POLYGAMY IN ISLAM

[nadeeshaF]

ISLAM IS NOT A MAN-MADE LAW THESE ARE DIVINE LAWS YOU CAN ONLY TRY TO PROVE THIS IS WRONG BUT YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO PROVE IT WRONG...... SO PLEASE KEEP TRY TO PROVE IT WRONG BEST OF LUCK

I have already proven it wrong on the basis that there are more younger men than women.

Also Islam was a man-made law, a man who lived in the 5th century, who killed and looted innocent civilians.

 

[booleanB]

I have already proven it wrong on the basis that there are more younger men than women.

Also Islam was a man-made law, a man who lived in the 5th century, who killed and looted innocent civilians.

OMG is that true

 

[nadeeshaF]

OMG is that true

Yes, yes and yes

 

[Wal Bada]

YOU CAN CHECK BELOW SOME MUSLIM MAJORITY COUNTRY MALE:FEMALE RATIO FROM YOUR SOURCE
M:F > LESS THAN 100 MEANS THERE ARE LESS MALES.
ALBANIA 99
AZERBAIJAN 95
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 95
ETHIOPIA 99
KAZAKHSTAN 92
KYRGYZSTAN 97
LEBANON 96
MOROCCO 97
SENEGAL 99
TURKMENISTAN 97
UZBEKISTAN 99

And easily I can say that these countries will affect less than 25% of the Muslim population. Stop kidding. In muslim countries there are excess males. Indonesia, Bangladesh and Malaysia and India have half of the muslims in the world.

Once again you are an epic fail. Because your Men < Women countries are piss poor in population compared to ones I have given

 

[Eranda200]

Another shit stirring thread by saharaz.

Muslims will find a billion excuses to defend the wrong promoted in the name of their religion. Don't talk about polygamy that happened centuries back in other cultures to defend your own wrong. The point is, civilised people no longer practice it. Only a backward religion like Islam will promote such stupid ideologies.

I think it must be more traumatic for children when their fathers have multiple wives, resulting in a hoard of half siblings. Knowing that your father goes and sticks it in a different woman each night must be a sickening thought.

sis i totally i agree... i jst dont knw why peopl dnt use a bit f common sense rather dan following centuries f traditions n customs. i think itz bcoz religion is hard-wired to every single muslim on the planet. they dont knw any better. science is prohibited 2 question their lives... i dont understnd why..

plus hw muslim women tolerate this act is even more disgusting.

i mean no offense 2 any f my muslim bro or sis.

 

[Wal Bada]

We'll add the populations of following Muslim majority

Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Iraq, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Lebanon, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya
Madagascar, Malaysia, Maldives, Morocco, Nigeria, Northern Mariana Islands, Occupied Palestinian Territory, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar
Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Syrian Arab Republic, Tunisia, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, Yemen

Males - 691m, females - 675m M:F ration 102.4

Once again, Epic Fail

 

[sarahgal18]

yea that true..this argument is unneccsary....i mean totally ..coz its the mistake of Shaharaz puttin this post here!!!! coz its dumb to put a religous post on a country where the native religon is not followed properly anymore!!!!!! im not bein pathetic
the tamils dnt follow there religon !! the buddhist even the muslims..
so its dumb n we ppl arguing ... dnt hate other religons n be racist !!! n furhter dnt be lesbians !!!!

 

[saharaz]

I quoted the population statistics for 2007. Do you have any proof of dissimilarity for that year? If not, those figures are correct by default- If anyone should keep a tab of the population growth patterns in the US, it would be their own statistics bureau. If you diagree with me, Can you tell me a better source? I am not concerned about 2006 statistics btw.

LOL, You have some ball to call the US statistics beurea "rubbish", all the while quoting zakir naik's unsubstantiated figures pulled straight out of his arse.

I'M DISAGREE WITH YOU BCOZ YOUR DATAS ARE CONTRADICTS. SECONDLY I DON'T CARE WHETHER YOU CONCERNED ABOUT 2006 STATS ... BUT I CONCERNED ABOUT ALL THE STATS......SO NO POINT OF ARGUEING BASED ON YOU DATAS SO TRY TO LOOK FOR SOME OTHER EXCUSE .........

 

[saharaz]

I have already proven it wrong on the basis that there are more younger men than women.

Also Islam was a man-made law, a man who lived in the 5th century, who killed and looted innocent civilians.

