ALZIP- zip witharak newei...

[coolioWiZ]

Suggestion:
motta patikki.

 

[Anusha]

Ouch....my back aches ROFLing

 

[mkranga]

Java : bytecode interpreter
Delphi: Compiler
C/C++: Compiler
VB: you can choose to intepret (Pcode) or convert to native code.

You mean speed of
c/c++=Delphi

and/or

c\c++ = vb

I’m not a gini but….
You have lot more to know sis. And I wana change this style that we smile others.

Wars thing is, I can’t give you all of my knowledge in second.
Try to understand this

Vb can’t hit Delphi speed
Delphi can’t hit C++
C++ cant C
Java > eek (in case if speed only)

For designing a compression algorithm you need knowledge in system design tools like UML, don't ask me how to use UML (I suck at it) and then you can use any language to implement. I'll suggest C++

let it go, I’m a math’s player.

 

[mkranga]

your 7zip 32 bit da 64 bit da

 

[coolioWiZ]

let it go, I’m a math’s player.

Then you are suitable for working on compression algorithms and encryption algorithms.

You mean speed of
c/c++=Delphi

and/or

c\c++ = vb

I’m not a gini but….
You have lot more to know sis. And I wana change this style that we smile others.

Wars thing is, I can’t give you all of my knowledge in second.
Try to understand this

Vb can’t hit Delphi speed
Delphi can’t hit C++
C++ cant C
Java > eek (in case if speed only)

Java is easy to code and master and also crossplatform, but has performace problems due to it's intepreted nature.
VB is the easiest way to deploy programs on the windows platform (performace is ok) but as you see it is not crossplatform. [you may try to run .net programs on linux with mono]

I've not used Delphi, so I don't know a thing about it. (heard most delphi developers now prefer C#). Surely C/C++ is fast but Assembly will be faster and machine code will be the fastest you can go. (unless you can manually switch electric potentials at warp speed on the processor).

Now to the point.
My previous post doesn't mean all compilers have same speed, and all interpreters have same speed.
delphi and c++ using compilers doesn't mean they are same in performace, performace of a computer language will depend on the coding and how far the specific compiler is optimised for the task. Taking for example the C++ compilers Visual C++ and gcc (g++) will compile C++ code but you will find somewhat different performance.

 

[mkranga]

Then you are suitable for working on compression algorithms and encryption algorithms.

Konde badapu chinnunta hodai. don't forget we r in 2007.

Java is easy to code and master and also crossplatform, but has performace problems due to it's intepreted nature.
VB is the easiest way to deploy programs on the windows platform (performace is ok) but as you see it is not crossplatform. [you may try to run .net programs on linux with mono]

I've not used Delphi, so I don't know a thing about it. (heard most delphi developers now prefer C#). Surely C/C++ is fast but Assembly will be faster and machine code will be the fastest you can go. (unless you can manually switch electric potentials at warp speed on the processor).

Now to the point.
My previous post doesn't mean all compilers have same speed, and all interpreters have same speed.
delphi and c++ using compilers doesn't mean they are same in performace, performace of a computer language will depend on the coding and how far the specific compiler is optimised for the task. Taking for example the C++ compilers Visual C++ and gcc (g++) will compile C++ code but you will find somewhat different performance.

ane manda oyma kiyanawa

language used will be a factor only if it's not a compiled language but an interpreted language

My previous post doesn't mean all compilers have same speed, and all interpreters have same speed.

matanam me mokawath therenne ne p

Originally Posted by mkranga
That true to WinZip & 7Zip but not RAR.

Delphi can’t go faster than C/C++. (if coder wasn’t no1 matta. )

In my opinion the language used will be a factor only if it's not a compiled language but an interpreted language. eg: java

It's the compression algorithm which is more important in deciding the compression and performance.

ek eke anithewunta penne nadda me joke pot eka.

 

[coolioWiZ]

Konde badapu chinnunta hodai. don't forget we r in 2007.

Developing algorithms for data compression and encryption is a cutting edge task, serious business. Data compression and encryption algorithms are more important today and for the future where information will be the most valued and most dynamic factor which will drive our world.

ane manda oyma kiyanawa

matanam me mokawath therenne ne p

Some compiler benchmarks. Not all compliers are same in performance. I never said all compilers have the "same" performance regardless of system, language, hardware
http://www.willus.com/ccomp_benchmark.shtml?p1
http://www.realworldtech.com/page.cfm?AID=RWT071302231228
http://www.open-mag.com/features/Vol_15/IntelC/intelc.htm


Also check this page, it compares mainly python (intepreted) but you will see a nice table with a whole mix of compilers and intepreters in it.
http://bitboost.com/people/intro-to...n--2002-11--special-topic--runspeed--002.html
You will see that intepreters (ruby phyton java) are in the bottom of the table related to compilers (c c++)

ek eke anithewunta penne nadda me joke pot eka.

jackpot?