බයියන්ගේ වීරයෝ ගොඩක් මේ වගේ තමා..View attachment 225989
seems like it all amounts to a wet fart at the end of the day, just like your post
Latest ads
-
ASUS TUF TX5 Pro LAPTOP- gtechexpress
- Updated:
-
CEB & Reload 15% off- pdkitdept
- Updated:
-
Perplexity AI Pro - 12 Months- hrdilshan.madushanka
- Updated:
-
Kurunegala Land for sale in Kurunegala City
- MemoryHacker
- Updated:
-
වේයන්ගොඩ නගරයෙන් ඉඩමක් සොයන ඔබට
- lahiru2000
- Updated:
කලු කුහර නැත, පට්ටපල් බොරුවකි-නලියන සිල්වා
- Thread starter ewijesekara
- Start date
what does peer reviewing has anything to do with anythingDo you know what peer reviewing is? If you knew you wouldn't ask me that. You can ask your collegue to peer review your sht and that doesn't mean anything because they are not going to see if your theory is 100 correct. Once you publish you get your feedback from experts all over the world. That only happens if what you said has any meaning to the field. You can take it or leave it. In this case I think Nalin chose the latter
Is that what you think peer review process is? what an idiot! your colleagues are actually actively filtered by the editor/ sub editor of the journal!
Specially in high impact journals like Science and Nature the peer review process is extremely thorough and critical of the content, and the editorial board will make sure the opponents of the said theory are included in the peer review panel, including international experts. Apart from that, for any journal, peer reviewers should notify if one has a "conflict of interest", that includes receiving a joint funding with an author of a manuscript."asking colleagues to peer review a Nature manuscript??" yeah right! what a bloody joker!
Last edited:
Who the f was asking about peer reviewing by a Nature journal
Is that what you think peer review process is? what an idiot! your colleagues are actually actively filtered by the editor/ sub editor of the journal!
"asking colleagues to peer review a Nature manuscript??" yeah right! what a bloody joker!
If you go to researchgate this publication is not even reviewed yet there so you can argue that this journal was not even given proper attention to When you think peer reviewing validates all the content of a paper it made my day. Even Stephen Hawking later in life said his published paper (with peer review ) which got him his doctorate was so wrong. This is theoritical physics, not experimental physics. On top of that we are talking about blackholes which are proven to exist already. Welcome to science and also to 2024. I agree that Nalin De Silva is a joker. Atleast you got that right He presented an old paper (where he accepted the existence of blackholes and got published but now says it's an incomplete theory) and now says blackholes doesn't exist at all. Try your best to back that amigo. After his latest post even Nature Physics should be embarrassed by now to publish an incomplete theory 'which they peer reviewed the hell out of'
PS - https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/07/science/superconductor-retraction-nature-paper.html
When the topic is hot and the paper is wrong it gets the heat immidiately. When nobody takes you seriously it can stay on the internet.
The read this article very carefully
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-03974-8
Lecture us how peer reviewing works again? By the way how many papers have you published?
Look at the number of retraction by the Nature Journal. I think you need to redo the BSc.
PS 2 - I read the post again after finding out that Nature Journal doesn't like to publish theoritical stuff and immediately noticed that this bugger says he sent the paper to Nature Journal but fails to mention whether it got published it or not. This like Derana news. I think it never got reviewed nor published. If it was published this crazy person wouldn't have let us hear the end of it and he would have posted the links to Nature Journal article instead of Research Square article, even there it says it's not reviewed yet
So we are debating here about nonsense by an egotistical buffoon. So Nature Journal was saved that day. Nalin Silva worshipers, feel free to carry on
Last edited:
Ha ha... I thought responding along the same lines and decided not to, since I just recalled the famous quotation " Never argue with fools. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.”
Is that what you think peer review process is? what an idiot! your colleagues are actually actively filtered by the editor/ sub editor of the journal!
"asking colleagues to peer review a Nature manuscript??" yeah right! what a bloody joker!
It is obvious the sad soul has not been to a proper Uni, let alone to grad school or publishing. According to the guy "Nature" or Nature physics" is just a another platform! , and he conveniently forget to say anything about impact factor (probably still reading what is on wiki
) Any person with a decent education should know that high impact factor journals have their papers cited more, hence discussed more in the science community.Anyway the guy seem to be in high gear "damage controlling" and back tracking tying to eat his own words, yeah I know, it is fun to watch how they react, when you expose these "I know all pundits".
යකෝ අහමඩ්! කබ්බෝ ෆෝම් කරලා ආතල් ගන්ඩ එපා! !
Last edited:
අඩෝ නයි ලියන සිල්වා, එතකොට මිල්කි වේ ගැලැක්සි එක මැද්දෙ තියෙන්නෙ උඹේ අම්මගෙ හුත්තද?
නයි ලියන සිල්වා බයි පොන්නයාට රාජපක්ක පල් හොරා ගේ සරම උස්සලා බැළුවා නම් කළු කුහරේ බලාගන්න තිබුනා .
.
මුගේ අනුගාමිකයෙක් හිටිය කිරියේ පුක්කි ගායිස් ද මොකක්ද එකා.
"නැත" කියන අන්තයෙන් එහෙම එකක් නෑ කියල නෙවෙ එයා කීවෙ..
ඇත කියන අන්තෙන් ඇත්තෙත් නෑ, නැත අන්තෙන් නැත්තෙත් නෑ...
ගොඩක් ගැබුරු කතාවක් prof කීවේ... තේරෙන් නෑ හැමෝටම
කුලක කතාව වගේ එකක් ද? නැත්නම් අර මුකුත් නෑ පුටුවක් නම් පුටුව නෑ අංශු ගොඩක් විතරයි වගේ එකක් ද?
මම හිතන විදියට බුද්ධිමත් වෙන්න වෙන්න ටැක් පනින සීන් එකක් වගේ ඊගෝ එකක් සෙට් වෙනවා බහුතරයකට..
මෙයා Peradeniya හිටපු maths කාරයේ නේ ද, අවුරුදු එකහමාරක් කින් PhD කරා කියලා ටිකක් ආඩම්බරයෙන් හිටපු කෙනෙක්.Seriously? You know how difficult to get something published in Nature or Nature Physics? u for real ?