THAT'S HOW YOUR PEOPLE AND YOUR MEDIAS PORTRAIT ISLAM AND 5th CENTURY MAN. JUST SPARE SOMETIME TO KNOW THE TRUTH ABOUT THIS 5th CENTURY MAN... IF YOU CAN JUST CLICK THE LINK TO KNOW ABOUT THAT 5th CENTURY MAN
.
http://www.elakiri.com/forum/showthread.php?t=106859

 

[saharaz]

OMG is that true

I HOPE YOU HAVE YOUR OWN MIND IF IT SO YOU CAN JUST CLICK THE LINK TO KNOW ABOUT THAT 5th CENTURY MAN

http://www.elakiri.com/forum/showthread.php?t=106859

 

[saharaz]

sis i totally i agree... i jst dont knw why peopl dnt use a bit f common sense rather dan following centuries f traditions n customs. i think itz bcoz religion is hard-wired to every single muslim on the planet. they dont knw any better. science is prohibited 2 question their lives... i dont understnd why..

plus hw muslim women tolerate this act is even more disgusting.

i mean no offense 2 any f my muslim bro or sis.

NO PERSONAL NO HARD FEELINGS ….. OPEN PLACE TO OPEN DISCUSSION GOT IT ???? KIDZ AND FELLOWZ AFRAID OF TRUTH KEEP AWAY …. I HOPE YOU GOT IT

SECOND THING IS

science is prohibited 2 question their lives...

BULLSHIT !!!!!! MUSLIMS ARE THE PIONEERS OF MODERN SCIENCE ...... YOU UNDERSTAND

 

[saharaz]

yea that true..this argument is unneccsary....i mean totally ..coz its the mistake of Shaharaz puttin this post here!!!! coz its dumb to put a religous post on a country where the native religon is not followed properly anymore!!!!!! im not bein pathetic
the tamils dnt follow there religon !! the buddhist even the muslims..
so its dumb n we ppl arguing ... dnt hate other religons n be racist !!! n furhter dnt be lesbians !!!!

OPEN PLACE TO OPEN DISCUSSION GOT IT ???? KIDZ AND FELLOWZ AFRAID OF TRUTH KEEP AWAY …. IF YOU HAVE NOTHING TO POST SENSIBLY PLEASE SHUT UP.... I HOPE YOU GOT IT

MAY BE HINDUS AND BUDDHIST ARE NOT FOLLOWING THIER RELIGION BUT MUSLIMS ARE FOLLOWING THERE RELIGION IF YOU WANT EXAMPLE ASK ME I WILL GIVE YOU .......

SECOND THING IS I WONDER WHY YOU DIDIN'T INCLUDE CHRISTIANITY IN THE LIST OF YOUR RELIGIONS MAY BE YOU ARE A CHRISTIAN OR YOU FORGET IT ?????

THIRDLY I AGREE WITH ONE THING DON'T BE LESBIANS...... TNX

 

[saharaz]

And easily I can say that these countries will affect less than 25% of the Muslim population. Stop kidding. In muslim countries there are excess males. Indonesia, Bangladesh and Malaysia and India have half of the muslims in the world.

Once again you are an epic fail. Because your Men < Women countries are piss poor in population compared to ones I have given

IN MANY THREADS EK MEMBERS SAYS THAT WAL BADA IS A MOODAYA .... BUT I DIDN'T ACCEPT IN SPITE OF THAT I WAS ARGUING WITH YOU BUT NOW SORRY BAN NO POINT OF ARGUEING WITH A MOODA IDEAS

AGAIN I'M TELLING YOU WALBADA STOP KIDDING AROUND HERE ….. DON’T CONSIDER EK MEMBERS ARE FOOL …

TOPIC IS POLYGAMY IN ISLAM , SECONDLY POLYGYNY IS NOT A RULE BUT AN EXCEPTION IN ISLAM. MANY PEOPLE ARE UNDER THE MISCONCEPTION THAT IT IS COMPULSORY FOR A MUSLIM MAN TO HAVE MORE THAN ONE WIFE.

WALBADOOO ……… US AND EUROPEAN SEX STATICS ARE ONLY ON EXAMPLE AMONG 4 WHICH I HAVE GIVEN SO

TRY NOT TO DIVERT THE SUBJECT TO ISLAMIC COUNTRIES, MALE:FEMALE RATIO AND NON ISLAMIC COUNTRY MALE:FEMALE RATIO AND DO NOT MAKE THIS PLACE A CONFUSION LIKE YOUR MIND ………….

 

[nadeeshaF]

>.< watchout saharaz has gone apeshit again

I'M DISAGREE WITH YOU BCOZ YOUR DATAS ARE CONTRADICTS. SECONDLY I DON'T CARE WHETHER YOU CONCERNED ABOUT 2006 STATS ... BUT I CONCERNED ABOUT ALL THE STATS......SO NO POINT OF ARGUEING BASED ON YOU DATAS SO TRY TO LOOK FOR SOME OTHER EXCUSE .........

