first of all let me thank the all three judges who gave me their verdicts.You may dont know the judges yet.so let me introduce them.
here is the debate thread
http://www.elakiri.com/forum/showthread.php?t=93906
Jayanthah
sri_lion
nash_node
these people gave their verdict middle of their busy life.so let me put their results and the explanations........
Jayanthah's verdict
Hi Guys,
Following is my verdict of the debate;
A1-Kalindu Gayan
Appoach was very good, not formal, in the end he didnt really get to the point he was trying to say, no example etc, many typing mistakes
Points 7/10
B1-Dilrasan
Very good clear cut approach, good example about war & poverty, counter attack Kalindu gayan'[s point nicely
Points 9/10
A2-Raji
Very good approach, good verbal skills (vocublury), counter attcks Dilrasan's point well, nice closing with precise message
Points 10/10
B2 - Cj4ever
Good start, counter attcked Raji's point well, but the presentation of facts are off topic
Points 6/10
A3 -Gihan(was he there in the original team??)
Good approach & good examples, capitalized on Cj4ever'[s mistake, facts are bit all over the place
Point 9/10
B3-Asitha
Very good start & approch, Good point in attcking Gihan's point, again gone slightly off topic by saying Prabkaran the movie is not a great work of art (Subjective matters)
Points 9/10
Team A points 26
Team B Points 24
Nash_node's verdict
Let's see...
My judgment.
KalinduGayan - B1
Start was good.. (i mean the salutation) ..
... but after than he totally missed his entire point. He tried to say something..but didn't really get there. Lacked the skill to lay a strong foundation for his team to carry on after him.
6/10
Dilrasan - A1
He played into the hands of the opponents, but sadly (for the other team) and Luckily (for him) no one capitalized on his blunders. If I was the next debater, I would call him my "my friend"
5/10
rajigplk - B2
Nice, quick to the point and gave some SOLID stuff for the other team to break. A good effort.
8/10
CJ4ever - A2
A small talk. ... tried to show something..but really didnt stand up to what he wanted to point out. He could have done a better job.
6/10
dwghihanw - B3
Considering to his predecessors... EXCELLENT job done. Good examples and definetly had a fighting spirit. Brought solid points for his side and made a good foundation for his case. Bravo !!
9/10
Asitha-k - A3
Not really solid.. but good effort...and Definitely not a good Closing compared to his opponent.
7/10.
so the Marks are
A Team - 18
(Dilrasan, CJ4ever, Asith-k)
B Team - 23
(KalinduGayan,rajigplk, dwghihandw)
sri_lion's verdict
Verdict: assessed by sri_lion
Note:
The marking is given considering many factors, 10 points were allocated for each reply and the
breakdown of the 10 as follows, First, the number of words per reply checked as it has to be below 250
limit. 2 points allocated for every reply that adhered to the limit and minus 2 for replies which fails to do
so.
Secondly, the quality of points bought on by the particular member to the debate in his reply has been
looked at, and the ability to successfully and logically answer a question from the opposition has been
also looked at. This results in total of 8 points for both efforts of bringing on good logical points and
answering opposition points successfully and logically plus other factors such as handling the language
in a proper and formal manner also being looked at.
Kalindugayan
- Word Limit : 2 Points
- Overall Logicality: 4 Points
- Total : 6/10
Note:
Wasn’t really sure of what approach he should take, could have been more organized in his
approach, his conclusion wasn’t really backed by proper foundation of logics
dilrasan
- Word Limit: 2 Points
- Overall Logicality: 5 Points
- Total: 7/10
Note:
Good Effort, Quick to point out a local example, the final point about technology is bit confusing as
he did not take much effort to elaborate more on that
rajigplk
- Word Limit: 2 Points
- Overall Logicality: 7 Points
- Total: 9/10
Note:
Very good effort, straight to the point and entered the discussion through an oppositions point (nice
move!), good use of language, Charlie Chaplin’s example was good!
cj4ever
- Word Limit: 2 Points
- Overall Logicality: 6 Points
- Total: 8/10
Note:
Quite successfully answered the opposition, but his own point could have been a bit more refined,
like for example even though “Love” is still a topic for many arts you cannot completely ignore the
effect of the outer world on it.. Maybe he could have more specific to further prove his point on
cases where “Love” was the only factor involved!
dwghihanw
- Word Limit: 0 Points (exceeded)
- Overall Logicality: 5 Points
- Total: 5/10
Note:
Word Limit exceeded and lost 2 points, good example on Tibet. S. Mainda himi, answering
opposition’s points was successful to a certain extent
Asitha-K
- Word Limit: 2 Points
- Overall Logicality: 5 Points
- Total: 7/10
Note:
Totally misjudged the word “samakaleena”, Gemany example actually refers to that era and Charlie
Chaplin doing his work in that particular era.. so in that sense it is “samakaleena” to that era itself.
Good point on film Prabakaran, answering “Tupac” example not quite comprehensive.. even if he is
the only one rapper, that itself is enough to prove the point that “his surrounding’s had some effect
on his work”, we are not talking about numbers here!
Team A Total Points Team B Total Points
dilrasan 7/10 Kalindugayan 6/10
cj4ever 8/10 rajigplk 9/10
Asitha-K 7/10 dwghihanw 5/10
Grand Total 22/30 Grand Total 20/30
so this is the way they gave their marks.....
so with a simple calculation we can determine the winner.......
TEAM A FINAL POINTS=66
TEAM B FINAL POINTS=67
so as u can see team B wins the debate by one point.but nevertheless it was a close one...so if u have any problems with these marks ask any question.the judges will answer u r questions.
and finally let me thank all the people who help me to do this mega event with high colours..we did something extraordinary.I hope that someone will carry out this work in the next year also..
thank u all..............
here is the debate thread
http://www.elakiri.com/forum/showthread.php?t=93906
Jayanthah
sri_lion
nash_node
these people gave their verdict middle of their busy life.so let me put their results and the explanations........
