Latest ads
-
Handmade Character Soft Toys- anil1961
- Updated:
-
Bodim.lk out now !- Manoj Suranga Bandara
- Updated:
-
Power Lifting Lever Belt- SkullVamp
- Updated:
-
port.lk Domain for sale
- Lankan-Tech
- Updated:
-
Colombo Kaduwela - Two Storey House for Sale- dilrasan
- Updated:
Meka Boruwakda ????? (LTTE Aircraft)
- Thread starter nrjayasinghe
- Start date
How Conspiracy Theories Work
function showCitation() { var cite = document.getElementById("citation"); if (cite.style.visibility == "visible") { cite.style.visibility = "hidden"; cite.style.position = "absolute"; } else { cite.style.visibility = "visible"; cite.style.position = "relative"; } } function hideCitation() { var cite = document.getElementById("citation"); cite.style.visibility = "hidden"; cite.style.position = "absolute"; } Cite This!
Close
Please copy/paste the following text to properly cite this HowStuffWorks article:
Brain, Marshall. "How Conspiracy Theories Work." 13 July 2006. HowStuffWorks.com. <http://people.howstuffworks.com/conspiracy-theory.htm> 21 February 2009.
Introduction to How Conspiracy Theories Work
Are you the kind of person who likes to hear to a good conspiracy theory? Some people simply do not like the discomfort that a conspiracy theory creates. But for others, conspiracy theories are intriguing. They like to explore all of the possibilities that a conspiracy theory presents, in the same way that they like to explore puzzles or mystery novels. Sometimes a conspiracy theory is ridiculous and learning about it is a form of entertainment. Or you may find that the theory is credible and it makes you think. It's interesting to consider the theory, weigh the evidence and come up with a conclusion.
In the 21st century, one event reigns supreme in the catalog of conspiracy theories: the September 11, 2001 attack on the United States. This event is seared into the nation's consciousness and significantly affected the entire planet. It seems inevitable that people would cry "conspiracy" about any event with this much impact. However, the conspiracy theories around 9/11 have been strong and consistent.
[FONT=arial,helvetica]
[SIZE=-2]AP Photo/Chao Soi Cheong[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]Smoke billows from one of the towers of the World Trade Center and flames and debris explode from the other tower, September 11, 2001. See more pictures of the World Trade Center.[/SIZE]
[/FONT]
Up Next
*The whole controversy surrounding 9/11 boils down to one simple question:
Did 19 terrorists cause all of the destruction witnessed on 9/11/2001, or did a group of people in the U.S. government conspire to create that destruction for political gain?
The U.S. government has offered the terrorist explanation, and that is the story that many people believe. A large number of people, however, refuse to believe this "official story." They believe conspiracy theorists when they say that the U.S. government actually masterminded and executed the attack.
We could spend a great deal of time arguing one side or the other. Instead, we'll focus on the process. Isn't it fascinating that there can be two credible explanations for such a complex event, and that both explanations can be so diametrically opposed to one another?
How does a conspiracy theory like this get started? What is required to fuel it into a full-fledged public debate? Can the theory ever be proven? What does the possibility of the theory say about our society? In this article we will explore these questions and many others as we look at the events of September 11.
Conspiracy Theory Basics
[FONT=arial,helvetica]
[SIZE=-2]Image courtesy Amazon[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]Oliver Stone's 1991 film "JFK" addresses a controversial version of the events surrounding John F. Kennedy's assassination.[/SIZE]
[/FONT] The dictionary defines a conspiracy theory in this way:
In modern times there have been a number of "conspiracy theories." One example is the assassination of John F. Kennedy. After the assassination, the government offered its explanation of the events. A large number of people (at one point, more than half of the adult population in the United States) simply do not believe the government's explanation. This particular conspiracy theory rose to such a high level in the public consciousness that an entire Hollywood movie was made about it: "JFK", directed by Oliver Stone and released in 1991.
The Kennedy assassination really started the modern "conspiracy theory" movement. This is an event where the "official" government explanation of the crime was openly ridiculed by a large number of "normal citizens." Many people believe that the Kennedy assassination was carried out as part of a larger government-centered conspiracy, rather than as a random event arranged by a single gunman.