I was hoping you'd pull out this one again, because I dug around that link you provided yesterday and caught something you missed, which I am about to share with you.

Now I hate to burst your bubble, but your claim about the US bureau of statistics being unreliable due to inconsistent figures is WRONG. Here's why:

- As you said, these are estimated time series data (if you want concensus statistics you can refer to the base year 2000, when the last concensus took place, and you will see that the young male population is still greater than the young female population).

- Time series data is subject to change, and the bureau does so once a year in July. During which time, the population time series is revised, including figures of past years to arrive at a more accurate estimate for the present year. You can read about it here>>>http://www.census.gov/popest/topics/methodology/2007-nat-meth.html

- "These postcensal estimates from April 1, 2000 through July 1, 2007 supersede all previous estimates produced since Census 2000" states the statistics bureau.


- Therefore the statistics bureau is NOT posting erroneous data as you stated, but revising figures for the entire population time series starting from 2000, to include the present year. This is why the data on my link didn't tally with yours'. The table you provided was the 2006 adjustments, and outdated as acknowledged on the website.


- All this only attests the fact that, as mentioned ealier, the most accurate as of date is the most recent set of data, which is from July 2007. This is the set I took my figures from.

So once again you FAIL

You fail for being delusional enough to think that a US government website would be dumb enough to make such errors. Seriously, what are you smoking?

You fail, because the data I presented to you is not wrong as you implied, and continue to be proof of there being more younger men than women. Even if you don't want to consider estimated data you can refer the concensus statistics from 2000, and you'll still see there were more young men than women.

You fail, because you conveniently ignore wal bada's figures that indicate there are more men than women in most countries, and in this world. This alone refutes your entire argument on polygamy.

 

[nadeeshaF]

BULLSHIT !!!!!! MUSLIMS ARE THE PIONEERS OF MODERN SCIENCE ...... YOU UNDERSTAND

Mwahahahahahahaha

And you call wal bada the modaya? This is the most idiotic statement yet on this thread, and it came right outta your stinky piehole.

 

[nadeeshaF]

THAT'S HOW YOUR PEOPLE AND YOUR MEDIAS PORTRAIT ISLAM AND 5th CENTURY MAN. JUST SPARE SOMETIME TO KNOW THE TRUTH ABOUT THIS 5th CENTURY MAN... IF YOU CAN JUST CLICK THE LINK TO KNOW ABOUT THAT 5th CENTURY MAN
.
http://www.elakiri.com/forum/showthread.php?t=106859

For the real scoop on this 5th century desert goon have a look at this very enlightening article by Ali Sina: >>>>http://www.faithfreedom.org/Articles/sinaprologue.htm

 

[saharaz]

Mwahahahahahahaha

And you call wal bada the modaya? This is the most idiotic statement yet on this thread, and it came right outta your stinky piehole.

CUT THE CRAP AND CHECK THE LINKS....​

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_science
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_science_in_the_Middle_Ages
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Muslim_scientists
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_science_and_technology_in_the_Islamic_world

 

[Wal Bada]

N MANY THREADS EK MEMBERS SAYS THAT WAL BADA IS A MOODAYA .... BUT I DIDN'T ACCEPT IN SPITE OF THAT I WAS ARGUING WITH YOU BUT NOW SORRY BAN NO POINT OF ARGUEING WITH A MOODA IDEAS

AGAIN I'M TELLING YOU WALBADA STOP KIDDING AROUND HERE ….. DON’T CONSIDER EK MEMBERS ARE FOOL …

If you cannot argue, just piss off. The insults that are hailed at me shows your 3rd class nature, because when you are short of material you tend to target the poster.

Once again, features of an epic fail.

 

[Wal Bada]

TOPIC IS POLYGAMY IN ISLAM , SECONDLY POLYGYNY IS NOT A RULE BUT AN EXCEPTION IN ISLAM. MANY PEOPLE ARE UNDER THE MISCONCEPTION THAT IT IS COMPULSORY FOR A MUSLIM MAN TO HAVE MORE THAN ONE WIFE.

Or is it a luxury? Who said it was compulsory? Our problem is about it even being an exception. Because we belive it's an uncivilized behavior in modern world. Do you get the argeument, or are you a tree?

 

[Wal Bada]

WALBADOOO ……… US AND EUROPEAN SEX STATICS ARE ONLY ON EXAMPLE AMONG 4 WHICH I HAVE GIVEN SO

You are free to elaborate with stats, but I am not premitted to. Eh? Excuse me?