මට පේන්නෙ දෙකට කැඩෙයි වගෙ
මේ අය කියන්නෙ සන්ධානෙ අපේක්ශකම දුන්න කියලයි එහෙම කිව්වම නිදහස් පක්ෂෙට ගැලවිලා එලියට එන්න පුලුවන්.
මේ අය කියන්නෙ සන්ධානෙ අපේක්ශකම දුන්න කියලයි එහෙම කිව්වම නිදහස් පක්ෂෙට ගැලවිලා එලියට එන්න පුලුවන්.
Latest ads
-
Premium Land with House for Sale- anil1961
- Updated:
-
AWS Certified Solutions Architect-Associate + AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner- Sanjeewani95
- Updated:
-
🚀 එක පැකේජ් එකයි - මාසෙටම Unlimited Internet! 🌐- sayuru bandara
- Updated:
-
🎬 CapCut Pro 1 Month Access! LKR 600- sayuru bandara
- Updated:
-
🚀 Google One AI PRO Plan (Gemini Pro Activation) – 18 Months Access! LKR 2200- sayuru bandara
- Updated:
අන්තිමට_ජනතා_විමුක්ති_පෙරමුණ_හරි
- Thread starter hirashgeff
- Start date
මට පේන්නෙ දෙකට කැඩෙයි වගෙ
මේ අය කියන්නෙ සන්ධානෙ අපේක්ශකම දුන්න කියලයි එහෙම කිව්වම නිදහස් පක්ෂෙට ගැලවිලා එලියට එන්න පුලුවන්.
Kohomath amu cha wela ban nathra wenne..mee deshapalane chatar..kattiyqk jeppo hodqi kiwa.. oya jeppoth etin huppe thqmayi mona hodakda..
උබ දැක්කද ?
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 COLOMBO 000021
SIPDIS
DEPARTMENT FOR SCA/INSB
RELEASABLE TO: UK, CANADA, AUSTRALIA AND SWITZERLAND
E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/10/2020
TAGS: PGOV PREL PREF PHUM PTER EAID MOPS CE
SUBJECT: SRI LANKA - ELECTIONS UPDATE NO. 6
REF: A. COLOMBO 11
¶B. COLOMBO 7
¶C. COLOMBO 2
¶D. 09 COLOMBO 1152
¶E. 09 COLOMBO 1145
¶F. 09 COLOMBO 1139
COLOMBO 00000021 001.8 OF 003
Classified By: CHARGE VALERIE C. FOWLER. REASONS: 1.4 (B, D)
Fonseka's Manifesto
-------------------
¶1. (C) Presidential candidate Sarath Fonseka released his
campaign "manifesto" on January 7, a full-color 22-page
brochure, which contained a strong condemnation of President
Rajapaksa, largely on grounds of corruption and family
patronage. Post contacts have said the manifesto would be
published in all three local languages and widely
distributed. The manifesto talks about "believable change"
and contains promises on economic reform, government reform
and social welfare improvements. As detailed below,
Fonseka's publication is rather thin on explanations of how
he intends to pay for many of the economic and social-welfare
initiatives he promises. There are a number of other
governmental reforms, however, which could be implemented
with little or no financial burden on the government.
Whether or not a victorious President Fonseka would have the
political capital needed to achieve these reforms remains to
be seen and would be dependent on a compliant parliament.
With parliamentary elections due within several months, the
exact shape of any future Fonseka-era parliament is far from
clear at present.
KEY PROMISES
------------
¶2. (C) The Fonseka manifesto promises a number of
governmental reforms, which if carried out would appear to at
least begin addressing many of the major concerns held by the
international community and human rights groups.
Specifically Fonseka promises to (a) abolish the Executive
Presidency, (b) reactivate the 17th amendment to the
constitution, (c) end the culture of "white van"
disappearances and extra-judicial killings, (d) eliminate the
press council and establish an environment of free media, (e)
return all remaining IDPs and double the resettlement
allowance they receive to 100,000 rupees ) about USD$880 )
per family, (f) amend the emergency regulations, and (g) deal
with all war-related detainees by either prosecuting them,
releasing them or placing them in rehabilitation programs.
