3.5 Mil වලට ගන්න පුලුවන් හොඳ කාර් එකක්

hrm

Well-known member
  • Mar 19, 2008
    6,004
    3,460
    113
    Battaramulla, Sri Lanka
    LOL bottom line is don't ask for car advises in Elakiri. Everyone comes with their opinions , preferences and crap. Just go with your heart, check the car yourself and buy a sensible vehicle for your needs. End of the day it's only you going to throw cash on it.

    What Marquis said is true. I have been to a car sale yesterday and there were some couple of sparkling Lacers CSs but no one bothered. Many of the buyers I saw are circling around a hacked 121. Unfortunately that's Sri Lanka.
     
    Last edited:

    marQuis

    Member
    Dec 12, 2009
    3,820
    312
    0
    Infinite Universe :)
    He is telling that the brandnew imported vehicles are better than the reconditioned one.

    If you really think about it, he has some good points. and all the faults he mentioned are true.

    earlier when the auto vehicles came out it's a total different system than the manual and people put their attention to it. but when the cvts came along people thought it's just another auto box we don't have worry about.
    now that's where most of the cvts screwed up in the first place.

    so as he mentioned going for a much newer c auto rather than an old cvt is a very good choice.
     

    marQuis

    Member
    Dec 12, 2009
    3,820
    312
    0
    Infinite Universe :)
    LOL bottom line is don't ask for car advises in Elakiri. Everyone comes with their opinions , preferences and crap. Just go with your heart, check the car yourself and buy a sensible vehicle for your needs. End of the day it's only you going to throw cash on it.

    Exactly,

    Collect all the information, different views and just do what the hrm said. In the end you're the one who gonna use it. not us.



    What Marquis said is true. I have been to a car sale yesterday and there were some couple of sparkling Lacers CSs but no one bothered. Many of the buyers I saw are circling around a hacked 121. Unfortunately that's Sri Lanka.

    Sad truth
     

    Hyaenidae

    Well-known member
  • Apr 8, 2015
    53,044
    2
    54,828
    113
    couple of sparkling Lacers CSs but no one bothered. Many of the buyers I saw are circling around a hacked 121. Unfortunately that's Sri Lanka.

    Well fortunate for people who care about enjoying the drive rather than the resale value :yes:
     

    PUKARIS

    Active member
  • Dec 12, 2016
    723
    78
    28
    If you really think about it, he has some good points. and all the faults he mentioned are true.

    earlier when the auto vehicles came out it's a total different system than the manual and people put their attention to it. but when the cvts came along people thought it's just another auto box we don't have worry about.
    now that's where most of the cvts screwed up in the first place.

    so as he mentioned going for a much newer c auto rather than an old cvt is a very good choice.


    This might be true for a specific model in the past. But it does not mean all the CVTs are bad. If OP can't find a good belta, then it's ok to go with a yaris. I am not recommending yaris solely because people are frustrated with it's fuel economy and eventually it will bother anyone. But still it does 10-12 kmpl.

    It seems you are going to choose c. auto over the old CVT. how about newer c auto vs newer CVT? are you going to choose newer c auto?:rofl:
     

    PUKARIS

    Active member
  • Dec 12, 2016
    723
    78
    28
    You know automotive threads on Elakiri, you know the car enthusiasts here, ask anyone - open a thread if you want - and ask which transmission is the most reliable one to this date, conventional auto or CVT.

    Most of the car enthusiasts here are under the age of 35 so that "older peoples' reluctance" theory isn't applicable:rolleyes:

    car enthusiasts means all of them are on the subject for atleast 10 years, that means it's the best era in SL for the manual transmission. So when a one used to drive a manual with the macho attitude they will see auto as the women's choice. So going to talk with a enthusiast about manual vs auto is like offering a bike racer a scooter. they never see the easiness and flexibility offered by the newer vehicle. As you are saying auto does not connect the driver to the car but instead it will does the job of transportation.;)
     

    marQuis

    Member
    Dec 12, 2009
    3,820
    312
    0
    Infinite Universe :)
    This might be true for a specific model in the past. But it does not mean all the CVTs are bad. If OP can't find a good belta, then it's ok to go with a yaris. I am not recommending yaris solely because people are frustrated with it's fuel economy and eventually it will bother anyone. But still it does 10-12 kmpl.

