Lich said:Its all depends on the track
if the Singer goes to a composer and made the track and paid that person composer cant influence anything and singer owns it. but composer can tell or suggest anything. and same as that to lyrics writers too. if singer paying them. they just doing a job. they cant get the rights. but for some extent they can say it done by them. and singer should mention their names.
but still morally song can not be catergorized as a economic godd rite???Lich said:Its all depends on the track
if the Singer goes to a composer and made the track and paid that person composer cant influence anything and singer owns it. but composer can tell or suggest anything. and same as that to lyrics writers too. if singer paying them. they just doing a job. they cant get the rights. but for some extent they can say it done by them. and singer should mention their names.
listners have the right 2 demand for the quality producs, but I dn't think they have any legal right over the song!!!ravicplk said:but what u think about the listeners..
there should be a flock of listeners in order to hear the song. so they are doing it for them. so ..........
yes i agreerash87 said:listners have the right 2 demand for the quality producs, but I dn't think they have any legal right over the song!!!
its like this macho...ravicplk said:but what u think about the listeners..
there should be a flock of listeners in order to hear the song. so they are doing it for them. so ..........
tht's wht I was tlkng abt!!!ravicplk said:yes i agree
but the most important thing is the taste given to the listeners.
no ehema kiyanna bae.. cant be Equally shared if its paid and took... even the singer paid he or she have to put the lyrics or the music directors name. but then the real owner of the song will be the Singer and the Record label. but other two or three parties just can influence them. but not the same level of the singer and the record labelrash87 said:but still morally song can not be catergorized as a economic godd rite???
Just b-cuz the singer paid the writer that doesn't take his rights out of the song!! Still the song z equally shared by all of the parties who created it!!!
agree with that..legal thing is different prospectiveLich said:its like this macho...
they cant be owners.. owners means they have rights kiyana eka.. so listeners dont have rights.. but they have right what to listen and what not to
thats what i said... listeners have right to listen what they want.... so they have right to choose their likenessrash87 said:listners have the right 2 demand for the quality producs, but I dn't think they have any legal right over the song!!!
machan ill give u a small example..DJAT said:machan lankawe neethiya hatiyata singer composer and writer oya 3 denama sama aithi karayo wenawa.but track 1ka sale kalothe oka nathi wenawa.
Legal action ganna puluwan only to Record Label.. but as far as i know SL is not that standard in Music ... SL is still kids in Music Industry..ravicplk said:agree with that..legal thing is different prospective
this the prevailing situation nin SL, wht I said was the assumtion n the thng wht shud b prevalied!!!Lich said:no ehema kiyanna bae.. cant be Equally shared if its paid and took... even the singer paid he or she have to put the lyrics or the music directors name. but then the real owner of the song will be the Singer and the Record label. but other two or three parties just can influence them. but not the same level of the singer and the record label
if the Artist and the Composer and the writer talk about this issue and talk to the Record label. they can sue those Radio programs and the Channel.... coz those melodies owns by the Composer and the record label ne...ravicplk said:i heard this from radio
"the real owners of a song are Tarzan Bappa, Dasan Mama and Basthiyan mama"
they change the songs like they are owners of them