Jayanthah's verdict
Hi Guys,
Following is my verdict of the debate;
A1-Kalindu Gayan
Appoach was very good, not formal, in the end he didnt really get to the point he was trying to say, no example etc, many typing mistakes
Points 7/10
B1-Dilrasan
Very good clear cut approach, good example about war & poverty, counter attack Kalindu gayan'[s point nicely
Points 9/10
A2-Raji
Very good approach, good verbal skills (vocublury), counter attcks Dilrasan's point well, nice closing with precise message
Points 10/10
B2 - Cj4ever
Good start, counter attcked Raji's point well, but the presentation of facts are off topic
Points 6/10
A3 -Gihan(was he there in the original team??)
Good approach & good examples, capitalized on Cj4ever'[s mistake, facts are bit all over the place
Point 9/10
B3-Asitha
Very good start & approch, Good point in attcking Gihan's point, again gone slightly off topic by saying Prabkaran the movie is not a great work of art (Subjective matters)
Points 9/10
Team A points 26
Team B Points 24
Nash_node's verdict
Let's see...
My judgment.
KalinduGayan - B1
Start was good.. (i mean the salutation) ..
... but after than he totally missed his entire point. He tried to say something..but didn't really get there. Lacked the skill to lay a strong foundation for his team to carry on after him.6/10
Dilrasan - A1
He played into the hands of the opponents, but sadly (for the other team) and Luckily (for him) no one capitalized on his blunders. If I was the next debater, I would call him my "my friend"
5/10
rajigplk - B2
Nice, quick to the point and gave some SOLID stuff for the other team to break. A good effort.
8/10
CJ4ever - A2
A small talk.
... tried to show something..but really didnt stand up to what he wanted to point out. He could have done a better job.6/10
dwghihanw - B3
Considering to his predecessors... EXCELLENT job done. Good examples and definetly had a fighting spirit. Brought solid points for his side and made a good foundation for his case. Bravo !!
9/10
Asitha-k - A3
Not really solid.. but good effort...and Definitely not a good Closing compared to his opponent.
7/10.
so the Marks are
A Team - 18
(Dilrasan, CJ4ever, Asith-k)
B Team - 23
(KalinduGayan,rajigplk, dwghihandw)
sri_lion's verdict
Verdict: assessed by sri_lion
Note:
The marking is given considering many factors, 10 points were allocated for each reply and the
breakdown of the 10 as follows, First, the number of words per reply checked as it has to be below 250
limit. 2 points allocated for every reply that adhered to the limit and minus 2 for replies which fails to do
so.
Secondly, the quality of points bought on by the particular member to the debate in his reply has been
looked at, and the ability to successfully and logically answer a question from the opposition has been
also looked at. This results in total of 8 points for both efforts of bringing on good logical points and
answering opposition points successfully and logically plus other factors such as handling the language
in a proper and formal manner also being looked at.
Kalindugayan
- Word Limit : 2 Points
- Overall Logicality: 4 Points
- Total : 6/10
Note:
Wasn’t really sure of what approach he should take, could have been more organized in his
approach, his conclusion wasn’t really backed by proper foundation of logics
dilrasan
- Word Limit: 2 Points
- Overall Logicality: 5 Points
- Total: 7/10
Note:
Good Effort, Quick to point out a local example, the final point about technology is bit confusing as
he did not take much effort to elaborate more on that
rajigplk
- Word Limit: 2 Points
- Overall Logicality: 7 Points
- Total: 9/10
Note:
Very good effort, straight to the point and entered the discussion through an oppositions point (nice
move!), good use of language, Charlie Chaplin’s example was good!
cj4ever
- Word Limit: 2 Points
- Overall Logicality: 6 Points
- Total: 8/10
Note:
Quite successfully answered the opposition, but his own point could have been a bit more refined,
like for example even though “Love” is still a topic for many arts you cannot completely ignore the
effect of the outer world on it.. Maybe he could have more specific to further prove his point on
cases where “Love” was the only factor involved!
dwghihanw
- Word Limit: 0 Points (exceeded)
- Overall Logicality: 5 Points
- Total: 5/10
Note:
Word Limit exceeded and lost 2 points, good example on Tibet. S. Mainda himi, answering
opposition’s points was successful to a certain extent
Asitha-K
- Word Limit: 2 Points
- Overall Logicality: 5 Points
- Total: 7/10
Note:
Totally misjudged the word “samakaleena”, Gemany example actually refers to that era and Charlie
Chaplin doing his work in that particular era.. so in that sense it is “samakaleena” to that era itself.
Good point on film Prabakaran, answering “Tupac” example not quite comprehensive.. even if he is
the only one rapper, that itself is enough to prove the point that “his surrounding’s had some effect
on his work”, we are not talking about numbers here!
Team A Total Points Team B Total Points
dilrasan 7/10 Kalindugayan 6/10
cj4ever 8/10 rajigplk 9/10
Asitha-K 7/10 dwghihanw 5/10
Grand Total 22/30 Grand Total 20/30
so this is the way they gave their marks.....
so with a simple calculation we can determine the winner.......
TEAM A FINAL POINTS=66
TEAM B FINAL POINTS=67
so as u can see team B wins the debate by one point.but nevertheless it was a close one...so if u have any problems with these marks ask any question.the judges will answer u r questions.
and finally let me thank all the people who help me to do this mega event with high colours..we did something extraordinary.I hope that someone will carry out this work in the next year also..
thank u all..............
Last edited:
winner!
)