In the same way, a very large number of people do not believe that "terrorists" carried out the events seen on 9/11. Instead, they believe that the government caused those events.
Next, we'll look at how conspiracy theories get started.
[FONT=arial,helvetica] [/FONT][FONT=arial,helvetica][SIZE=+1]More on the Kennedy Assassination[/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=arial,helvetica][SIZE=-1] [/SIZE][/FONT]
The events of 9/11/2001 are five years in the past, yet they are still a part of everyday life. Zacarias Moussaoui just began serving a life sentence after being convicted of taking part in the planning of the attack. At his trial, a large number of people recounted the horror of 9/11. The government also publicly played the tape from the cockpit voice recorder of Flight 93 for the first time. In addition, the movie "Flight 93" opened recently, with a huge amount of surrounding publicity. All of these events support the "official story" -- that terrorists hijacked four airplanes and crashed three of them into different targets, with passengers on the fourth flight forcing the jet down before it could do any damage. Given the strength of the official story, the amount of evidence to support it and the fact that it has survived for five years without any significant public challenge, how can a conspiracy theory around 9/11 get started?
[FONT=arial,helvetica]
[SIZE=-2]AP Photo/Carmen Taylor[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]A jet airliner lined up on one of the World Trade Center Towers on Tuesday, Sept. 11, 2001. [/SIZE]
[/FONT] To understand how a conspiracy theory begins, let's look at the major events of 9/11. Most of us are familiar with this story because it has been repeated in the major media literally thousands of times and many of us lived through it as it happened. Here's a timeline of the events:
As more and more evidence was released over the next several days, it became clear what happened: 19 terrorists hijacked four airplanes and caused massive destruction.
This is a pretty straightforward story. Hundreds of planes have been hijacked by terrorists in the past, so it is easy to imagine a coordinated attack on four airplanes at once. The idea of using planes as giant flying bombs was new and ingenious, but within the realm of possibility. It is very easy to believe the official story.
So for a conspiracy theory to get started, there has to be something that a conspiracy theorist can use, something that doesn't make sense. In some conspiracy theories, it's something very small. But in the case of 9/11, there are four big things that do not make much sense in the official story. These things include:
Next we'll look at how conspiracy theorists gather evidence and build a case for another explanation.
Building a Case
Here is the interesting thing about a conspiracy theory. The theory does have to start with some sort of discrepancy, but from that point the theorist has to explain everything that happened in a believable way. If the theorist cannot do that, then the theory is not going to hold up and no one will believe it. So he has to do a lot of work gathering evidence and looking for alternative explanations. Let's look at an example of how this might work. Assume that the conspiracy theorist looks at the fall of WTC 7. The theorist notes that the building did not partially collapse or crumple -- it fell exactly like a building would if the building were being demolished. So the theorist hypothesizes that the fall of WTC 7 was a pre-planned demolition rather than an actual, natural collapse of the building. The first thing that the theorist must do is to show that WTC 7 could credibly be conceived as a demolition. How might he make that determination? He might consider facts like these:
function showCitation() { var cite = document.getElementById("citation"); if (cite.style.visibility == "visible") { cite.style.visibility = "hidden"; cite.style.position = "absolute"; } else { cite.style.visibility = "visible"; cite.style.position = "relative"; } } function hideCitation() { var cite = document.getElementById("citation"); cite.style.visibility = "hidden"; cite.style.position = "absolute"; } Cite This!
Close
Please copy/paste the following text to properly cite this HowStuffWorks article:
Brain, Marshall. "How Conspiracy Theories Work." 13 July 2006. HowStuffWorks.com. <http://people.howstuffworks.com/conspiracy-theory.htm> 21 February 2009.
Introduction to How Conspiracy Theories Work
Are you the kind of person who likes to hear to a good conspiracy theory? Some people simply do not like the discomfort that a conspiracy theory creates. But for others, conspiracy theories are intriguing. They like to explore all of the possibilities that a conspiracy theory presents, in the same way that they like to explore puzzles or mystery novels. Sometimes a conspiracy theory is ridiculous and learning about it is a form of entertainment. Or you may find that the theory is credible and it makes you think. It's interesting to consider the theory, weigh the evidence and come up with a conclusion.
