What is Buddhism ?

sri_lion

Member
Sep 14, 2006
12,908
102
0
Kuala Lumpur
kosandpol said:
Body is thirsty --> drink what ever available drinkable liquid
no karma in this situation right ?

YES! Unless you see an alive ant in your drink but gulp it down anyway..

kosandpol said:
If this is correct, what happens if the available liquid happens to be alcohol ?

But you should be absolutely sure that there's no other means of getting anything else other than Alcohol to drink.. well.. you cannot lie to yourself.. "Chethana" always precede things!
 

kosandpol

Well-known member
  • Jun 10, 2008
    45,329
    1,492
    113
    sri_lion said:
    "Chethana" always precede things!
    This brings be to a question I always had.

    Now it is said that by doing good deeds ("kusal") one makes one's this life and next a better one.
    So what is the "Chethana" here ? "I want to do good deeds so that I'll have a better life" ?
    that always seem selfish to me, thus "klesha" and destructive karma.

    What have I got mixed up here ?
     
    Aug 19, 2008
    11,653
    167
    0
    Sri Lanka
    kosandpol said:
    thirsty, because the body needs liquids -- natural need.

    thirsty, because you crave for alcohol -- greed (thanha).

    That is the difference.

    I would like to add a word about alcohol.
    I think Buddha didn't mean
    avoiding Alcohol absolutely.
    In Mangala Sutta he says
    Majjapanacha sangnamo.
    Sanyamayen Madya paanaya
    Taking alcohol with discipline.

    Surameraya Majjapamadatthana veramani
    means
    Madyayen pramadayata peminiemen valakimi
    Avoiding Alchol to the level of being delayed

    Prmadaya
    means
    missing the awareness of this moment
    which is Samma Sati.

    Appamada is
    practicing Samma Sati.
    It is the way to be alive.
    One who is not aware of himself is a corpse.
    Appamado amatha padan- pamado machchuno padan.


     

    sri_lion

    Member
    Sep 14, 2006
    12,908
    102
    0
    Kuala Lumpur
    kosandpol said:
    This brings be to a question I always had.

    Now it is said that by doing good deeds ("kusal") one makes one's this life and next a better one.
    So what is the "Chethana" here ? "I want to do good deeds so that I'll have a better life" ?
    that always seem selfish to me, thus "klesha" and destructive karma.

    What have I got mixed up here ?

    Yeah I understand your question.. I think what you are asking is, if I always do "good things" with the intention of getting a good life wont that be accounted for "greed", right?

    But the issue here is according to Buddhism the ULTIMATE GOAL is NOT a good life.. ultimate goal is to break away from it!

    So again here comes "Chethana", if you do good deeds with the intention of living a good life and ultimately use that to achieve Nirvana, that cannot be accounted for greed, because GREED is not the motivation here.. its getting rid of the cycle!

    But if you do good deeds saying, if I do this in the next life time I'll be damn rich!

    NOW THAT'S GREED, and that's what most people today unfortunately expects too! :lol:
     
    Aug 19, 2008
    11,653
    167
    0
    Sri Lanka
    kosandpol said:
    This brings be to a question I always had.

    Now it is said that by doing good deeds ("kusal") one makes one's this life and next a better one.
    So what is the "Chethana" here ? "I want to do good deeds so that I'll have a better life" ?
    that always seem selfish to me, thus "klesha" and destructive karma.

    What have I got mixed up here ?

    Good Karma is useful but also a burden
    like money and wealth.
    Raga and dwesha both are impurities
    defilements in mind.

    Here two Chetnas are involved.
    One when he thinks about future
    and other is what he has when he actually does it.
    If one has lobha - in one instance
    if the mind is pleasant
    result is pleasant.
    if the mind is unpleasant
    result is unpleasant.
    Read the first two verses in Dhammapada.

    If Upadana is pleasant
    bhava is pleasant.
    If Upadana is unpleasant
    bhava is unpleasant.

    Buddha's principles are scientific.
    Lack of our scientific ability
    makes us fail to recognize them.
    That is why west
    is grabbing Buddha's Dhamma
    and we neglect.
    We are losing Sharddha and Buddhi both
    becoming slaves of west everyday.




     
    Aug 19, 2008
    11,653
    167
    0
    Sri Lanka
    kosandpol said:
    This brings be to a question I always had.

    Now it is said that by doing good deeds ("kusal") one makes one's this life and next a better one.
    So what is the "Chethana" here ? "I want to do good deeds so that I'll have a better life" ?
    that always seem selfish to me, thus "klesha" and destructive karma.

