Sri Lanka's first satellite

[Indika Buddika]

Don’t beat the bush machan.. supremesat claims they provide service to Australia?? My question is to whom in Australia??

It seems you don't know much about regarding aerospace sector. Aerospace companies don't public all their customers because satellites heavily used by military applications and protected data communication of some special users like governments. Even if you look at Company like SpaceX they don't even mention users and the applications of their rocket, that's rockets not even satellites. so satellite companies go extra steps further to keep most of their users private for security reasons and based on user's request and legal agreements.
If it' company as you say, then why do they even send a satellite to space in 2018? simple as that. It's still functional as it was and many major chinese investors already have invested millions of dollars in suremesat.

 

[Indika Buddika]

That’s not the question I asked..

My question is simple.. How many satellites have they launched up to today??

since 2012 they have sent 3 satellites. each have around 15 years of life. so all of their sattelites are still functional.

 

[Panikkiya S-7]

It seems you don't know much about regarding aerospace sector. Aerospace companies don't public all their customers because satellites heavily used by military applications and protected data communication of some special users like governments. Even if you look at Company like SpaceX they don't even mention users and the applications of their rocket, that's rockets not even satellites. so satellite companies go extra steps further to keep most of their users private for security reasons and based on user's request and legal agreements.
If it' company as you say, then why do they even send a satellite to space in 2018? simple as that. It's still functional as it was and many major chinese investors already have invested millions of dollars in suremesat.

So you’re saying a military satellite made in China launched by SriLanka is using Australia for their military services. Ok. Looks like I don’t know a damn thing about aerospace. Sorry.. my bad.

 

[Panikkiya S-7]

since 2012 they have sent 3 satellites. each have around 15 years of life. so all of their sattelites are still functional.

So earlier you said they are not up to their maximum functionality yet. But now you’re saying they provide service to military too.. I need to know as a concern citizen does supremesat have authority to operate in military spectrums?? If they are why Wimal weerawansa so concern about google balloons spying but not supremesat.

 

[Indika Buddika]

So you’re saying a military satellite made in China launched by SriLanka is using Australia for their military services. Ok. Looks like I don’t know a damn thing about aerospace. Sorry.. my bad.

What kind of a logic is that?
so are you saying if any country (Government or military) want to have satellite services they have to built their own rocket, satellites?
Are you serious?
Dude, what you're saying is not happening in real life. even US satellites were sent to space in Chinese and Russian rockets. Their are many Indian Military satellites also developed by countries like france, uk and china and then used chinese & russian rockets to send them to space.
Not only Sri Lanka, if any other 3rd world poor country come up with much better cost reductions for satellite launches and services and provide very confidential legal facilities then any third party (including military) can use satellites from another country. It's all about cost and confidentiality.

 

[Panikkiya S-7]

What kind of a logic is that?
so are you saying if any country (Government or military) want to have satellite services they have to built their own rocket, satellites?
Are you serious?
Dude, what you're saying is not happening in real life. even US satellites were sent to space in Chinese and Russian rockets. Their are many Indian Military satellites also developed by countries like france, uk and china and then used chinese & russian rockets to send them to space.
Not only Sri Lanka, if any other 3rd world poor country come up with much better cost reductions for satellite launches and services and provide very confidential legal facilities then any third party (including military) can use satellites from another country. It's all about cost and confidentiality.

Mate... Trust me SupremeSat is not a Military contractor. Australia is not using them.. Countries use their own satellites and allys satellites to military purposes.
Why do you think Russia has their own glonass?

 

[Indika Buddika]

So earlier you said they are not up to their maximum functionality yet. But now you’re saying they provide service to military too.. I need to know as a concern citizen does supremesat have authority to operate in military spectrums?? If they are why Wimal weerawansa so concern about google balloons spying but not supremesat.

Please show me where I said "They are not up to their maximum capacity yet"
Supremesat is a private company and they can provide their services to military, government or any other party if it doesn't violate the agreement of their users and the government where it operate. Like I told you before even private rocket companies like Spacex, blue origin and arianespace provide their services to many military applications. their is nothing wrong with it if it's not against the law.
Wimal weerawanshe is a blithering idiot, if it's illegal or anything he must take a legal action against google loon project, if someone thinks this supremensat comapny is a scam or stole people's money or against the law of our country, they also must go to courts against supremesat, otherwise that person also no different than Wimal Weerawansa.

 

[Panikkiya S-7]

Please show me where I said "They are not up to their maximum capacity yet"
Supremesat is a private company and they can provide their services to military, government or any other party if it doesn't violate the agreement of their users and the government where it operate. Like I told you before even private rocket companies like Spacex, blue origin and arianespace provide their services to many military applications. their is nothing wrong with it if it's not against the law.
Wimal weerawanshe is a blithering idiot, if it's illegal or anything he must take a legal action against google loon project, if someone thinks this supremensat comapny is a scam or stole people's money or against the law of our country, they also must go to courts against supremesat, otherwise that person also no different than Wimal Weerawansa.