In the 21st century, one event reigns supreme in the catalog of conspiracy theories: the September 11, 2001 attack on the United States. This event is seared into the nation's consciousness and significantly affected the entire planet. It seems inevitable that people would cry "conspiracy" about any event with this much impact. However, the conspiracy theories around 9/11 have been strong and consistent.
[FONT=arial,helvetica]
[SIZE=-2]AP Photo/Chao Soi Cheong[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]Smoke billows from one of the towers of the World Trade Center and flames and debris explode from the other tower, September 11, 2001. See more pictures of the World Trade Center.[/SIZE]
[/FONT]
Up Next
*The whole controversy surrounding 9/11 boils down to one simple question:
Did 19 terrorists cause all of the destruction witnessed on 9/11/2001, or did a group of people in the U.S. government conspire to create that destruction for political gain?
The U.S. government has offered the terrorist explanation, and that is the story that many people believe. A large number of people, however, refuse to believe this "official story." They believe conspiracy theorists when they say that the U.S. government actually masterminded and executed the attack.
We could spend a great deal of time arguing one side or the other. Instead, we'll focus on the process. Isn't it fascinating that there can be two credible explanations for such a complex event, and that both explanations can be so diametrically opposed to one another?
How does a conspiracy theory like this get started? What is required to fuel it into a full-fledged public debate? Can the theory ever be proven? What does the possibility of the theory say about our society? In this article we will explore these questions and many others as we look at the events of September 11.
Conspiracy Theory Basics
[FONT=arial,helvetica]
[SIZE=-2]Image courtesy Amazon[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]Oliver Stone's 1991 film "JFK" addresses a controversial version of the events surrounding John F. Kennedy's assassination.[/SIZE]
[/FONT] The dictionary defines a conspiracy theory in this way:
- A theory seeking to explain a disputed case or matter as a plot by a secret group or alliance rather than an individual or isolated act. [ref]
In modern times there have been a number of "conspiracy theories." One example is the assassination of John F. Kennedy. After the assassination, the government offered its explanation of the events. A large number of people (at one point, more than half of the adult population in the United States) simply do not believe the government's explanation. This particular conspiracy theory rose to such a high level in the public consciousness that an entire Hollywood movie was made about it: "JFK", directed by Oliver Stone and released in 1991.
The Kennedy assassination really started the modern "conspiracy theory" movement. This is an event where the "official" government explanation of the crime was openly ridiculed by a large number of "normal citizens." Many people believe that the Kennedy assassination was carried out as part of a larger government-centered conspiracy, rather than as a random event arranged by a single gunman.
In the same way, a very large number of people do not believe that "terrorists" carried out the events seen on 9/11. Instead, they believe that the government caused those events.
Next, we'll look at how conspiracy theories get started.
[FONT=arial,helvetica] [/FONT][FONT=arial,helvetica][SIZE=+1]More on the Kennedy Assassination[/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=arial,helvetica][SIZE=-1] [/SIZE][/FONT]
- [FONT=arial,helvetica][SIZE=-1]
- The Kennedy Assassination
- An Introduction to JFK Conspiracy Theories
- How the JFK Conspiracy Was Born
- Top Ten Conspiracy Theories of 2002[/SIZE] [/FONT]
The events of 9/11/2001 are five years in the past, yet they are still a part of everyday life. Zacarias Moussaoui just began serving a life sentence after being convicted of taking part in the planning of the attack. At his trial, a large number of people recounted the horror of 9/11. The government also publicly played the tape from the cockpit voice recorder of Flight 93 for the first time. In addition, the movie "Flight 93" opened recently, with a huge amount of surrounding publicity. All of these events support the "official story" -- that terrorists hijacked four airplanes and crashed three of them into different targets, with passengers on the fourth flight forcing the jet down before it could do any damage. Given the strength of the official story, the amount of evidence to support it and the fact that it has survived for five years without any significant public challenge, how can a conspiracy theory around 9/11 get started?
