so is it safe to say Buddhism does not elaborate on why things change since its not a primary focus of Buddhism ?well as far as i know....reason for change is the nature of human and all other living and other things which are not alive....we cant exactly show what and why is the changing for....as we cant define it without reasoning all acts happns in a time line and in a mind...main reason for the change in human nature is the feelings and thoughts which dosent have a meaning of the same at two moments...there are some things which explains the behaviour...in buddhism atalodahama is one thing which explains the nature of changing,,,,and for the second level it is niyama dharma,,,,change in the time line coused by these...changing the whole idea which buddhism is telling us to understand with our insight,,,its just a cycle as long as ya in it you will always feel the change...
btw...this is the rough idea i have in ma mind....if some have any statics n sources feel free to share..and correct me if am wrong,,,,!!
sachii akke..mata victor rathnayakege"budu hamuduruwo apith dakinnethi" sinduwa dennako...
so is it safe to say Buddhism does not elaborate on why things change since its not a primary focus of Buddhism ?
Do explain that one. Using any language that you feel comfortable in.nah you cant say that....but still it is not game of words...btw buddhism explains the reason to the term CHANGE in The Four Noble Truths...as the reason for all this facts...as the primodial state....which we may say the radical view
මට දෙන්න පුලුවන්ද
දැයම පුබුදුවාලු නිමලපහන නිවුනා ගීතය දෙන්න
definitely true.ගතිගුණ අතින් අපි තවමත් වනන්තරේ ... true / false
definitely true.
The religion bashing threads in EK alone proves that.



definitely true.
The religion bashing threads in EK alone proves that.
that shows nothing but the lack of knowledge in there own religion