Read the first replies mate.. this is going on circles forever..

 

[Indika Buddika]

Mate... Trust me SupremeSat is not a Military contractor. Australia is not using them.. Countries use their own satellites and allys satellites to military purposes.
Why do you think Russia has their own glonass?

So your saying is russia has their own gpa system, so we should believe that a private company cannot provide military services to another country?
Russia, US, China and now india has their own space programs and aerospaces companies and many of them government owned organization except US, because now US has so many private aerospace companies that could provide services to anyone even military.
So private US companies like Spacex, blue origin, firefly aerospace working with different governments for their military services. their is nothing wrong with that since that's cost effective and confidential.
Australia doesn't have a that kind of their own fully fledged industry in satellite manufacturing and rocket manufacturing, that's why Australian space agency and military heavily rely on third party private contractors for their satellite and rocket services.

 

[Indika Buddika]

Read the first replies mate.. this is going on circles forever..

Could you please quote that reply where I'm saying "They are not up to their maximum capacity yet"?

 

[Panikkiya S-7]

So your saying is russia has their own gpa system, so we should believe that a private company cannot provide military services to another country?
Russia, US, China and now india has their own space programs and aerospaces companies and many of them government owned organization except US, because now US has so many private aerospace companies that could provide services to anyone even military.
So private US companies like Spacex, blue origin, firefly aerospace working with different governments for their military services. their is nothing wrong with that since that's cost effective and confidential.
Australia doesn't have a that kind of their own fully fledged industry in satellite manufacturing and rocket manufacturing, that's why Australian space agency and military heavily rely on third party private contractors for their satellite and rocket services.

උබට මම කියන එක තේරෙන්නේ නැහැ. මම කියන්නේ ඔස්ට්‍රේලියාව හරි වෙන රටක් හරි ප්‍රයිවට් කන්ට්‍රක්ටර්ලා මිලිටරි සර්විස් දෙන එක නැහැයි කියලා නෙමෙයි.. සුප්‍රීම්සැට් එක ඔස්ට්‍රේලියාවට මිලිටරි හරි කමර්ෂල් හරි සර්විස් එකක් දෙන්නේ නැහැ කියලා.. මීටත් වඩා මේ ගැන කතා කරන එකෙන් වෙන්නේ බ්ලඩ් ප්‍රේසර් නගිනවා..

 

[Indika Buddika]

උබට මම කියන එක තේරෙන්නේ නැහැ. මම කියන්නේ ඔස්ට්‍රේලියාව හරි වෙන රටක් හරි ප්‍රයිවට් කන්ට්‍රක්ටර්ලා මිලිටරි සර්විස් දෙන එක නැහැයි කියලා නෙමෙයි.. සුප්‍රීම්සැට් එක ඔස්ට්‍රේලියාවට මිලිටරි හරි කමර්ෂල් හරි සර්විස් එකක් දෙන්නේ නැහැ කියලා.. මීටත් වඩා මේ ගැන කතා කරන එකෙන් වෙන්නේ බ්ලඩ් ප්‍රේසර් නගිනවා..

How you're saying that they don't provide their services to Australia?
If Supremesat has legal agreement with their users not to disclose their infomation, how can you say no?

 

[Panikkiya S-7]

How you're saying that they don't provide their services to Australia?
If Supremesat has legal agreement with their users not to disclose their infomation, how can you say no?

May I ask how do you know for sure they have NDA??

 

[Indika Buddika]

May I ask how do you know for sure they have NDA??

If their providing services to military then definitely they have NDA.
But why you're specifically saying Australia is not taking their service?
you can say same about Asia, Middle East as well, Why specifically Australia?

And provide answers as well, without just asking questions for a quaestion

 

[Panikkiya S-7]

If their providing services to military then definitely they have NDA.
But why you're specifically saying Australia is not taking their service?
you can say same about Asia, Middle East as well, Why specifically Australia?

Because 100% sure that is a lie.. Think that I have NDA. So I can’t tell you how I know. But you can investigate this from supremesat side if you’re curious.

 

[maxtalker]

Eka Private Company ekak project ekak, sampuranayenma private company ekakin invest karala karapu deyak, government eke salli walin neme. Balapan site ekatawath gihin aduma tharame. Satellite ekaka watinakamak danne koheda Lotus tower ekatath banina meeharak.
Wyaja samagamak mokada bn ubalage maha ponila, anurala okata wiruddawa adikaraneta noyanne, aduma ehema deshapalanen karapu hora samagamak nam kohomada bn andu peralith ohoma hodata thiyenne. Gon katha kiyanna epa bn. APi nodanna supreme sat kiwwata, uba danna labbak naa. puluwannam evidence ekka dapan oka government eken invest karala karapu project ekak kiyala.