[FONT=arial,helvetica]
[SIZE=-2]AP Photo/Carmen Taylor[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]A jet airliner lined up on one of the World Trade Center Towers on Tuesday, Sept. 11, 2001. [/SIZE]
[/FONT] To understand how a conspiracy theory begins, let's look at the major events of 9/11. Most of us are familiar with this story because it has been repeated in the major media literally thousands of times and many of us lived through it as it happened. Here's a timeline of the events:
- On the morning of September 11, 2001, 19 Islamic terrorists board four domestic flights in the United States.
- 7:59 a.m. - American Airlines Flight 11 leaves Logan Airport in Boston.
- 8:14 a.m. - United Airlines Flight 175 also leaves Logan Airport.
- 8:20 a.m. - American Airlines Flight 77 leaves Dulles Airport in Washington.
- 8:41 a.m. - United Airlines flight 93 leaves Newark Airport in New Jersey.
- 8:45 a.m. - Flight 11 hits the WTC North Tower.
- 9:03 a.m. - Flight 175 hits the WTC South Tower.
- 9:25 a.m. - The FAA orders a "national ground stop" for all airplanes in the United States. No plane can take off, and all planes in the air must land.
- 9:30 a.m. - President Bush first addresses the nation and describes the events as an "apparent terrorist attack."
- 9:43 a.m. - Flight 77 hits the Pentagon.
- 10:05 a.m. - The South Tower falls.
- 10:10 a.m. - Flight 93 crashes in Pennsylvania.
- 10:10 a.m. - The wall at the Pentagon falls.
- 10:28 a.m. - The North Tower falls.
- 5:20 p.m. - WTC Building 7 falls.
- 8:30 p.m. - President Bush addresses the nation, laying the blame for the attack on terrorists.
As more and more evidence was released over the next several days, it became clear what happened: 19 terrorists hijacked four airplanes and caused massive destruction.
This is a pretty straightforward story. Hundreds of planes have been hijacked by terrorists in the past, so it is easy to imagine a coordinated attack on four airplanes at once. The idea of using planes as giant flying bombs was new and ingenious, but within the realm of possibility. It is very easy to believe the official story.
So for a conspiracy theory to get started, there has to be something that a conspiracy theorist can use, something that doesn't make sense. In some conspiracy theories, it's something very small. But in the case of 9/11, there are four big things that do not make much sense in the official story. These things include:
- Three skyscrapers collapsed. Never has a skyscraper ever collapsed because of fire. When the North and South Towers collapsed, that might have seemed believable because of the giant airplanes that crashed into them. But when WTC 7 collapsed, that was completely unprecedented.
- The way the President and his handlers acted when the second plane crashed into the South Tower. The reaction was strange. When the first plane crashed into the North Tower, it might be possible to excuse the behavior of the President's team because maybe nobody really knew what happened. However, by the time the second jet hit, everyone knew what was happening, so the fact that the President and his handlers did not respond immediately is certainly odd.
[FONT=arial,helvetica]
[SIZE=-2]Image courtesy Department of Defense/Master Sgt. Ken Hammond, U.S. Air Force[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]The Pentagon prior to the attack[/SIZE]
[/FONT] - The Pentagon could be hit by a big, lumbering passenger jet. On the face of it, that seems completely impossible. The Pentagon, after all, is the nerve center for the largest and most sophisticated military organization that the world has ever known. So it is reasonable to assume that there would be a defensive system in place, making the building invulnerable. Surely buildings like the Pentagon would be protected by surface-to-air missiles, wouldn't they? The attack on the Pentagon happened 58 minutes after the first plane crashed into the North Tower, which was plenty of time to scramble jets and protect Washington, D.C. even if there were no missiles on the ground.
- Not one of the four hijacked planes was shot down by fighters, even though fighter interception is fairly standard. This is also strange, especially in the case of the Pentagon. For example, when Payne Steward's Lear jet went off course in 1999, more than 10 planes intercepted it over the course of its flight, with the first interception happening within 20 minutes of flight controllers noticing a problem [ref]. So why was there an apparent lack of response to these four hijacked jets?
