රාවණා

Edward Kenway

Well-known member
  • Jan 8, 2015
    3,623
    712
    113
    They were hindus.of course they believed in it.what about srinivasa ramanujan.he claimed that a godess gave him the maths.What i meant is that they all touched a dimension not limited to logic.that's why they were able to come with amazing logics that can contribute.
    What makes you think them being hindus had anything to do with their contributions to logic?

    What proves that they "touched" a "dimension" that is beyong logic?
     

    sthumi

    Well-known member
  • Apr 9, 2009
    2,140
    149
    63
    jesus,buddh ect they are not fairy tails, all of them have tangible and well proved solid evidence

    Bro i really disagree on it.what are the well proved proofs other than few books and statues.even ravana has self written books and they are avaialble now.only statue is missing.but there are temples build in his name for worship.
    dude seriously?
     

    Emios

    Well-known member
  • Dec 10, 2009
    28,330
    6,591
    113
    What makes you think them being hindus had anything to do with their contributions to logic?

    What proves that they "touched" a "dimension" that is beyong logic?
    he always claimed that godess namagiri gave him the maths in dreams.he's a phsycopath according to science logic?
     

    Edward Kenway

    Well-known member
  • Jan 8, 2015
    3,623
    712
    113
    he always claimed that godess namagiri gave him the maths in dreams.he's a phsycopath according to science logic?
    No, just blindfolded by faith. Arabic scholars have done significant contributions to mathematics, so if be trust maths should we believe in allah too? Are those two mutually inclusive?
     

    Emios

    Well-known member
  • Dec 10, 2009
    28,330
    6,591
    113
    No, just blindfolded by faith. Arabic scholars have done significant contributions to mathematics, so if be trust maths should we believe in allah too? Are those two mutually inclusive?
    my point is they all believed in something.so you can't say they don't deserve the modern world.The real backbone for the new society was them.the blindfolded ones.
     

    Edward Kenway

    Well-known member
  • Jan 8, 2015
    3,623
    712
    113
    my point is they all believed in something.so you can't say they don't deserve the modern world.The real backbone for the new society was them.the blindfolded ones.

    Their believes were not the reason we regard them as primary contributors to the modern world but their logical thinking and reasoning.

    People are capable of being logical and illogical at different matters. none of us are black or white, rather grey.
     

    Emios

    Well-known member
  • Dec 10, 2009
    28,330
    6,591
    113

    Their believes were not the reason we regard them as primary contributors to the modern world but their logical thinking and reasoning.

    People are capable of being logical and illogical at different matters. none of us are black or white, rather grey.
    how are you sure about it?may be or may not be.when the founder says it was given by a godess why we should neglect it as it was not the reason.what if it was the reason?
     

    Edward Kenway

    Well-known member
  • Jan 8, 2015
    3,623
    712
    113
    how are you sure about it?may be or may not be.when the founder says it was given by a godess why we should neglect it as it was not the reason.what if it was the reason?
    Because we should not believe anything "coz he says". Simple enough?

    Their findings we not simply accepted, why should the reason be any different?
     

    sthumi

    Well-known member
  • Apr 9, 2009
    2,140
    149
    63
    Why bro is there really any solid proofs?can anyone walk in water,made wine our of water or monks fly in air?anybody proved it?we are only die hard believers isn't it?

    I am talking about archeological proves... first we need to talk about the physical findings then we can go into the spiritual things.


    if you consider how old the pyramids are and how much physical proves we have, where is the evidences for Ravana...? just bunch of caves and myths..


    bTW gotta go to bed
     

    Emios

    Well-known member
  • Dec 10, 2009
    28,330
    6,591
    113
    Because we should not believe anything "coz he says". Simple enough?

    Their findings we not simply accepted, why should the reason be any different?
    then what about buddhism?it is not simply accepted when buddha says he can talk to several galaxies at a time?we must believe something?
     

    Emios

    Well-known member
  • Dec 10, 2009
    28,330
    6,591
    113
    I am talking about archeological proves... first we need to talk about the physical findings then we can go into the spiritual things.


    if you consider how old the pyramids are and how much physical proves we have, where is the evidences for Ravana...? just bunch of caves and myths..


    bTW gotta go to bed
    there are evidence but people are not ready to accept.egyptians say they build the pyramid but still not sure.now here people say kshyapa build the sigiriya but not sure.
     

    smother

    Well-known member
  • Jan 27, 2009
    20,147
    1,414
    113
    31
    Six Feet Under

    This is different,the stone is cut and lifted.such a massive stone.he's not the benchmark but you don't have any facts to prove he didn't exist either?
    mage deyyo listen, I'm not trying to prove he didn't exist (even though my personal opinion is most of the things are just myth) what I'm trying to emphasize is, those who talk about and Ravana and trying to relieve the history about Ravana, and trying to prove that everything was done by Ravana, thus far prove nothing. I repeat they did noting but earn money on youtube.
     