    It seems you are going to choose c. auto over the old CVT. how about newer c auto vs newer CVT? are you going to choose newer c auto?:rofl:

    nope.
    You know I'm a victim of a 2007 made CVT. but still I'll go for a newer CVT :yes:
     

    PUKARIS

    Active member
  • Dec 12, 2016
    723
    78
    28
    For the love of... :angry:
    I'm trying to make you understand why the Yaris is reliable than the Belta!

    You love to discuss the Makka while the discussion is on the Balla don't you? Hybrids, EVs, Carbon emissions and now JDMs :dull:

    OK!:rofl: I am not saying Belta is always reliable than Yaris. some one can find a poorly maintained belta and anyone can agree that it might not be reliable as the c. auto yaris. But I am saying if some one can find a Belta with a proper history of maintenance records, going for that belta is not a bad choice. It's better than buying a yaris.
     

    Vhp6385

    Well-known member
  • Nov 5, 2016
    2,123
    328
    83
    OK!:rofl: I am not saying Belta is always reliable than Yaris. some one can find a poorly maintained belta and anyone can agree that it might not be reliable as the c. auto yaris. But I am saying if some one can find a Belta with a proper history of maintenance records, going for that belta is not a bad choice. It's better than buying a yaris.

    LMAO hyaneda leave this one alone dude:yes::sorry:
     

    PUKARIS

    Active member
  • Dec 12, 2016
    723
    78
    28
    Well fortunate for people who care about enjoying the drive rather than the resale value :yes:

    Manual transmission might have some higher endurance capacity for misuse or at extreme driving conditions. But these days those old manual vehicles are going obsolete day by day. Those old manual transmissions are going to be choice of only old people's or by enthusiast, as you pointed out.
    Similar fate will be applied to conventional auto too. Some manufactures are trying to renovate it, but sadly majority are shifting to CVTs.
     

    Hyaenidae

    Well-known member
  • Apr 8, 2015
    53,044
    2
    54,828
    113
    OK!:rofl: I am not saying Belta is always reliable than Yaris. some one can find a poorly maintained belta and anyone can agree that it might not be reliable as the c. auto yaris. But I am saying if some one can find a Belta with a proper history of maintenance records, going for that belta is not a bad choice. It's better than buying a yaris.


    6XG7zJl.png



    LMAO hyaneda leave this one alone dude:yes::sorry:

    IKR? :yes::yes::yes:
     
    Last edited:

    marQuis

    Member
    Dec 12, 2009
    3,820
    312
    0
    Infinite Universe :)
    ඔන්න වෙන්න යන දේ කියන්නම්.

    මේකේ ඉන්න රිච් ෆකර්ස්ල දැන් කියවයි උන්ට තියෙන කාර් ගැන, උන් යන එන තැන් ගැන. බ්ලාහ් බ්ලාහ්. වැටෙන හැම ත්‍රෙඩ් එකකම අන්තිමේ ත්‍රෙඩ් එක පැත්තක කොහෙද යන ෆකයනිගේ පම්පෝරිය තමයි ඉතිරිවෙන්නේ.


    :lol::lol::lol::rofl::rofl:





    සුදු මහත්තයා;22055586 said:
    3.5 Mil වලට ගන්න පුලුවන් හොඳ second hand කාර් එකක් කියන්නකො. Fuel Economy එක සාමාන්‍ය එකක් උනාම ඇති. ගොඩක්ම පරණ නැති ඒ වගේම parts හොයන්න ලේසි ලෙඩ අඩු වාහනයක් උනානම් හොඳයි. :eek::eek::eek::eek:

    Sedan එකක් වෙන්නත් ඕන.