Next we'll look at how conspiracy theorists gather evidence and build a case for another explanation.
Building a Case
Here is the interesting thing about a conspiracy theory. The theory does have to start with some sort of discrepancy, but from that point the theorist has to explain everything that happened in a believable way. If the theorist cannot do that, then the theory is not going to hold up and no one will believe it. So he has to do a lot of work gathering evidence and looking for alternative explanations. Let's look at an example of how this might work. Assume that the conspiracy theorist looks at the fall of WTC 7. The theorist notes that the building did not partially collapse or crumple -- it fell exactly like a building would if the building were being demolished. So the theorist hypothesizes that the fall of WTC 7 was a pre-planned demolition rather than an actual, natural collapse of the building. The first thing that the theorist must do is to show that WTC 7 could credibly be conceived as a demolition. How might he make that determination? He might consider facts like these:
- No skyscraper has ever fallen because of a fire. WTC 7 was not hit by an airplane, and while it did have a fire burning when it collapsed, the fire was not "out of control," or widespread. Therefore, to have the building collapse is highly unusual.
- When looking at videos of the collapse, the building falls in a completely uniform way, just like a demolition. See videos on this page for three examples. If the fall of WTC 7 had been a natural collapse, it seems highly unusual for the collapse to be so uniform.
Difence.lk balanna....eke okkoma 4to tika thiyenawa......sakayak thiya ganna epa.....wattala ho watila ho dan plait 2ma nahne....eka gana hithala Sathutu wemu.........Ape kollo best
Last edited:
sachii said:ay rupawahini vitarada chanal ehekata tiyenne.. boru kararnna epa ochara
Aanduwe channel balanna epaya kalinma..
Kawuru hari kiyala thibuna 4ta Rupavahiniye wedasatahana thiyanwa kiyala..
Habai ITN eke nam comedy wedasatahanak wage ekak yanawa..
Api e kiyana katha walata hina wevie thamai inne..
Sirase ALA interview ekak wagei.
Machan Defence.lk eke photos dala tiyanawa... ewa balala ube sakaya ain karaganin..shehan1234 said:colombo walata wattuwa kiyana ekanam sakai guys....eke phototh na.....plait eke kallakwath na......aththatama colombo walata ekak wattalada......mama mehema ahanne news balala nemei....api internet eken dakka videos walin.....
Meka hariyata
SIRASA attack on SIRASA
wageyi.
SIRASA attack on SIRASA
wageyi.
9/11 attack and the doubts
THE DAY ITSELF - EVIDENCE OF COMPLICITY
1) AWOL Chain of Command
a. It is well documented that the officials topping the chain of command for response to a domestic attack - George W. Bush, Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Myers, Montague Winfield - all found reason to do something else during the actual attacks, other than assuming their duties as decision-makers.
b. Who was actually in charge? Dick Cheney, Richard Clarke, Norman Mineta and the 9/11 Commission directly conflict in their accounts of top-level response to the unfolding events, such that several (or all) of them must be lying. 2) Air Defense Failures
a. The US air defense system failed to follow standard procedures for responding to diverted passenger flights.
b. Timelines: The various responsible agencies - NORAD, FAA, Pentagon, USAF, as well as the 9/11 Commission - gave radically different explanations for the failure (in some cases upheld for years), such that several officials must have lied; but none were held accountable.
c. Was there an air defense standdown?
3) Pentagon Strike
How was it possible the Pentagon was hit 1 hour and 20 minutes after the attacks began? Why was there no response from Andrews Air Force Base, just 10 miles away and home to Air National Guard units charged with defending the skies above the nation''s capital? How did Hani Hanjour, a man who failed as a Cessna pilot on his first flight in a Boeing, execute a difficult aerobatic maneuver to strike the Pentagon? Why did the attack strike the just-renovated side, which was largely empty and opposite from the high command?