    Mohowk

    Well-known member
  • Jun 14, 2018
    10,749
    4,654
    113
    Wakanda
    there are evidence but people are not ready to accept.egyptians say they build the pyramid but still not sure.now here people say kshyapa build the sigiriya but not sure.
    As the #MeToo movement barrels forward, as record numbers of women seek office, and as the Women’s March drives the resistance against the Trump administration, feminism is reaching a level of cultural relevance it hasn’t enjoyed in years. It’s now a major object of cultural discourse — which has led to some very confusing conversations because not everyone is familiar with or agrees on the basic terminology of feminism. And one of the most basic and most confusing terms has to do with waves of feminism.
     

    Emios

    Well-known member
  • Dec 10, 2009
    28,330
    6,591
    113
    mage deyyo listen, I'm not trying to prove he didn't exist (even though my personal opinion is most of the things are just myth) what I'm trying to emphasize is, those who talk about and Ravana and trying to relieve the history about Ravana, and trying to prove that everything was done by Ravana, thus far prove nothing. I repeat they did noting but earn money on youtube.
    The thing is first they dont have the capacity to do any major work.like sonar mapping sigirya etc.goverment doesnt allow to see if theres any hole in sigiriya entrance.They keep asking for the same permission.other point is his techonlogy is different than modern methods its hard for them to attain those mind states or manifest them.only looking for phsyical proofs is the only way that can prove to general public.But theres a lack may be because of distruction by enemy force.Few bit and pieces are there not enough to come to a conclusion.Good for them if they earn an income.But i'm interested.not being able to prove enough evidence is ok with me.even in india the only proof to show that buddha existed is a single pillar writing made by dharmashoka.others are all conclusions.his birth plave and all.
     

    Emios

    Well-known member
  • Dec 10, 2009
    28,330
    6,591
    113
    Its not even ravana.All sinhala history is a madness in today words.They talk about 10 large human beings of dutugemunu.One is capable of creating a lake by himself.We cant take all as just written madness.
     

    thilinasack

    New member
    Jan 12, 2009
    49
    12
    0
    I watch DhanushVlogs and That other guy Gayan (if I'm not mistaken), thus far I found nothing but full of bullshit and hours of speeches. they failed to reveal anything.
    Everyone is making assumptions. I know, when dig into historical stuff sometimes you have to make some assumptions, but rely on it 100% is freaking mental.
    that's correct. even i have the same doubt. and why both of them showing that Ravana as a underground human being? that guy who is with Dhanush logs, every time when he says something he said he is responsible for sll these evidences. yet, always showing stones and fancy stories around them :D
     

    smother

    Well-known member
  • Jan 27, 2009
    20,147
    1,414
    113
    31
    Six Feet Under
    The thing is first they dont have the capacity to do any major work.like sonar mapping sigirya etc.goverment doesnt allow to see if theres any hole in sigiriya entrance.They keep asking for the same permission.other point is his techonlogy is different than modern methods its hard for them to attain those mind states or manifest them.only looking for phsyical proofs is the only way that can prove to general public.But theres a lack may be because of distruction by enemy force.Few bit and pieces are there not enough to come to a conclusion.Good for them if they earn an income.But i'm interested.not being able to prove enough evidence is ok with me.even in india the only proof to show that buddha existed is a single pillar writing made by dharmashoka.others are all conclusions.his birth plave and all.
    Even I would like if these people find something out of nothing, so that nobody gonna complain about Ravana. The problem is even after years and years they are still failed. Good luck with the investigation anyway.

    Regarding your earlier comment about Dasa maha yodhayo, even I don't think there were giants like Aegir and Ran, but I do believe there were muscular people ( worriers ) led Dutugamunu's army. these people could do some stuff which other people cannot do and they tend to belive or I strongly believe because of their dictator or military mindset other people stay humble and serve as slaves. ( that's my personal opinion ).

    about the buddha, I do believe one man cannot gather that much data, so buddha is a set of people. ( you have all the rights to go against me)
    I'd rather talk about Ravana here than Buddha because people get offended when talking about religions. :D