Don't see the point of asking real questions from youand I am not accusing you, seriusly... would a court accuse some one who's mentally impaired? i.e someone who sees and believes imaginary things...(ex: Supreme ඉන්ද්රිය®)
![]()
![]()
![]()
Glad you understood that there is no point in this thread anymore. I realized it long time ago when you brought illogical, non-practical straight-road analogy to save your butt for something very obvious. I clearly understood that your point is not to get anything from the discussion but to prove your point. I'm done with this already.
So you came up with this by yourself, not because it was in the book?
My interpretation of manasikara is not relevant (or even important) here because it can be wrong, I am more interested in your interpretation of it because it is something I’ve never heard of, how did you come to conclution that “යෝනිසෝ මනසිකාර” is “මනෝ ඉන්ද්රිය බල රහිත කරල කරන එක”?
You have no need to rely on my interpretation. I said this many times. If you dont see anything wrong with yours, no point of showing you anything else. You will be scanning through your already polarized glasses to verify and will automatically be rejected without even proper evaluation. Waste of time. Believe me, you will never find anything other than what you believe is right. Coz, anything comes to your eyes is already polarized by your glasses and already rejected.
Check whatever interpretation you have makes sense achieving those what were listed in ayoniso-manasikara sutta..If it does, move on. If it doesnt find what's wrong.
Any arahath scholars who said that?
If I can borrow your arihat detector, I may test it for you.



BTW, how many arihats have you been listening to this far?



Ok so you are not creative... no probs..piggyback on mine then![]()
Oh no thanks. Not a fan of creative jokes like straight-roads, bla bla bla..

Not sure, you are hard to read, due to your DID![]()
Why do you wanna read me, when you have never read what i said correctly this far.


Last edited: