ටයි බීම් උදවූවක්..

[dhanuconfi]

මේ ක්‍රමය හරිද ??
ටයිබීම් එක උඩ අතට නේද එන්න ඕන ???

මේක හැටියට පළල වැඩියි උස අඩුයි ඒක වැරදියි නේද?

 

[your_love]

Ruble foundation ekak uda neda beam eka yanne? So no issue. Btw purudu wenna gewal hadana bass kenek nemei neda bas? Ehenan awlak na.

 

[netnet]

https://m.facebook.com/groups/thedreamhome/?ref=bookmarks

me page eke dapan ona deyak dsnaganna puluwan

 

[asylum]

bump.

 

[jayadush]

yes
It is not correct.
normaly in a tie beam or any other concrete beam " beam depth" is the governing factor
If the beam depth is more, it can go for a larger span and also the beam can withstand a higher load.
Therefore unless a special case like "band beam" or slab beam( normaly construct at upper floor levels),according to the normal practise of structural design in selecting a sutable beam size - depth to be equal or larger than the width.
But another purpose of a tie beam is to connect all column footings to minimize the differential settlement of column foundations.
Also I cannot understand why the contractor or Bass fixed the beam reinforcement in wrong direction?
Anyway, if this is a 2 to 3 storied house/building & the soil condition at the site is not much adverse ( according to the photograps, Peaty soil or clayey soil with high water table not visible at the site ) and if the spacing of the column footings are not larger than 18 feet(say) ,this is not a very big issue.But the best practise is to untie all the reinforcement and refix it to a correct manner. May be the "bass" made a mistake by completing the concrete pad or rubble work at a higher elevation and now to cover up that mistake & also to tally with the correct Finished Floor Level(FFL), he may be fixed the tie beam reinforcement in this way ??

 

[Kolama]

Bumpation

 

[dhanuconfi]

yes
It is not correct.
normaly in a tie beam or any other concrete beam " beam depth" is the governing factor
If the beam depth is more, it can go for a larger span and also the beam can withstand a higher load.
Therefore unless a special case like "band beam" or slab beam( normaly construct at upper floor levels),according to the normal practise of structural design in selecting a sutable beam size - depth to be equal or larger than the width.
But another purpose of a tie beam is to connect all column footings to minimize the differential settlement of column foundations.
Also I cannot understand why the contractor or Bass fixed the beam reinforcement in wrong direction?
Anyway, if this is a 2 to 3 storied house/building & the soil condition at the site is not much adverse ( according to the photograps, Peaty soil or clayey soil with high water table not visible at the site ) and if the spacing of the column footings are not larger than 18 feet(say) ,this is not a very big issue.But the best practise is to untie all the reinforcement and refix it to a correct manner. May be the "bass" made a mistake by completing the concrete pad or rubble work at a higher elevation and now to cover up that mistake & also to tally with the correct Finished Floor Level(FFL), he may be fixed the tie beam reinforcement in this way ??

Thank you...

Isn't it should connect tie beam and column together?
There is a space between them.