FONSEKA THE ECONOMIST?
----------------------
¶3. (C) The economic portion of Fonseka's manifesto contains
positive points on corruption and GSP plus, but more populist
positions on salaries, product prices and taxes. Fonseka
promises to appoint a powerful agency to combat fraud and
corruption, create an independent commission to audit public
finances, and pass a new Parliamentary ethics code. Fonseka
also promises to ensure that the European Union would not
revoke their GSP plus trade benefits, but without disclosing
how he would achieve this. Fonseka makes populist appeals by
promising to increase government salaries by 10,000 Rs ($88
USD) per month. Rajapaksa countered with a promise of a
2,500 Rs ($22 USD) raise. Fonseka promises to provide
pensions for agriculture and fishery workers. Fonseka plans
to reduce the fixed prices of certain items and to bring down
the price of food, diesel and kerosene and other essentials
by reducing taxes.
COLOMBO 00000021 002.8 OF 003
COST OF CORRUPTION ) THANKS TO USAID
------------------------------------
¶4. (C) One portion of Fonseka's argument on corruption cites
statistics from a study partially funded by a USAID grant,
entitled "Impact of Corruption on Poverty and Economic
Growth, 2007". The manifesto does not mention the role of
USAID in that study, and it is unknown whether Fonseka
himself is aware of that connection. The report states that
loss to corruption in 2006 amounted to about 9 percent of the
2006 GDP of Sri Lanka.
HOW WILL HE PAY FOR IT?
-----------------------
¶5. (C ) Candidate Fonseka's economic manifesto coincides
with the economic strategy described in reftel C. Fonseka
does not mention any real reforms except on corruption and
transparency. His promises to increase salaries, lower the
cost of living and cut taxes sound good, but he does not
provide any credible plan to accomplish these goals. In such
a heated campaign environment, it is not surprising that
Fonseka's economic manifesto reveals more of his campaign
strategy than an economic program following the election.
WHAT ISSUES WILL DRIVE THE VOTERS?
----------------------------------
¶6. (C) It is unclear how many votes this manifesto will
garner. The language used in it is very professional and
nuanced, and the arguments on corruption appear convincing,
especially when coupled with other documents floating around
Sri Lanka's e-mail network which detail the corrupt financial
dealings of the Rajapaksa family. Post is sending local
staff into the field to get a sense of the political mood
outside of Colombo and will draw from that reporting in
upcoming elections-related cables. So far voters seem
largely interested in economic matters and care much less
about security-related issues than they may have some six
months ago when the war was still fresh on everyone's minds.
While Fonseka may be short on specific s for his economic
plan, it nonetheless is more detailed than the Rajapaksa plan
thus far, and his attacks on the cost of the Rajapaksas'
corruption may well resonate.
RAJAPAKSA PROMISES RELEASE
OF SOME DETAINEES
--------------------------
¶8. (C) While in Jaffna, Rajapaksa told the local Catholic
COLOMBO 00000021 003.6 OF 003
Bishop that all LTTE suspects held on minor charges would be
released, pending a review of their case by the Attorney
General's office. Local media had been reporting over the
weekend that some 700 of the ex-LTTE combatants held in
Vavuniya since the end of the war had been released. Post
contacts said by January 11 they were still waiting for a
formal court order allowing their release.
RAJAPAKSA MANIFESTO
-------------------
¶9. (C) President Rajapaksa released his own manifesto
document on January 11. Post will report in more detail in
the next elections update cable once a full english
translation is obtained, but early reports are that the
document is less specific in its promises when compared with
Fonseka's manifesto.
COMMENT: WHO WILL WIN?
-----------------------
¶10. (C) This election is still very much up in the air.