    What have I got mixed up here ?

    If one lives a selfish life
    living according to Buddha's Dhamma
    is the best way to live.
     
    Aug 19, 2008
    11,653
    167
    0
    Sri Lanka
    kosandpol said:
    Can you elaborate please ?
    What are the steps in the 8 fold path ?
    What else needs to be fulfilled for Samma Sathi to take place ?


    Samma sati

    Being aware of Mind and Body
    -in and out-
    -without reacting-
    -in relation to everything in perception-

    Kayanupassana
    Vedananupassana
    Chitthanupassana
    Dhammanupassana.

    Kaya
    Body

    Vedana
    Changing in body

    Chittha
    Mind

    Dhamma
    Changing in Mind
    ____________________​
     

    kosandpol

    Well-known member
  • Jun 10, 2008
    45,329
    1,492
    113
    sri_lion said:
    Yeah I understand your question.. I think what you are asking is, if I always do "good things" with the intention of getting a good life wont that be accounted for "greed", right?

    But the issue here is according to Buddhism the ULTIMATE GOAL is NOT a good life.. ultimate goal is to break away from it!

    So again here comes "Chethana", if you do good deeds with the intention of living a good life and ultimately use that to achieve Nirvana, that cannot be accounted for greed, because GREED is not the motivation here.. its getting rid of the cycle!
    but what is considered as "good life" here ?
    If it means comfortable life, then the intention is again greed isnt it ?

    But if you do good deeds saying, if I do this in the next life time I'll be damn rich!

    NOW THAT'S GREED, and that's what most people today unfortunately expects too! :lol:
    and this is what is being told to do as well by the monks... :baffled:
    this is a mess isnt it ?
     
    Aug 19, 2008
    11,653
    167
    0
    Sri Lanka
    kosandpol said:
    but what is considered as "good life" here ?
    If it means comfortable life, then the intention is again greed isnt it ?


    and this is what is being told to do as well by the monks... :baffled:
    this is a mess isnt it ?

    The most trustworthy way
    to Understand Buddha's Dhamma
    is to take it directly from sutta
    and practicing them.

    Intellectualizing does not help much....
    especially for the most valuable part, Satipatthana.
    It helps to bring some one to actual experience.
    It is like carrying the boat,
    sometimes with lot of respect
    without using it to cross the river.
    Then it is not a boat.

    It can be practiced referring to one's own mind and body.
    Accepting principles just because they are logical
    is against Buddha.

    One can go astray merrily
    and it will be difficult to start practice.
    When one practices
    Imaginations can disturb the actual experience.

    If not practiced
    it is not Buddha's teaching...
    Just glorified gossip only.
     
    Aug 19, 2008
    11,653
    167
    0
    Sri Lanka
    AtulaSiriwardane said:
    Good Karma is useful but also a burden
    like money and wealth.
    Raga and dwesha both are impurities
    defilements in mind.

    Here two Chetnas are involved.
    One when he thinks about future
    and other is what he has when he actually does it.
    If one has lobha - in one instance
    if the mind is pleasant
    result is pleasant.
    if the mind is unpleasant
    result is unpleasant.
    Read the first two verses in Dhammapada.

    If Upadana is pleasant
    bhava is pleasant.
    If Upadana is unpleasant
    bhava is unpleasant.

    Buddha's principles are scientific.
    Lack of our scientific ability
    makes us fail to recognize them.
    That is why west
    is grabbing Buddha's Dhamma
    and we neglect.
    We are losing Sharddha and Buddhi both
    becoming slaves of west everyday.




    Good karma can give fruits
    in a time which is utterly unnecessary.
    One may inherit a great wealth
    on his death bed.
    Good karma gave fruit
    but he can't use it.

    Nature does not favor any.
    Buddha paid for 11 bad karmas
    after he was enlightened.
    We say good and bad karmas.
    For nature both are karmas.
    Results of good karmas
    bring pleasant results.
    Results of bad karmas
    bring pleasant results.
    Nature does not support
    who does good karmas
    more than one deserves.
    Nature does not punish
    who does bad karmas
    more than one deserves.


     
    Aug 19, 2008
    11,653
    167
    0
    Sri Lanka
    kosandpol said:
    and this is what is being told to do as well by the monks... :baffled:
    this is a mess isnt it ?

    Monks make it a mess,
    consciously or unconsciously
    just like politicians.
    When the water is troubled
    fishing is easy.