4) Wargames
a. US military and other authorities planned or actually rehearsed defensive response to all elements of the 9/11 scenario during the year prior to the attack - including multiple hijackings, suicide crashbombings, and a strike on the Pentagon.
b. The multiple military wargames planned long in advance and held on the morning of September 11th included scenarios of a domestic air crisis, a plane crashing into a government building, and a large-scale emergency in New York. If this was only an incredible series of coincidences, why did the official investigations avoid the issue? There is evidence that the wargames created confusion as to whether the unfolding events were "real world or exercise." Did wargames serve as the cover for air defense sabotage, and/or the execution of an "inside job"?
5) Flight 93
Did the Shanksville crash occur at 10:06 (according to a seismic report) or 10:03 (according to the 9/11 Commission)? Does the Commission wish to hide what happened in the last three minutes of the flight, and if so, why? Was Flight 93 shot down, as indicated by the scattering of debris over a trail of several miles?
THE DAY ITSELF - EVIDENCE OF COMPLICITY
1) AWOL Chain of Command
a. It is well documented that the officials topping the chain of command for response to a domestic attack - George W. Bush, Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Myers, Montague Winfield - all found reason to do something else during the actual attacks, other than assuming their duties as decision-makers.
b. Who was actually in charge? Dick Cheney, Richard Clarke, Norman Mineta and the 9/11 Commission directly conflict in their accounts of top-level response to the unfolding events, such that several (or all) of them must be lying. 2) Air Defense Failures
a. The US air defense system failed to follow standard procedures for responding to diverted passenger flights.
b. Timelines: The various responsible agencies - NORAD, FAA, Pentagon, USAF, as well as the 9/11 Commission - gave radically different explanations for the failure (in some cases upheld for years), such that several officials must have lied; but none were held accountable.
c. Was there an air defense standdown?
3) Pentagon Strike
How was it possible the Pentagon was hit 1 hour and 20 minutes after the attacks began? Why was there no response from Andrews Air Force Base, just 10 miles away and home to Air National Guard units charged with defending the skies above the nation''s capital? How did Hani Hanjour, a man who failed as a Cessna pilot on his first flight in a Boeing, execute a difficult aerobatic maneuver to strike the Pentagon? Why did the attack strike the just-renovated side, which was largely empty and opposite from the high command?
4) Wargames
a. US military and other authorities planned or actually rehearsed defensive response to all elements of the 9/11 scenario during the year prior to the attack - including multiple hijackings, suicide crashbombings, and a strike on the Pentagon.
b. The multiple military wargames planned long in advance and held on the morning of September 11th included scenarios of a domestic air crisis, a plane crashing into a government building, and a large-scale emergency in New York. If this was only an incredible series of coincidences, why did the official investigations avoid the issue? There is evidence that the wargames created confusion as to whether the unfolding events were "real world or exercise." Did wargames serve as the cover for air defense sabotage, and/or the execution of an "inside job"?
5) Flight 93
Did the Shanksville crash occur at 10:06 (according to a seismic report) or 10:03 (according to the 9/11 Commission)? Does the Commission wish to hide what happened in the last three minutes of the flight, and if so, why? Was Flight 93 shot down, as indicated by the scattering of debris over a trail of several miles?
The following images were taken during and after the fire at the Madrid Windsor Tower, which burned at temperatures of 800 celcius and for over 18 hours (AFP). The core of this building did not fail and the building remained standing.
Below are images of a government building in Caracas, Venezuela which burned for 17 hours in October 2004. This building is Venezuela's highest skyscraper and suffered the destruction of the top twenty of its fifty floors yet the building still did not collapse.
Yet, here are images of World Trade Centre 7, a 47 story steel framed building, which having suffered fires only on a few floors on September 11, 2001, collapsed symetrically at virtually free fall speed and neatly into its own footprint - achievable only using carefully placed explosives.
Please bear in mind the following facts;
- BUILDING 7 WAS NOT HIT BY AN AIRPLANE
- NO STEEL FRAMED HIGH RISE BUILDING HAS EVER COLLAPSED DUE TO FIRE.
