchara expert unat sure na..
     
    • Haha
    Reactions: 2osama

    2osama

    Well-known member
  • Oct 25, 2010
    81,314
    72,500
    113
    මාලඹේ
    Dabayo nam kochchara expert unat sure na..
    ඔය Air India පරණ Flight එකකට නැගලා බලපන් ඇතුලට ගියපු ගමන් බය හිතෙනවා😂
    ඔවා අහසේ නෙවෙයි පාරේ යන්න වත් හොඳ තත්වයක නෑ😁

    එහෙම එකක් අහසේ අරගෙන යනවා කියන්නේ ම වීර කමක් බං 😂

    උන්ගේ ඇතුලේ Service එක එහෙම මාර හොදයි Pilots ලාගේත් අවුලක් නැහැ අවුල තියෙන්නේ Flights Maintenance වල
     

    Monkey D Dragon

    Well-known member
  • Sep 22, 2024
    5,967
    6,378
    113
    East Blue (Goa Kingdom)
    Ehenam records නෑ..

    ඔව්. පුළුවං. හැබැයි ඒක engine එකක් fail උනහම පැත්තට වාංගු වෙනවා (bank වෙනවා) මොකද එන්ජින් එක නැති පැත්තේ thrust එක නැති වෙනවා. Engine එක run වෙන පැත්තේ thrust එක වැඩි වෙනවා.. එක නිසා engine එක නැති පැත්තට plane එක bank වෙනවා.
    But මේ incident එකේ එහෙම වෙන්නේ නෑ. කෙලින් ගිහිල්ලා වදින්නේ..

    නෑ බං
    https://shop.boeing.com/aviation-supply/p/100-3020-100=IE
    In addition to the FDR , the RIPS battery directly powers the Cockpit area mic AND an independent 3 axis accelerometer assembly (this is on an MPFR on the part 91 helicopters I work on - don't know what's required for part 121 & 135 )






    beoing 787 ekaka aniwa athi helicopters walath thiyena eke,
    + engine eken power loss unoth ewalema RIPS ekata maru wenna athi
    mokada godak crashes wenne flight land karaddi or take off karaddi



    http://rpcaero.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Radiant-Type-III-RIPS-Final-11-2-21.pdf
     
    Last edited:
    • Like
    Reactions: scorpion MW