    Most of the monks don't practice
    and don't allow others to practice also.
    A majority does not know what it is.
    There are some monks
    who really practice.
    but very few.

    Once I met a monk
    at a vipassana center
    who taught Buddha's teaching
    in Cathelic Priests Trainning college
    near Kandy.
    He was talking to me after the Vipassana course.
    He told me,
    "I became a monk when I was 9 years old,
    now I am 45 years old.
    Since now I was content.
    Now I feel that
    I have wasted all these 36 years
    without practicing.'
    If he was taught
    Vipassana when he became a monk
    how much he could have developed.
     

    sri_lion

    Member
    Sep 14, 2006
    12,908
    102
    0
    Kuala Lumpur
    kosandpol said:
    but what is considered as "good life" here ?
    If it means comfortable life, then the intention is again greed isnt it ?

    "Good Life" in Buddhism doesn't really mean a luxurious life, if you understand the long term goal a good life is only to sustain your physical shape while your mentality transform in accordance with the final goal.

    Because not every person is born with the same level of understanding or intelligence, its like a journey from A to B the start and the end is the same but your understanding of the Dhamma makes the difference of how fast you'll get there, if you commit yourself and naturally understands it better than others, you are as good as riding a JET towards your goal...

    So yes, if you does all the good with only the intention of pleasing your "panchendriya" then that's greed!

    kosandpol said:
    and this is what is being told to do as well by the monks... :baffled:
    this is a mess isnt it ?

    Unfortunately you are right!

    Majority of the monks today are obsessed with money, themselves and who has the biggest Temple! :rolleyes:
     
    Aug 19, 2008
    11,653
    167
    0
    Sri Lanka
    sri_lion said:
    your understanding of the Dhamma makes the difference of how fast you'll get there, if you commit yourself and naturally understands it better than others, you are as good as riding a JET towards your goal...

    :rolleyes:
    ?
    WHAT
    should be understood?
    How
    it should be understood?
    What happens
    when we understand?

    Please describe
    according to
    your experience.

    What part Klesha plays in this understanding
    and final liberation.
     
    Last edited:

    sri_lion

    Member
    Sep 14, 2006
    12,908
    102
    0
    Kuala Lumpur
    AtulaSiriwardane said:
    WHAT
    should be understood?

    According to my experience? :lol: Well I'm not a Rahath so I'll explain it what as it should be!

    The main questions to be answered, which already discussed in this thread is..

    1. Identify what is suffering

    2. identify what cause suffering

    3. Identify what is the procedure to end the suffering

    4. Walk the path

    Which of we all know is the foundation of Buddhism also known as Four Noble Truth.. That is, what should be understood in a nutshell.

    AtulaSiriwardane said:
    How
    it should be understood?

    Follow the 8 fold path..

    1. Samma-Ditti - Right View

    2. Samma-Sankappa - Right Thought

    3. Samma-Vaca - Right Words

    4. Samma-Kammanta - Right Action

    5. Samma-Ajiva - Right Livelihood

    6. Samma-Vayama — Right Effort

    7. Samma-Sati - Right Awareness

    8. Samma-Samadhi - Right Consciousness

    AtulaSiriwardane said:
    What happens
    when we understand?

    According to my experience.. I cannot give an answer because I'm long way off from this.. :lol:

    But it suppose to make you realize the four noble truths and now probably it all will make sense like a pieces of a puzzle falling into the correct places!

    Which now you have a clear picture of the 12 Nidhanas, the origins of suffering.

    AtulaSiriwardane said:
    What part Klesha plays in this understanding
    and final liberation.

    What do you mean by Final Liberation? Arahat stage?

    It is said in Alagaddupama Sutra

    "The Dhamma thus well-proclaimed by me is clear, open, evident, stripped of rags. In the Dhamma thus well-proclaimed by me — clear, open, evident, stripped of rags — there is for those monks who are arahants — whose mental effluents are ended, who have reached fulfillment, done the task, laid down the burden, attained the true goal, totally destroyed the fetter of becoming, and who are released through right gnosis — no (future) cycle for manifestation. This is how the Dhamma well-proclaimed by me is clear, open, evident, stripped of rags."

    So from the 10 fetters..

    1. sakkya-diṭṭi - Self

    2. vichikichcha - Doubt

    3. sīlabbata-paramasa - Attachment

    4. kamacchanda - Desire

    5. vyapaada - Ill will

    6. ruparago - Craving for material things

    7. aruparago - Craving for immaterial things

    8. maana - Arrogance

    9. uddhacca - Relenlesnes

    10. avijja - Ignorance

    If you are already Anagami which means you already archived the top 5, so for the final push it is the next 5 that one should eradicate.. then becomes Arahat!
     
