LTTE ekta kade yane eun!!!

[siripala]

We Don't want bloody war Pleaseeeeeeeeeeeeeee Stop the War. I'm member of ANTI WAR FRONT

 

[siripala]

We don't want bloody war. Apita samaya ona

 

[bokka]

We don't want bloody war. Apita samaya ona

pu** dheela gana samayaknam one naha.

 

[GTRZ]

pu** dheela gana samayaknam one naha.

Hell true machan

 

[sld]

We don't want bloody war. Apita samaya ona

Eka kiyapan prabakaranta...

 

[kasshapa]

Eka kiyapan prabakaranta...

Yes that really true

All ANTI WAR peoples say to stop war to Sri Lanka government and government army. Why they can’t at less put news paper message saying stop war to LTTE?

They never do it

 

[Wal Bada]

I Strongly oppose your idea about the Tamils. Even before vijeya came to Sri Lanka Dravidan people lived in This land (nagar, Iyakar). This wikipedia article may be written by Sinhalese... Wat is the evident you have???? Even in the Ramayana story it's says about the Hindu King Ravana of the sri Lanka. The only evidence you have is mahavamsa, which we don't belive in. None of the Sri Lankan Tamils belive in your statement.

My dear friend, prove that Dravidians were here before Sinhalese with materialistic evidence!!

You may have heard of Prof Neelakantha Shasthri, greatest of the Tamil historians. He also accepts that Mahavansa to be true. Mahavansa is true not because it is said to be true. cross references to chinese, indian, greek and roman literature just show silmilar records. Raavanaa story is a unproven folk story. Some think that Lankaapura of Raavanaa was a part of India and not SL!

Raavanaa was not a Hindu king. Hinduism started only about 1500 years ago in the Kushna era of India. Vedhas may be 5000 years old. But what parts of vedhas teach is to kill animals for offerings. How it is connected to Hindism which prohibits killing than any other religion? these 5000 year old system is not Hinduism, but called Upanishad and Vaidika religions.

And mahavansa is not the only evidence. Throughout the North East area there are ruins of buddhist shrines, but very little hindu shrines. No hindu shrines are found more than 1000 years old. Even the names of north was changed by tamil surveyers when they were making maps under British.
Ex-
Hunugama-Chunnakam
Thambalagamuwa - Thampalakamama
Gokanna - Trincomalee
Ganthalaya - Kanthei
Digamadulla - Amparai
Malwathu Oya - Aruvi Aru
Mahwil Oya - Mavil Aru
Thiriyaya - Thiriyayi
Naagadeepa - Nainativu
Dambakolapatuna - Kankasanthurai

Then little bit on the medical side. The Tamils in SL are descending fro Sinhalese!!!!!!! mutations of thalassemia gene which is responsible for blood disorder called thalassemia is unique to races. Mutations of Sinhalese differ from that of South Indians. It is similar to that of Bengalis. SL Tamils' mutations are more similar to Sinhalese than South Indians, hence proving that most of Tamils in SL (barring in the hills) are descending from Sinhalese

My dear Mayuresan, tou have been very ignorant and has digested what Tamil nationalists have been teacing you without analysing that. Plese be little careful in presenting these kinds of facts as you will look foolish when somebody challenges you with evidence.

 

[Wal Bada]

We Don't want bloody war Pleaseeeeeeeeeeeeeee Stop the War. I'm member of ANTI WAR FRONT

Tell it in tamil and tell it to LTTE, and tell it in Kilinochchi

 

[sld]

My dear friend, prove that Dravidians were here before Sinhalese with materialistic evidence!!

You may have heard of Prof Neelakantha Shasthri, greatest of the Tamil historians. He also accepts that Mahavansa to be true. Mahavansa is true not because it is said to be true. cross references to chinese, indian, greek and roman literature just show silmilar records. Raavanaa story is a unproven folk story. Some think that Lankaapura of Raavanaa was a part of India and not SL!

Raavanaa was not a Hindu king. Hinduism started only about 1500 years ago in the Kushna era of India. Vedhas may be 5000 years old. But what parts of vedhas teach is to kill animals for offerings. How it is connected to Hindism which prohibits killing than any other religion? these 5000 year old system is not Hinduism, but called Upanishad and Vaidika religions.

And mahavansa is not the only evidence. Throughout the North East area there are ruins of buddhist shrines, but very little hindu shrines. No hindu shrines are found more than 1000 years old. Even the names of north was changed by tamil surveyers when they were making maps under British.
Ex-
Hunugama-Chunnakam
Thambalagamuwa - Thampalakamama
Gokanna - Trincomalee
Ganthalaya - Kanthei
Digamadulla - Amparai
Malwathu Oya - Aruvi Aru
Mahwil Oya - Mavil Aru
Thiriyaya - Thiriyayi
Naagadeepa - Nainativu
Dambakolapatuna - Kankasanthurai

Then little bit on the medical side. The Tamils in SL are descending fro Sinhalese!!!!!!! mutations of thalassemia gene which is responsible for blood disorder called thalassemia is unique to races. Mutations of Sinhalese differ from that of South Indians. It is similar to that of Bengalis. SL Tamils' mutations are more similar to Sinhalese than South Indians, hence proving that most of Tamils in SL (barring in the hills) are descending from Sinhalese

My dear Mayuresan, tou have been very ignorant and has digested what Tamil nationalists have been teacing you without analysing that. Plese be little careful in presenting these kinds of facts as you will look foolish when somebody challenges you with evidence.

Wow machan thank you for this information. I learned some things too. Again thank you.

 

[Agent_47]

Well I must say that the present government is in part responsible for this war. If war can be prevented then its better to do so. I'm not justifying LTTE's acts. THey are a terrorist group. it mostly consists of inhumans. But you can't say that people who are against this war are people who, as u said, Kadae yanawa 4 da LTTE. No one lives forever!!!!!!. So why ruin the little time we have to live on war?

Sadly the question of war or no war is not in our hands alone. If the L.T.T.E. keeps on butchering innocent civillians and decimating the Tamil people then the Government has no choice but to respond as it is their duty to protect the citizens of the country. Nobody wanted war in the first place. This war was forced upon the Sinhalese, Tamils and Muslims of our Nation by a genocidal megalomaniac, the "Surya Thevan" Mr. Velupillai Prabhakaran and his bunch of cronies. Hundreds of thousands of Tamil people living in Vanni and Kilinochchi etc are waiting to be liberated. We should not fail them as they too have the right to liberty, equality and freedom. These are being denied to them by the L.T.T.E. terrorists. If we abandon them to the mercy of the Tigers, we commit a great crime. Peace for the sake of peace is not real peace at all. The L.T.T.E. have to be stopped now or never. You see, the same mistake was made back in the 1930's with Hitler and where did that lead to? World War II. If the Allies had drawn the line and stopped Hitler while he was weak then the war could have been averted. Instead they opted for a pacifist strategy and in the end millions had to pay for it with their lives.

 

[Agent_47]

Dear all!
As a Tamil guy I have to say my thoughts in this present situation in this country.

You have to admit that once we had a ethnic conflict in this country but now the situation is different. Now no ethnic conflict bcos I'm tamil but I'm in colombo. I feel more safe here than being in Trinco or Jaffna.

When Sri Lanka got independance from British tamil leaders asked for a unitary state not a seperate state, but some sinhala leaders mis used it and did something which can stive the feelings of the Tamils. Till late 70's there were no arm conflict in Sri Lanka only ahimsa protests were hold. Then later on LTTE took the power by beating their opponets.

Till sinhala people feel the problems of the tamil people there will be no solution in this country. bcos LTTE never win the war meanwhile Gov can't fully destroy LTTE.. Thats true.

Please dont' mis understand me..

If only all the Tamil people thought like you we would have resolved this issue ages ago. The Tamil people do have legitimate grievances which our chauvinistic leaders on both sides twisted out of proportion to their favour. The L.T.T.E. hijacked the grievances of the Tamil people and used them in order to create a mafia state for itself to rule. The Tiger terrorists have been the direct and indirect cause of the Tamil people's suffering for decades. Only once we wipe these scum out will we be able to sit down and talk to the genuine Tamil leaders.

 

[shali]

tttttttt

 

[Wal Bada]

tttttttt

Pissuda? Hatida? Pissuwe hatida?

 

[mayooresan]

We Don't want bloody war Pleaseeeeeeeeeeeeeee Stop the War. I'm member of ANTI WAR FRONT

I'm with you man!!!

 

[mayooresan]

Ok if Tamils won’t believe “mahavamsa” then what is the history you believe?

Do you say in Sri Lanka Sinhala people have believed one history and Tamil people must believe another one?

So this is way we going to make one country?

This is how you people made us feel different!!!
You think Sri Lanka is a country of Sinhalse ONLY and Tamils are just invaders from S.India!!!
but it's unfair... We are part of this country and only becos we are minority you just can't say we are just came from india!!!

Do you know that even befor the Aryas Dravidans in this subcontinent area.... Arya's are invaded from the nort (Afganistan etc) so in india wats the point??? can anyone tell north indians were invaders?

 

[mayooresan]

I really don't get why people would have different country histories, though they are living in the same country. You can't really say a country belongs to the people who lived there first. Then america belongs to RED indians.

Many groups of people came to this country because it was in the center of some trading route. But really you can't get evidence from stories like Ramayana. Many people might have come from india because its pretty close. But in the end the main language was sinhala. You coudn't even rule the country if you were'nt sinhala.

Yeah man you are correct and your examples are perfect...
In America and Australia the indiginous people were become minority!!! it's a very good example we have seen in the past century!! This is all I can SAY

 

[mayooresan]

Well.. It's true that nobody wants war! But its also true that there is so much burden the people would take before they really had enough of it?? I mean 25 years!!! Man.... that’s a lot.... its the silver jubilee now for this war!!!

In the past, maybe Sinhalese politicians might have done things that lead to discrimination of Tamil people, but a 25 old war is definitely not the answer. And I'm talking from experience that I have seen Tamil people around the world living in environments even though there are lot of discrimination for them. in an environments where the Tamil students apply for IT courses in govt. universities but they only get Agriculture, why this problem only in SL???

I see few reasons, our country has a Buddhist culture so by nature we tent to give freedom (Buddhism taught how to be democratic long before it was invented), and our politicians are very weak, whole politics SUCKS! for that matter! Tamils must understand that they live in a country where more than 70% is Sinhalese Buddhists and any country works for majority NOT for minority that's the way it is, whether you like it or not! Only thing they can do is to adopt to it, they have done it in rest of the world.. so why not in Sri Lanka??

And as for LTTE.. F**K them.. They are not Tamil people's savior, they are some blood & power thirsty lunatics head by the Praba the "Dick head"!!! I stand by govt. decision to attack, and pls this time DONT STOP!!! until they put down their arms.

I have Tamil friends, I treat them as my buddys because we respect each others differences.. I'm sure all of us can do that, but by hurting the MAJORITY of a country wont help anybodies cause!

Typical Sinhala thought!!!

LTTE's way is wrong but the way you think is very much wrong!!

A country work for only majority!! If it's the situation we will never see a powerfull nation called india.. You must learn to live in Diversity bcos Sri Lanka is a multi ethnic country.. Sinhalese is a mojority in the country except North and East. Is this how you see democrasy through the Buddhism????

C'mon man understand us!!!

 

[mayooresan]

Well.. I gotta say that some who contributed to this thread have come to certain idea of comparing Singapore and Sri Lanka.. Actually this is very funny!

Its true that Singapore is technologically advanced than Sri Lanka and regarded as the technology hub of Asia Pacific, but that's all to it....

When you talk about Sri Lanka, The history of Sri Lanka it self goes beyond 5000 years (lately they have proven that Mr.Paranawithana was wrong, real age of Sri Lankan history is over 5000 years), if you wanna compare Sri Lanka, this puts our nation par with civilizations such as Rome, Egypt etc..!!!

Remember this........ Sri Lanka can one day become Singapore but Singapore can never become Sri Lanka, simply because time doesn’t travel backwards to give them the history and rich culture that we have!

Singapore's billboards maybe in Tamil and its probably their official language.. and that's because their president is Tamil, which is not the case in Sri Lanka, Let me give a tip for people who wondering how to tell a nation's mother tongue and their official languages... Turn to their national anthems in which language the national anthem, that is the official language of that country!

And Mr.mayooresan you say you dont believe "Mahavamsa"? Let me tell you something... Mahavamsa says a King named Dutugamunu was here and in his time Ruwanmali Maha Saya was constructed, and it is indeed there if haven’t noticed !!! so what the book says is already exist! so please don’t question about the history of Sinhalese people or Sri Lanka!! Because it looks Stupid when a graduate from Kelaniya talks like that..instead use your knowledge to investigate "How did Hanuman bought a piece of Himalaya all by himself "

And one more thing, if you question about how free the Tamils in Sri Lanka look no further than yourself.. You are dare to put your personal info on a public forum and question about the history of Sinhalese, yet you still live well!!! You wouldn’t escape if it was in another country.. That’s how free Sri Lanka is for you!!!

Im sorry guys if this was too lengthy, but I must say what has to be said to protect our nation!

Don't you know that in Sri Lanka also Tamil is a Official language and Even in India the president is Tamil... But sri Lanka never had a single Tamil president or prime minister.

I said the story bcos it was written long ago and it gives the idea that dravidans presense in this country from the ancient time....

 

[sld]

Don't you know that in Sri Lanka also Tamil is a Official language and Even in India the president is Tamil... But sri Lanka never had a single Tamil president or prime minister.

I said the story bcos it was written long ago and it gives the idea that dravidans presense in this country from the ancient time....

Well as long as you keep talking about Sinhalese and Tamils there will be a division until everyone thinks of them as Sri lankans.
Why do you always go by what happened with other countries. Sri Lanka is different from India, Singapore, USA and every other country in the world. Thinking Sri Lanka should be like some other country or how it was thousands of years ago leads to idiots strapping bombs up thier ass and blowing them self up in the middle some innocent people.
Now tell me buddy I'm a Sri Lankan .... What are you???

 

[mayooresan]

My dear friend, prove that Dravidians were here before Sinhalese with materialistic evidence!!

You may have heard of Prof Neelakantha Shasthri, greatest of the Tamil historians. He also accepts that Mahavansa to be true. Mahavansa is true not because it is said to be true. cross references to chinese, indian, greek and roman literature just show silmilar records. Raavanaa story is a unproven folk story. Some think that Lankaapura of Raavanaa was a part of India and not SL!

Raavanaa was not a Hindu king. Hinduism started only about 1500 years ago in the Kushna era of India. Vedhas may be 5000 years old. But what parts of vedhas teach is to kill animals for offerings. How it is connected to Hindism which prohibits killing than any other religion? these 5000 year old system is not Hinduism, but called Upanishad and Vaidika religions.

And mahavansa is not the only evidence. Throughout the North East area there are ruins of buddhist shrines, but very little hindu shrines. No hindu shrines are found more than 1000 years old. Even the names of north was changed by tamil surveyers when they were making maps under British.
Ex-
Hunugama-Chunnakam
Thambalagamuwa - Thampalakamama
Gokanna - Trincomalee
Ganthalaya - Kanthei
Digamadulla - Amparai
Malwathu Oya - Aruvi Aru
Mahwil Oya - Mavil Aru
Thiriyaya - Thiriyayi
Naagadeepa - Nainativu
Dambakolapatuna - Kankasanthurai

Then little bit on the medical side. The Tamils in SL are descending fro Sinhalese!!!!!!! mutations of thalassemia gene which is responsible for blood disorder called thalassemia is unique to races. Mutations of Sinhalese differ from that of South Indians. It is similar to that of Bengalis. SL Tamils' mutations are more similar to Sinhalese than South Indians, hence proving that most of Tamils in SL (barring in the hills) are descending from Sinhalese

My dear Mayuresan, tou have been very ignorant and has digested what Tamil nationalists have been teacing you without analysing that. Plese be little careful in presenting these kinds of facts as you will look foolish when somebody challenges you with evidence.

Wat I can say to your evidence
Who told you ravana is not a Hindu as from an Indian! he is a very hard follower of god shiva!!
Hindusiam is more older than buddhism it's roots go beyond 9000 years

refer
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Hinduism

and you said that there are some buddhist shrines in North - East. It gives the presense of Budhhist not the Sinhalese... You know 5 epics in Tamil. 2 out of 5 is based on Buddhism.. Once buddhism has become a mjor religion in india but later again hindusium become dominant... thre were Tamil buddhist lived.. Even in Tamil nadu.

Even today in Kerala hindu temples are opened only for hindus and buddhist can also enter bcos buddhism roots joins with the hidusim

I can say like this several examples
veli oya - Manal aru
thirukonamalai (tri means three and malai means mountain) - Trincomalee

like this many more examples I can also give....

Now it's not necessary to talk this matters.. All we need is understanding we dont have to bother about the past... I still belive you people have mislead with bad leaders and one day you 'll understand us.