කුලේ ගැන ගැටලුවක්

LINDA_ADERSON_22

Well-known member
  • Dec 12, 2010
    23,293
    30,034
    113
    🇰🇪 🦁🐯🐺🐻🦌🐗🦊🦝🦒
    Ithin bn Hama paramparawema mul ekek innawane. Udin pahala une nahane.dan oya bandara nayaka un nawagamuwe dewale sattara kiyapu demala paramparawema ena unne. Dan oya suddo wage hitiyata.mama kiyanne e wagema Hama paramparawema oka goda dapu ekek innawa.
    Kohomath uba kiyapu eka hariyanne mul ekata witarayi etanin passe ena lamayi high-class widiyata hasirenne.
    ඒවා එහෙම තමයි. මුල් පුරුක් අවුල්. ඉදිරි පරම්පරාවල් මුහුවෙන පිරිස් අනුව හැසිරීම් වෙනස් වෙනවා. මගේ ළමයි කෙන්යා. උං ලංකාවේ ජීන්ස් වුනාට හැසිරීම කතාබහ ඔක්කොම කෙන්යන්. එතකොට උන්ගෙන් 100%ලංකාවේ හැසිරීම් බලාපොරොත්තු වෙන්න බෑ. උන්ගේ ළමයි ඊටත් වෙනස්වෙනවා ලංකා අභාෂයක් නැතිම නිසා.
    මම පෞද්ගලිකව විශ්වාසකරන දෙයක් තියෙනවා යම් යම් අවස්ථාවල කුළයේ ගති මතුවෙන්න පුලුවං.
     

    D_Mad

    Well-known member
  • Jun 11, 2013
    25,606
    42,097
    113
    Deniyaya
    කුලේ ඉස්සර වැඩ කරේ මාකට් එකේ එළවලු කඩේක. දැන් නම් මිනිහ වෙනම කඩයක් දාල. දැන් හොඳයි මිනිහට.
    කුලේ ඉස්සර බෝල දැම්ම දැන් නම් මොනා කොරනවද දන් නෑ
     

    THE-X

    Well-known member
  • Jul 20, 2020
    1,562
    4,059
    113
    Unkown
    x.com
    "ලොකු ගම් හෙවගේ" කියන්නෙ මොන කුලේද බ්න් :confused:
     
    Last edited:

    THE-X

    Well-known member
  • Jul 20, 2020
    1,562
    4,059
    113
    Unkown
    x.com
    "ලොකු ගම් හෙවගේ" කියන්නෙ මොන කුලේද බ්න් :confused:
    Screen Shot 2020-11-14 at 8.50.26 AM.png


    කරාව කියල පේජ් එකේ මෙහෙම තියනව, ඒ කියන්නෙ කරාවද?
    ලොකු කියල නම් කෑල්ලක් නෑ ඒත්. :confused::confused:
     

    sakuntha1996

    Well-known member
  • Jan 13, 2017
    11,382
    21,300
    113
    Oya karawa website eka aththada bn.
    Eke hatiyata un royal dynasty ekakne.
    Nathnam mun me hadagenada.
    Govigama rajawaru nadda?
     

    hasithayad

    Well-known member
  • Sep 28, 2011
    30,793
    1
    45,000
    113
    සිංහලු, කුල ගැන අහන්න ඕන දෙමලුන්ගෙන්. උන්නං අදටත් බොන්න වතුර එකක්වත් දෙන්නෑ අඩුකුළේ එකෙක්ට.
    දෙමලුන්ට අනුව සිංහලු කියන්නෙ උසස්ම කුලේ නේද?
     

    hancok

    Well-known member
  • Aug 16, 2008
    36,596
    19,052
    113
    පිළි-ඇඳි-දොළ
    1605330459625.png


    CASTE AND CLASS.

    C O N T E N T S .
    1. THE PEERAGE OF ENGLAND, SCOTLAND AND IRELAND.
    2. THE ARISTOCRACY, OF THE KINGDOM OP KANDY.
    THE ARISTOCRACY OF THE MARITIME PROVINCES.
    4, THE BURGHERS.
    5. APPOINTMENT OF MUDALYABS, ETC.