    Aug 19, 2008
    11,653
    167
    0
    Sri Lanka
    sri_lion said:
    According to my experience? :lol: Well I'm not a Rahath so I'll explain it what as it should be!

    The main questions to be answered, which already discussed in this thread is..

    1. Identify what is suffering

    2. identify what cause suffering

    3. Identify what is the procedure to end the suffering

    4. Walk the path

    Which of we all know is the foundation of Buddhism also known as Four Noble Truth.. That is, what should be understood in a nutshell.


    You said
    "your understanding of the Dhamma makes the difference"
    Walk the path seem to mean something beyond understanding.
    How to walk the path?




    Follow the 8 fold path..

    1. Samma-Ditti - Right View

    2. Samma-Sankappa - Right Thought

    3. Samma-Vaca - Right Words

    4. Samma-Kammanta - Right Action

    5. Samma-Ajiva - Right Livelihood

    6. Samma-Vayama — Right Effort

    7. Samma-Sati - Right Awareness

    8. Samma-Samadhi - Right Consciousness


    You said
    "your understanding of the Dhamma makes the difference"
    Understanding eight fold path
    is not seem to be enough it seems.

    I will leave other 6.
    Can you explain these two in detail.

    7. Samma-Sati - Right Awareness
    8. Samma-Samadhi - Right Consciousness
     

    ChuttaFX

    Member
    Nov 15, 2008
    4,587
    12
    0
    This is how Assaji Smanera introduced Buddhism to Upathissa Pririwaji (who became Sariyuth Rahathn Wahanse)

    every effect has a cause and this cause is the reason for the effect to be.
    suffering has a cause (as it's a effect) and this cause is the reason for suffering to be.
    This means that if there is no cause, there is no effect. So that, if there is no cause for suffering, there is no suffering. Notice that this explains about four noble truth.

    Four noble truth

    1. Suffering -
    First we should know what suffering is. Suffering is what we experience. If something that we don't like, happens we suffers. If something that we like, doesn't happen, we suffers.

    2. Understanding why suffering effects -
    Suffering is what what we experience / The effect / The result of something. The way of understanding why suffering effects is called Patichcha Samuppadaya. (Identifying the main cause(s) by going step-by-step backward with causes & effects). Please someone explain it well as I can't remember it all. So explaining Patichcha Samuppadaya would be very appriciated. Patichcha Samuppadaya helps to learn how Loba, Dwesha, Moha cause us to suffer.

    3. Understanding how to make no cause for suffering -
    Here is the way. Seela > Samadi > Prakgna. Notice that 8 fold path can be categorized under these 3.

    I. Seela is to control yourselves (body & mouth). This can't be skipped because we need control the body before controlling mind.

    II. Samadi is to control the mind. In other words, to keep focus on one thing. this keep five precepts deactivated as long as we keep our focus on one thing. This is very important because you can't see the truth about world if you've the five precepts on your mind. However this doen't clean your mind permanently of the Five Precepts.

    III. Prakgna is to break the Sansara Cycle & stop suffering. Thinking in deep with a open-mind about what we got known in the 2nd of 4 noble truth. We should remove the cause(s) from our mind it's not a deactivation of Five Precepts. They need to be removed permanently. This step would be completed when practicing with a open-mind. So that's why 2nd step should be done before this.

    4. Fouth is to walk the way we understood in 3rd step. (Seela > Samadi > Prakgna) The person who did it is en-lighted and have broken the Sansara Cycle and have realized the truth about world.

    disclaimer: for information purposes. :shocked:
    please correct if i've posted something incorrect. :D
     
    Aug 19, 2008
    11,653
    167
    0
    Sri Lanka
    ChuttaFX said:
    This is how Assaji Smanera introduced Buddhism to Upathissa Pririwaji (who became Sariyuth Rahathn Wahanse)


    This means that if there is no cause, there is no effect. So that, if there is no cause for suffering, there is no suffering. Notice that this explains about four noble truth.

    Four noble truth

    1. Suffering -
    First we should know what suffering is. Suffering is what we experience. If something that we don't like, happens we suffers. If something that we like, doesn't happen, we suffers.