Polls here are very scattered and likely to be statistically
unreliable, but anecdotal evidence shows a growth in support
for Fonseka. Rajapaksa still has an enormous advantage in
his illegal use of state resources, but the idea of "change"
is becoming the issue of the day, even if Fonseka has not yet
provided specifics on how to achieve all his promises of
change. Initial contact with voters in rural areas shows a
focus on economic issues rather than security.
COMMENT: IF FONSEKA, WHAT NEXT?
------------------------------
¶11. (C) Some local political analysts have begun to entertain
scenarios of what might happen in the Sri Lankan government
if Fonseka did win. Early opinions say that the wide-spread
UNF coalition he has assembled had no intention of staying
together for parliamentary elections. Indeed Post local
political staff are finding that local political organizers,
in particular those from the JVP, are squirreling away
presidential campaign funds to use for their own
parliamentary campaigns. The JVP is showing its
organizational strength on the ground and is likely to
benefit in general elections. Some are saying that if
Rajapaksa loses, his family's fortunes in the SLFP will end,
and it will revert back to its more historic form. Rumors
have cropped up in the past week that former President
Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga may announce her support
for Fonseka, with her son Vimukthi Kumaratunga at her side.
This then would serve as Vimukthi's entrance into the
political world, and a passing of the torch to the next
generation of the Bandaranaike family, which has been deeply
involved in Sri Lankan politics for some 300 years.
Interestingly, Mangala Samaraweera, seen by many as the
brains behind Fonseka's campaign strategy, also ran
Chandrika's presidential campaign and was known as one of her
close confidantes. He is thought by some to be a possible
candidate for Prime Minister in a Fonseka administration.
End Comment.
FOWLER
source cable from US embassy colombo wikileaks
ඔක්කොම හොරු
Last edited:
ඒ ෆන්ඩ්ස් අරගත්තෙ ප්ලෑන් B එකට, ඒ කිව්වෙ ෆොන්සේකා පැරදුනොත් එයාට පාර්ලිමේන්තු එන්න ඉඩක් හදන එකට, 2010 කුසලානෙන් ආවෙ ඒකයි.
මහින්ද ගේන්න පක්ෂෙ සල්ලිවලින් කැම්පේන් එක කලේ.
ෆොන්සේකා ගේන්නත් පක්ෂෙන් සල්ලි දැම්ම. එහෙම දාල වැඩියක් පෙනුනු සල්ලි ආපහු අරගෙන ප්ලෑන් බී එකකට දැම්මෙ.
අම්මටසිරි උබ දැකල නේ ... මමයි දැකල නැත්තේ
Last edited:
කොහොම උනත් එක හොරකමක් නෙවීද?
එකඊ මම කියන්නෙ මෙ මෑතිවරනෙට එන ඔක්කොම ඔක්කොම හොරු......
you have to choose wisely.......
නැහැ. ඒක හොරකමක් නෙමෙයි. ජවිපෙ ෆොන්සේකට අවස්ථාවක් නොදී තනියම ඉල්ලුවනම් හොරකමක් වෙන්න ඉඩක් තියෙනව. මේක කරන්නෙ ෆොන්සේකගෙ අනුදැනුම උඩ.
මචන් ජනාදිපතිවරනයකට එක මිනිහෙකුට වියදම් කරන්න බෑ. විශෙශයෙන් ෆොන්සෙකා මහතා වගෙ රජයෙ සෙවකයකු වෙලා හිටපු කෙනෙකුට, එකට fund කරන්නෙ වෙනත් අය සහ සන්විදාන. එටකොට එවා ජනාදිපතිවරනෙ දිනන්න දෙන සල්ලි එම ජනාදිපතිවරනයට නොයොදා වෙන කටයුතු වලට යෙදිම ඒ fundig කරපු මිනිස්සුන්ට කරන වරදක් එහෙමත් නෑත්නම් හොරකමක් නෙවේඊ ද?
මචන් දෙශපාලන ලොකයෙ හොද මිනිසුන් සෙවීම ගනිකාවකගෙන් කන්යාභාවය බලාපොරොත්තු වන්නා වෑන්නකි.
Similar threads