    Printed at the "Industrial Press,"
    BY
    A. H. ADAMS, PRINTER,
    y«. $6, FOURTH CROSS STREET, RETT AH.
    1 8 8 7 .
    PRICE ONE RUPEE
    CASTE AND CLASS.
    OF C E Y L O N.
    FIAT JUSTITIA RUAT CJELUM.
    & 6asa» &w w v


    We shall now consider whether there is or there is not a Singhalese
    aristocracy in Ceylon. Our contention is that there had been an aristocracy
    in the Kandyan Kingdom, but since the cession of that Kingdom to the
    English, that aristocracy has lost its wealth-and its pTestigej and has degenerated
    into the condition in which we heboid it now. Its degeneration, is not
    to be attributed, as some might,suppose, to itself, but to the predominance of
    an enlightened Government-which, until recently, has not practically recognized
    the existence of any aristocracy. Its degeneration may also ~be ascribed
    to its isolation from the chief Seat of the Government. We shall offer na
    further- observations on the Kandyan aristocracy. We mnst now invite the
    attention ^ o f our readers to, the pretended aristocracy of the Maritime
    Provinces,
    4
    We are inclined to believe that a Native aristocracy in the Maritime
    Provinces never existed. It must be conceded that it is always difficult,
    and often impossible, to prove a negative, to prove that a certain thing did
    not exist or did not occur. If such an aristocracy ever existed, history or
    tradition should establish the fact» We defy proof of the past existence
    of an aristocracy in the Maritime Provinces. It is to be regretted
    that most of those who pretend to belong to the aristocracy have scarcely
    any idea of what could be the signification of the word. Perhaps, they
    suppose that a Mudalyar whose great-grand-father had been a Mudalyar is
    an aristocrat; or, perhaps, they suppose that aristocracy iB a word which
    admits of considerable latitude of signification t The pretensions of this
    self-constituted aristocracy are rather startling and greatly amusing. It
    pretends to have occupied for several centuries the highest position in the
    Island, its'Buler alone excepted. We are not aware that any reliable proof
    exists, or can be adduced, to establish itB pretensions. . We do not hesitate
    to declare openly that the ancientness or antiquity of the aristocracy ( ? )
    of the Maritime Provinces is problematical, if not utterly mythical. Our
    own conception of an aristocracy is far different from that ludicrous interpretation
    put upon the word by most of the " first class gentleman " of the
    day. To enable our readers to form a just estimate of the aristocracy of
    the Maritime Provinces, we may as well say that our own idea of it is this,—
    that this aristocracy IB composed of the descendants of the servants of the
    late Dutch Government and servants of the Dutch—some of Tamil extraction,
    some of Singhalese extraction, some possibly of both Singhalese and Tamil
    parents—whose position under the Dutch Government was analogous to that
    of a Court Interpreter or a Mudalyar of a Corle or Mohandiram, or Arachy
    of the present day. How the descendants of the Natives who had only about
    a century ago served the Dutch Government as Mudalyars, Mohandirams and
    Arachies, can claim to form an aristocracy in the present age, we cannot
    conceive. But Sir Arthur Gordon, if we may Judge from the phenomena
    of recent years, verily believes in the existence of an Aristocracy in the Maritime
    Provinces and its antiquity. We are afraid that Sir Arthur's prejudices
    are now too strong and too deeply rooted to admit of the possibility of our
    disabusing his mind o f such a hallucination. We should not be surprised at
    the partiality of Sir Arthur to a native aristocracy, i f a native aristocracy
    really existed. Nor, indeed, would we complain of such partiality so long as
    we are aware that Sir Arthur himself belongs to the aristocracy of Great
    Britain. But our contention ie that no native aristocracy had ever existed,
    or can exist, in the Maritime Provinces. That institution which pretends to
    be aristocratical is an excrescence of modern date ; nay, coeval only with
    {Sb administration of Sir Arthur Gordon. We confidently challenge th»