    2. Understanding why suffering effects -
    Suffering is what what we experience / The effect / The result of something. The way of understanding why suffering effects is called Patichcha Samuppadaya. (Identifying the main cause(s) by going step-by-step backward with causes & effects). Please someone explain it well as I can't remember it all. So explaining Patichcha Samuppadaya would be very appriciated. Patichcha Samuppadaya helps to learn how Loba, Dwesha, Moha cause us to suffer.

    3. Understanding how to make no cause for suffering -
    Here is the way. Seela > Samadi > Prakgna. Notice that 8 fold path can be categorized under these 3.

    I. Seela is to control yourselves (body & mouth). This can't be skipped because we need control the body before controlling mind.

    II. Samadi is to control the mind. In other words, to keep focus on one thing. this keep five precepts deactivated as long as we keep our focus on one thing. This is very important because you can't see the truth about world if you've the five precepts on your mind. However this doen't clean your mind permanently of the Five Precepts.

    III. Prakgna is to break the Sansara Cycle & stop suffering. Thinking in deep with a open-mind about what we got known in the 2nd of 4 noble truth. We should remove the cause(s) from our mind it's not a deactivation of Five Precepts. They need to be removed permanently. This step would be completed when practicing with a open-mind. So that's why 2nd step should be done before this.

    4. Fouth is to walk the way we understood in 3rd step. (Seela > Samadi > Prakgna) The person who did it is en-lighted and have broken the Sansara Cycle and have realized the truth about world.

    disclaimer: for information purposes. :shocked:
    please correct if i've posted something incorrect. :D

    I like your explanation...
    What is the real cause of suffering...
    How do we suffer because of that.
     

    sri_lion

    Member
    Sep 14, 2006
    12,908
    102
    0
    Kuala Lumpur
    AtulaSiriwardane said:

    You said
    "your understanding of the Dhamma makes the difference"
    Walk the path seem to mean something beyond understanding.
    How to walk the path?






    You said
    "your understanding of the Dhamma makes the difference"
    Understanding eight fold path
    is not seem to be enough it seems.

    I will leave other 6.
    Can you explain these two in detail.

    7. Samma-Sati - Right Awareness
    8. Samma-Samadhi - Right Consciousness

    Lord Buddha explains this In Magga-vibhanga Sutra

    And what, monks, is right mindfulness?

    (i) There is the case where a monk remains focused on the body in & of itself — ardent, aware, & mindful — putting away greed & distress with reference to the world.

    (ii) He remains focused on feelings in & of themselves — ardent, aware, & mindful — putting away greed & distress with reference to the world.

    (iii) He remains focused on the mind in & of itself — ardent, aware, & mindful — putting away greed & distress with reference to the world.

    (iv) He remains focused on mental qualities in & of themselves — ardent, aware, & mindful — putting away greed & distress with reference to the world. This, monks, is called right mindfulness.

    And what, monks, is right concentration?

    (i) There is the case where a monk — quite withdrawn from sensuality, withdrawn from unskillful (mental) qualities — enters & remains in the first jhana: rapture & pleasure born from withdrawal, accompanied by directed thought & evaluation.

    (ii) With the stilling of directed thoughts & evaluations, he enters & remains in the second jhana: rapture & pleasure born of concentration, unification of awareness free from directed thought & evaluation — internal assurance.

    (iii) With the fading of rapture, he remains equanimous, mindful, & alert, and senses pleasure with the body. He enters & remains in the third jhana, of which the Noble Ones declare, 'Equanimous & mindful, he has a pleasant abiding.'

    (iv) With the abandoning of pleasure & pain — as with the earlier disappearance of elation & distress — he enters & remains in the fourth jhana: purity of equanimity & mindfulness, neither pleasure nor pain. This, monks, is called right concentration.
     
    Aug 19, 2008
    11,653
    167
    0
    Sri Lanka
    sri_lion said:
    Lord Buddha explains this In Magga-vibhanga Sutra

    Quote:
    And what, monks, is right mindfulness?

    (i) There is the case where a monk remains focused on the body in & of itself — ardent, aware, & mindful — putting away greed & distress with reference to the world.

    (ii) He remains focused on feelings in & of themselves — ardent, aware, & mindful — putting away greed & distress with reference to the world.

    (iii) He remains focused on the mind in & of itself — ardent, aware, & mindful — putting away greed & distress with reference to the world.

    (iv) He remains focused on mental qualities in & of themselves — ardent, aware, & mindful — putting away greed & distress with reference to the world. This, monks, is called right mindfulness.

    http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn45/sn45.008.than.html

    Do you think understanding this make us in samma sati?