    මට සමාවෙයන් බන්.

    උඹ ගියර් බොක්ස් එකක් ගත්තද? :D
     

    Hyaenidae

    Well-known member
  • Apr 8, 2015
    53,044
    2
    54,828
    113
    සුදු මහත්තයා;22055586 said:
    3.5 Mil වලට ගන්න පුලුවන් හොඳ second hand කාර් එකක් කියන්නකො. Fuel Economy එක සාමාන්‍ය එකක් උනාම ඇති. ගොඩක්ම පරණ නැති ඒ වගේම parts හොයන්න ලේසි ලෙඩ අඩු වාහනයක් උනානම් හොඳයි. :eek::eek::eek::eek:

    Sedan එකක් වෙන්නත් ඕන.



    මට සමාවෙයන් බන්.

    උඹ ගියර් බොක්ස් එකක් ගත්තද? :D

    Fuel Economy එක සාමාන්‍ය එකක් උනාම ඇති. - Conventional Auto
    ගොඩක්ම පරණ නැති - OP would be able to find a newer Conventional auto vehicle for the asking price of an old CVT one (i.e. Newer Yaris)

    parts හොයන්න ලේසි ලෙඩ අඩු - Conventional auto!

    See, any conventional auto vehicle in this price range fits perfectly for OP's requirement, that's what I was trying to say from the beginning! :yes:


    So my recommendations based on OP's requirements would be:

    #1 : Corolla 141 2008+

    Toyota Yaris (2008-2010)
    Mitsubishi Lancer CS series (2010 - 2012) - bit hard to find one though
    N16/N17 (2010+)

    Bit old
    --------
    Allion 240 (2003 - 2005)
    121 (2004+)

    :yes:
     
    Last edited:

    PUKARIS

    Active member
  • Dec 12, 2016
    723
    78
    28

    Fuel Economy එක සාමාන්‍ය එකක් උනාම ඇති. - Conventional Auto
    ගොඩක්ම පරණ නැති - OP would be able to find a newer Conventional auto vehicle for the asking price of an old CVT one (i.e. Newer Yaris)

    parts හොයන්න ලේසි ලෙඩ අඩු - Conventional auto!

    See, any conventional auto vehicle in this price range fits perfectly for OP's requirement, that's what I was trying to say from the beginning! :yes:


    So my recommendations based on OP's requirements would be:

    #1 : Corolla 141 2008+

    Toyota Yaris (2008-2010)
    Mitsubishi Lancer CS series (2010 - 2012) - bit hard to find one though
    N16/N17 (2010+)

    Bit old
    --------
    Allion 240 (2003 - 2005)
    121 (2004+)

    :yes:

    Machan don't recommend 141:lol:, only few people can afford that much of fuel cost.
     

    Hyaenidae

    Well-known member
  • Apr 8, 2015
    53,044
    2
    54,828
    113
    Machan don't recommend 141:lol:, only few people can afford that much of fuel cost.

    Come on, be serious. It does 9-10 average in cmb traffic, 12-14 average (up to 15-16 depending on driving conditions) outstation.

    It's very reasonable FE for a car this size with a 1600CC engine.
     

    marQuis

    Member
    Dec 12, 2009
    3,820
    312
    0
    Infinite Universe :)


    So my recommendations based on OP's requirements would be:

    #1 : Corolla 141 2008+

    Toyota Yaris (2008-2010)
    Mitsubishi Lancer CS series (2010 - 2012) - bit hard to find one though
    N16/N17 (2010+)

    Bit old
    --------
    Allion 240 (2003 - 2005)
    121 (2004+)

    :yes:


    Nissan Tiida 2008/2010





    Machan don't recommend 141:lol:, only few people can afford that much of fuel cost.

    It's not that bad bro plus he says normal fe would be fine so let him decide