හරි.. එහෙනං ඔයා කියන විදිහට විසඳුම කවුද..?
01. සජිත්
02. අනුර
03. පල්ලෙවත්ත
04. නාගානන්ද
නොදන්න යකාට වඩා දන්න යකා හොඳයි කියලා පරණ කතාවක් තියෙනවා. මහින්ද රටට වැඩක් කරලා පෙන්නුවා. කොමිස් ගැහුවා වෙන්න ඇති. නමුත් රටට වැඩක් කළා. සිරා + රනිල් යහපාලනය රටට කිසිම දෙයක් කලේ නෑ. උන් හොරකන් කළා විතරයි.
Guys, we have seen pros and cons of both parties. Instead of being hardcore supporters of usual parties, let's come out of the box and see.
In 21st century, being a country which has larger literacy rate and somewhat technical knowledge among everybody in the country, we have not moved ahead as required.
That is the bitter truth.
Solution is not Ranil, Mahinda or above said two gentlemen.
Ranil and Mahinda has already shown their colors and everybody has seen it.
Doespecially anybody think why other two gentlemen trying to come to the power? Because they love the country and they wanna do better? I don't think so. Why can't take initial steps towards betterment of the country before participating the precidency? This is gonna be the next comedy.
It is in our hand.
Just look back and see have we made the right decision?
What is the point of making a person who does not know how to talk to a point, how to respect the one in front, who does not have a general knowledge at least, who has no patience, Mainly who does not know how to behave as a member of the parliament in our country?
There are about 21.44 M people in Sri Lanka.
There are 225 members in parliament.
They are supposed to represent people and serve the country.
That is why they are called public servants.
So one member of parliament represents 95,289 people approximately.
Be blunt, cam you say that this person think exactly in the same way so I think he is the best person to represent my self in the parliament?
Name a single name out of any party.
My point is that we need to be much more realistic when selecting so called public servants.