හරි මේ කියන සැට් එකෙන් ලංකාවෙ අපිට මේ වෙන කොට තියන ප්‍රෙයා්ජන මොනාද කියලා කියපං බලන්ඩ. පෘෆ් එක්ක

 

[pavithra_uk]

What kind of a logic is that?
so are you saying if any country (Government or military) want to have satellite services they have to built their own rocket, satellites?
Are you serious?
Dude, what you're saying is not happening in real life. even US satellites were sent to space in Chinese and Russian rockets. Their are many Indian Military satellites also developed by countries like france, uk and china and then used chinese & russian rockets to send them to space.
Not only Sri Lanka, if any other 3rd world poor country come up with much better cost reductions for satellite launches and services and provide very confidential legal facilities then any third party (including military) can use satellites from another country. It's all about cost and confidentiality.

I don't think that US every sent any of their military / defense satellites via russian rockets. they use russian soyus rockets to sent their astronauts and commercial satellites. USA Already sent as much as militory and defence satellite to space earlier. before their shuttles retired.


Their use of soyus not only cost. currently USA have no carrier rockets operational. their shuttles retired.



I think, this Supremesat (rebranded chinasat. which is common french made commercial satellites?? as i remember) sent to space for commercial use for China and they rent us few channels. so that sri lankan company can use it. I don't think, Australia or other such a country will use these sats for their Military use. they have better offers and access to US or European sat providers that more secure. for Ausies, cost isn't much important.
they already have many satellites. the country is big and they need plenty of services like weather forecast etc..

 

[Indika Buddika]

Because 100% sure that is a lie.. Think that I have NDA. So I can’t tell you how I know. But you can investigate this from supremesat side if you curious.

Ok, let's assume what you're saying is true.
Then you can say same thing about other regions as well. like asia and middle east. And lets forget that also for a moment.
If so then why their are launching satellite to the space if they don't provide satellite services and it's just a shell company? why many Chinese millionaire invest millions of money in supremesat for development of their development and launches?

Dude you started from asking their advertisements on tv, from that you brought different different arguments and reason and just jump to another when I don't agree with you and I have evidence or acceptable logic for prove what I said is true. Anyone who reads from first page can identify what is your intention is just to prove that you're right and supremesat is a shell company without solid prove or logic.

still waiting you to quote the reply where i said ""They are not up to their maximum capacity yet"?

 

[Panikkiya S-7]

Ok, let's assume what you're saying is true.
Then you can say same thing about other regions as well. like asia and middle east. And lets forget that also for a moment.
If so then why their are launching satellite to the space if they don't provide satellite services and it's just a shell company? why many Chinese millionaire invest millions of money in supremesat for development of their development and launches?

Dude you started from asking their advertisements on tv, from that you brought different different arguments and reason and just jump to another when I don't agree with you and I have evidence or acceptable logic for prove what I said is true. Anyone who reads from first page can identify what is your intention is just to prove that you're right and supremesat is a shell company without solid prove or logic.

still waiting you to quote the reply where i said ""They are not up to their maximum capacity yet"?

I don’t know any other region but 100% sure Australia isn’t a customer.

Of course you can’t trust my word. But you trust supremesat so ask them.

 

[Indika Buddika]

I don't think that US every sent any of their military / defense satellites via russian rockets. they use russian soyus rockets to sent their astronauts and commercial satellites. USA Already sent as much as militory and defence satellite to space earlier. before their shuttles retired.


Their use of soyus not only cost. currently USA have no carrier rockets operational. their shuttles retired.



I think, this Supremesat (rebranded chinasat. which is common french made commercial satellites?? as i remember) sent to space for commercial use for China and they rent us few channels. so that sri lankan company can use it. I don't think, Australia or other such a country will use these sats for their Military use. they have better offers and access to US or European sat providers that more secure. for Ausies, cost isn't much important.
they already have many satellites. the country is big and they need plenty of services like weather forecast etc..

Machan we can't just say US and China has better sat providers so aussies only get help from them and don't care about money. even though supremesat is sri lankan company it's has many partners in china and europe for satellite manufacturing and launching. So their is no reliability issue.
We can't say Aussies don't think about money, they definitely think about money . If they can get good service from any company for the money the spend, then they definitely get the help of that company.

If Supremesat is just a shell company, why do they keep launching their satellites and why millionairs invest in supremesat for sat development?
and supremesat is privately funded project and government haven't invested any money in this. so there is nothing to worry about supremesat