So..er...maybe this can explain it (click image to view)
The term "pull" is used in the controlled demolition industry to refer to the bringing down of a building using explosives. This would certainly explain the various features of the collapse.
This kind of project would require weeks, at the very least, to plan and to place the charges in a manner that would result in the neat pile we can witness above. This specialist skill can only be carried out by a small number of controlled demolition companies and, all things considered, it is completely unreasonable to suggest that this is the work of Al-Qaeda alone.
One of the arguments that critics of the official account often face when trying to encourage others to research the alternative theories of the events of 9/11 is the suggestion that the conspiracy is just too large: it would require too many people involved to ensure that it remained a secret. This is not necessarily the case, primarily due to the compartmentalization of the various governmental departments, the military and intelligence. Those that are not privy to the real agenda, will merely continue to do their jobs in the belief they are doing what is right, whilst the key decision makers and propagandists will have been carefully placed in those positions in order to carry out the real agenda and help maintain the public myth.
In the case of the unprecedented, sudden collapse of World Trade Center Building 7, and whilst it so obviously implicates obvious involvement outside of Al-Qaeda, many people may still refuse to take their research any further due to the main question that this raises and the subsequent "can of worms" that is opened - for example, how would a group of people be able to place the large amount of explosives required for such a demolition weeks before the attacks and all whilst out of the sight of security?
So which company was responsible for the security of the World Trade Center complex leading up to 9/11?
The company was responsible for installing the “security-description plan” which was the layout of the electronic security system—at the World Trade Center. Another of Stratesec’s biggest contracts, between 1995 and 1998, was providing electronic security for Reagan National Airport and Dulles International Airport. Their work included maintaining the airfield access systems and the CCTV (closed circuit television) systems.
The building was also no ordinary building in terms of its occupants. At the time of its destruction, it exclusively housed government agencies and financial institutions. Amongst others, it contained offices of the IRS, U.S. Secret Service and the Securities and Exchange Commission and the CIA . Also, on the 23rd floor was the then-Mayor Giuliani's Office of Emergency Management and its emergency command center. This floor had received 15 million dollars worth of renovations, to include independent and secure air and water supplies and bullet and bomb resistant windows designed to withstand 200 MPH winds. This command centre, having been set up to deal with such an attack, was abandoned in favour of a different headquarters on the day of the attacks.
Building 7 fell suddenly at 5:20pm on September 11th, 2001 at near free fall speed and into a neat pile. NEVER IN HISTORY has this type of collapse been attributable to anything other than a controlled demolition. Numerous witnesses reported having heard large explosions before and during the collapse. The lease-owner of the building admitted to it having been "pulled".
Is it reasonable to ignore this unprecendented collapse because we cannot immediately answer the subsequent questions that this raises?
Should we merely disregard the admission of the building's demolition from its leaseholder, Larry Silverstein?
Are we to just accept the commission's decision not to interview the company responsible for security, especially in light of the fact that the board included the brother of the President George W Bush, who himself was one of those that benefitted most from the attacks?
But what does building 7 matter? Wasn't Osama seen admitting to the attacks in that videotape?
Ah, the videotape...(click image to view)
..anyone else smelling a rat yet?
Read More http://www.myspace.com/911truthpeterborough
Last edited:
Mata therenne na guy meke mokakda kiyala......Apu plait 2kata suicde plait lu....( Guwan hamuda madya prakashaka wind commander janaka nanayakkara live at 12 2009.02.21) katunayake eken C4 140kg ganak hoyagenalu......Colombo walata watuna ekath suicde nam eketh C4 genawane ara wagema....ehema plait ekak IR eke wadunama Ohoma Tiyenna Puluwanda????????????ane manda....mewa gana katha karama desha dohiyo weida danneth na?????????????
madawa_1 said:
Me threads walata dana reply dekkama apatath ehema thami..
Api nam kaagena innawa...
Hamoma ehema nahane.
Hamoma kohoma hari innath epaya..
Meka podu thanakne.
Iwasa gena inna.
Dawal Shoot karapu video monawath dekkada.
Ara 12weni thattuwe engine eka pennuweth nehe neda?
