kelauna widiya

Thinkerz

Member
Mar 14, 2019
428
32
0
අරම කිව්වෙ බුද්ධාගමේ මිථ්‍යා දෘශ්ඨිකයො කෙලිංම අපායෙ යනව කියල තියෙනව කියල කිව්ව ? :shocked:




රා අරක්කු බොන එක නවත්තල තියෙනව එක ආත්මෙක වෙරි වෙලා බයිට් නැතිවුනාම කේන්ති ගිහිල්ල තමන්ගෙම ලමයව මරාගෙන කෑවට පස්සෙ. වෙරි හිඳුනාම තේරිලා කරපු දේ එදා ඉඳන් බිව්වෙ නෑ කියලයි අහල තියෙන්නෙ නං.

උන අඩියක් ගහල ඉදපන්. ඔව්ව හිතන්න එපා
 

Pessimist

Well-known member
  • Mar 6, 2018
    20,665
    1,562
    113
    🌎
    ඕක වෙලා කල්ප කොටි ගානක් යන්න ඇති බුදු වෙන්න නේද ?

    ඒක නං කොහොමද දන්නෑ. කෝටි ගානක්ම පෙරුම් පුරන්නත් වෙලා තියෙනවනෙ.
     

    Emios

    Well-known member
  • Dec 10, 2009
    73,831
    66,371
    113
    හරි බං අපායේ නොගියට සෝවාන් වෙන්න බෑනේ.
    සෝවාන් නොවුනොත් මොනා කරත් වැඩක් නෑනේ..
    ජේසු කිව්වේ හොඳට කාල බිල හැමෝටම ලවු කරගෙන උදව් කරගෙන මයිත්‍රී කරගෙන ඉන්න කියල... ඕව කරා කියල සෝවාන් වෙන්න නෑනේ..





    ඔව් බන්...:baffled:

    ඕක වෙලා කල්ප කොටි ගානක් යන්න ඇති බුදු වෙන්න නේද ?

    Not just budhu to be samma sabuddha.Almost anyone can become budhu but not samma sambudhu
     

    Pessimist

    Well-known member
  • Mar 6, 2018
    20,665
    1,562
    113
    🌎
    උන අඩියක් ගහල ඉදපන්. ඔව්ව හිතන්න එපා


    i don't drink :no: i wont drink :no:
    as for the thinking:

    image.png
     

    Pessimist

    Well-known member
  • Mar 6, 2018
    20,665
    1,562
    113
    🌎
    උබ ගහපු ජෝයින්ටෙක මොකක්ද? අපිටත් සෙට් කරහං බඩු තියෙනවා නං. සුපිරි වගේ

    it's called thinking :( be warned. it's extremely addictive.

    the only philosophy quote that i can keep in mind... :rofl:

    :baffled:
    what about you can't get into the same river twice ? to be is to be perceived ? perhaps you might find the second one interesting :yes: there's god in it :yes:
     
    Last edited:

    KasunKDP

    Well-known member
  • Oct 29, 2013
    35,872
    1,652
    113
    hell
    it's called thinking :( be warned. it's extremely addictive.



    :baffled:
    what about you can't get into the same river twice ? to be is to be perceived ? perhaps you might the second one interesting :yes: there's god in it :yes:

    :yes:

    we exist cuz god is watching us...
     

    Emios

    Well-known member
  • Dec 10, 2009
    73,831
    66,371
    113
    so become sowan must a alot easier...?

    Very easy if you work toward it.remove these 3 and you are sowan

    The three fetters which the sotāpanna eradicates are:[24][25]

    Self-view — The view of substance, or that what is compounded (sankhata) could be eternal in the five aggregates (form, feelings, perception, intentions, cognizance), and thus possessed or owned as 'I', 'me', or 'mine'. A sotāpanna doesn't actually have a view about self (sakkāya-ditthi), as that doctrine is proclaimed to be a subtle form of clinging.[26]

    Clinging to rites and rituals - Eradication of the view that one becomes pure simply through performing rituals (animal sacrifices, ablutions, chanting, etc.) or adhering to rigid moralism or relying on a god for non-causal delivery (issara nimmāna). Rites and rituals now function more to obscure, than to support the right view of the sotāpanna's now opened dharma eye. The sotāpanna realizes that deliverance can be won only through the practice of the Noble Eightfold Path. It is the elimination of the notion that there are shortcuts to perfecting all virtues.

    Skeptical doubt - Doubt about the Buddha, his teaching (Dharma), and his community (Sangha) is eradicated because the sotāpanna personally experiences the true nature of reality through insight, and this insight confirms the accuracy of the Buddha’s teaching. Seeing removes doubt, because the sight is a form of vision (dassana), that allows one to know (ñāṇa).
     

    KasunKDP

    Well-known member
  • Oct 29, 2013
    35,872
    1,652
    113
    hell
    Very easy if you work toward it.remove these 3 and you are sowan

    The three fetters which the sotāpanna eradicates are:[24][25]

    Self-view — The view of substance, or that what is compounded (sankhata) could be eternal in the five aggregates (form, feelings, perception, intentions, cognizance), and thus possessed or owned as 'I', 'me', or 'mine'. A sotāpanna doesn't actually have a view about self (sakkāya-ditthi), as that doctrine is proclaimed to be a subtle form of clinging.[26]

    Clinging to rites and rituals - Eradication of the view that one becomes pure simply through performing rituals (animal sacrifices, ablutions, chanting, etc.) or adhering to rigid moralism or relying on a god for non-causal delivery (issara nimmāna). Rites and rituals now function more to obscure, than to support the right view of the sotāpanna's now opened dharma eye. The sotāpanna realizes that deliverance can be won only through the practice of the Noble Eightfold Path. It is the elimination of the notion that there are shortcuts to perfecting all virtues.

    Skeptical doubt - Doubt about the Buddha, his teaching (Dharma), and his community (Sangha) is eradicated because the sotāpanna personally experiences the true nature of reality through insight, and this insight confirms the accuracy of the Buddha’s teaching. Seeing removes doubt, because the sight is a form of vision (dassana), that allows one to know (ñāṇa).

    :rolleyes:

    එකම දෙවියන් වහන්සේට පමණක් වන්දනා කරව!
     

    Pessimist

    Well-known member
  • Mar 6, 2018
    20,665
    1,562
    113
    🌎
    nalins statement is kinda smilier to 'i think therefor i am" ? isnt it?

    :no:
    hell no. it's nowhere near that :no:
    Nalin's view is even the very concept "thinking" is because I think. It's circular without a foundation to begin with. I think that I think because I think. Besides he the rejects the existence of me. according to Descartes I already exists. And he inferred the existence of self starting from something more fundamental. For Nalin it's the exact opposite. Even logical inferences are mere thoughts. I don't exist. My thoughts don't exist. Nothing exists. It's just that my mind thinks they exist. And my mind is because my mind thinks my mind exists. Circular thinking.
     

    KasunKDP

    Well-known member
  • Oct 29, 2013
    35,872
    1,652
    113
    hell
    :no:
    hell no. it's nowhere near that :no:
    Nalin's view is even the very concept "thinking" is because I think. It's circular without a foundation to begin with. I think that I think because I think. Besides he the rejects the existence of me. according to Descartes I already exists. And he inferred the existence of self starting from something more fundamental. For Nalin it's the exact opposite. Even logical inferences are mere thoughts. I don't exist. My thoughts don't exist. Nothing exists. It's just that my mind thinks they exist. And my mind is because my mind thinks my mind exists. Circular thinking.

    since circular thinking dosent exist in western philosophy dont u think its the western expression of the same idea,?