Calm down baby. Your hallucinations will not hide facts. Let me break this down for your little brain to digest properly in simple logics.
First, you absolutely CAN make a statement in from of a question for something obvious for the questioner.
For example, you do something extremely stupid, and I ask, "Are you crazy?" Although, this seems to be a question, the intention is not to know if you are crazy or not.
It is a statement to say that you did something stupid. I can bring you a bunch of examples for statements like this in question form.
So, “A Question is a question irrespective of what precedes it" -
DOES NOT hold true always. You
must pay attention to the whole, not just the preceding. Got it baby?
FACT-1: A statement can be in a form of a question.
Now, let’s see your 3 questions (or statements)
1. මේ ලෝකේ තියෙන සංකත (සකස් වුනු දේවල්) වලින් චක්රයක නොපවතින දෙයක් පෙන්නන්න පුලුවන්ද මහත්තය?
2. භවය විතරක් එහෙම නොවී තියෙන්න හේතුවක් තියෙනවද?
3. එහෙනම් සංසාරය හුදු විශ්වාසයක් පමණක් වියයුතුද?
Now, your 2nd question:
භවය විතරක් එහෙම නොවී තියෙන්න හේතුවක් තියෙනවද?. This means:
Everything එහෙම වෙනව.. but why not Bhawa - You clearly
state here that
Everything is cyclic. (You couldn’t prove it though, that’s why whole this thing came out to defend your butt
) - Simple and easy logic.
Since, you clearly
claim everything is cycle. The 1st statement
CAN NOT be a question
anymore, it
MUST be a statement.
FACT-2: 1st question is a statement although it is in the form of question.
STATEMENT/CLAIM-1: Everything is cyclic (couldn’t prove) - FAILED.
This also, validates the Fact-1
Now, let's see if your second question is a question or a statement.
2. භවය විතරක් එහෙම නොවී තියෙන්න හේතුවක් තියෙනවද?
3.
එහෙනම් සංසාරය හුදු විශ්වාසයක් පමණක් වියයුතුද?
එහෙනම්
- this means "ehema nam" in otherwards because of that. Because of what? Because of the 2nd question. In order for you to use the 2nd question as a fact for the 3rd, the 2nd CAN’T be a question, it MUST be a statement.
Although, you try to neglect the importance of this word, this is a KEY word. If the 3rd question has nothing to do with the 2nd, why would you use the word "
එහෙනම් " at all? - Simple logic again.
FACT-3: 2nd question is a statement although it is in a question form with question mark.
STATEMENT/CLAIM-2: Bhawa should also be cyclic (couldn’t prove) - FAILED.
So far,
1.
Everything is cyclic - FAILED
2.
Bhawa should also be cyclic – FAILED
3. Because of the above, should samsara only be a belief?
For someone already claims that Bhawa is cyclic, why in the world someone (unless a retarded, this is a possibility too
) would raise a REAL question if samsara is a belief? Isn't this obvious?
It is clearly a statement to say, BECASUE OF bhawa is cyclic, there is no reason just to believe in samsara.
In fact, the post you replied to, he clearly says "ම සංසාරේ විශ්වාස කරනවා ඔයාලට විශ්වාස නැති හින්දා මෙහෙම කිව්වේ", so why you ask again if it is a belief? He already said he believes in it.
FACT-3 – 3rd is also a statement.
STATEMENT/CLAIM-3: Samsara is not just a belief (couldn’t prove) - FAILED.
It is simply and logically showed, what you are trying bend. This is how you have been doing thus far in this and other threads by moving your goal every minute. Now either you can change logic rules or change meaning of words to match your claims similar to your teacher who is good at doing it.
Now, don’t bring your favorite words list and chant like a parrot.
Get your facts and logics straight and we will have a talk.