AtulaSiriwardane said:
Dawal Shoot karapu video monawath dekkada.
Ara 12weni thattuwe engine eka pennuweth nehe neda?
Me meeharakage as penenneth ne wage.
Aththak pennana mokowath moota penenne ne.
Pro LTTE ewa witharai penenne.
Elakiri eke inna kalakannima eka moo thamai.
Booruwo meke threadsma keeyak thiyanawada e pictures daala.
Thoge kate thiyena mha ekage araka peththakin thiyala balapan.
sriboysl said:
9/11 eke saka gena hoyana 9/11 truth.org kiyala sanvidhaanayak thiyanawa kiyala mama dekke eeye... E wunaata 9/11 eka dakina kotath mata saka hituna oka Bushgema wedak kiyala.. Oya building plane ekak weduna kiyala kada wetenna hetuwak nehe. Bushge mallith innawa ewata arakshaawa dunna security company eke. Den 70%k withara americansla hithanawalu bomba pupuruwala thamai eka karala thiyenne kiyala..
Thawa godak saka dewal thiyanawalu. Einuth ekak mata edaama hituna. Pentagon eke plane eka wedila thiyenne aluthen hadapu senaga nethi building ekakata.
Ahatama dekkath nopiligathyuthu dewal thiyenawa.... Bauddhayekge moolikama wenasa ekai.
Budu haamuduruwo kiyanne 'Budu haamuduruwo kiyapu deyak' kiyala kiwwath hithanne nethuwa, hoyanne nethuwa piliganna epa kiyala.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AtulaSiriwardane
9/11 truth?
- NO STEEL FRAMED HIGH RISE BUILDING HAS EVER COLLAPSED DUE TO FIRE.
The following images were taken during and after the fire at the Madrid Windsor Tower, which burned at temperatures of 800 celcius and for over 18 hours (AFP). The core of this building did not fail and the building remained standing.
Below are images of a government building in Caracas, Venezuela which burned for 17 hours in October 2004. This building is Venezuela's highest skyscraper and suffered the destruction of the top twenty of its fifty floors yet the building still did not collapse.
Yet, here are images of World Trade Centre 7, a 47 story steel framed building, which having suffered fires only on a few floors on September 11, 2001, collapsed symetrically at virtually free fall speed and neatly into its own footprint - achievable only using carefully placed explosives.
- NO STEEL FRAMED HIGH RISE BUILDING HAS EVER COLLAPSED DUE TO FIRE.
Is it reasonable to ignore this unprecendented collapse because we cannot immediately answer the subsequent questions that this raises?
Are we to just accept the commission's decision not to interview the company responsible for security, especially in light of the fact that the board included the brother of the President George W Bush, who himself was one of those that benefitted most from the attacks?
- NO STEEL FRAMED HIGH RISE BUILDING HAS EVER COLLAPSED DUE TO FIRE.
The following images were taken during and after the fire at the Madrid Windsor Tower, which burned at temperatures of 800 celcius and for over 18 hours (AFP). The core of this building did not fail and the building remained standing.
Below are images of a government building in Caracas, Venezuela which burned for 17 hours in October 2004. This building is Venezuela's highest skyscraper and suffered the destruction of the top twenty of its fifty floors yet the building still did not collapse.
Yet, here are images of World Trade Centre 7, a 47 story steel framed building, which having suffered fires only on a few floors on September 11, 2001, collapsed symetrically at virtually free fall speed and neatly into its own footprint - achievable only using carefully placed explosives.
- NO STEEL FRAMED HIGH RISE BUILDING HAS EVER COLLAPSED DUE TO FIRE.
Is it reasonable to ignore this unprecendented collapse because we cannot immediately answer the subsequent questions that this raises?
Are we to just accept the commission's decision not to interview the company responsible for security, especially in light of the fact that the board included the brother of the President George W Bush, who himself was one of those that benefitted most from the attacks?
__________________
sriboysl said:
machan oya baka pandithayo kiyana ewa gana ganna epa.. mokek oya athula kiyana eka?? pora hithan inne uu hena genius dial eka kiyala.
kaiya witharai..
