ඔව හිතට දුකට කියන කතා හිත හදාගන්ඩ කියන, මහින්ද වික්ක එක රාජය ආයතානක් පෙන්නපන් බලන්ඩ....වද තිරිසනාත් විකුණන් කනවා. වද නැති තිරිසනාත් විකුණන් කනවා. තොපි තොපේ තිරිසනාගේ පස්චාත් බාගේ ලෙව කනවා
Latest ads
-
I'll research & write an article - Rs. 2000 onwards
- Blogerwiki
- Updated:
-
House Plan- lenura
- Updated:
-
iphone x used- AssassiN1
- Updated:
-
කිතුල් තලප- Manoj Suranga Bandara
- Updated:
මාගම්පුර වරාය විකීණිම පිලිබද ඔබේ අදහස
- Thread starter r.pathirana
- Start date
ඔව හිතට දුකට කියන කතා හිත හදාගන්ඩ කියන, මහින්ද වික්ක එක රාජය ආයතානක් පෙන්නපන් බලන්ඩ....
ethakota MR oya company ekatama colombo south terminal eka dunnahama hondaida?
Last year, Sri Lanka managed to cause a good deal of trepidation in New Delhi when a Chinese submarine, Changzheng-2, was spotted docking in Colombo, flanked by a Chinese warship. Observers took the visit as a sign that China “has its sights set on dominating the Indian Ocean.” Still, the submarine visit put Sri Lanka in a bit of an awkward position diplomatically with New Delhi. One important detail of the entire incident that did not make it into mainstream reporting was that the sub did not dock in a Sri Lanka-controlled port facility designed to accommodate military vessels. Instead, the submarine ended up at the Colombo South Container Terminal (CSCT), a facility controlled by a Chinese developer. While that facility was able to accommodate the submarine, the entire incident may have taken place without the express approval of the Mahinda Rajapaksa government.
- http://thediplomat.com/2015/03/sri-l...se-submarines/
ethakota MR oya company ekatama colombo south terminal eka dunnahama hondaida?
Last year, Sri Lanka managed to cause a good deal of trepidation in New Delhi when a Chinese submarine, Changzheng-2, was spotted docking in Colombo, flanked by a Chinese warship. Observers took the visit as a sign that China “has its sights set on dominating the Indian Ocean.” Still, the submarine visit put Sri Lanka in a bit of an awkward position diplomatically with New Delhi. One important detail of the entire incident that did not make it into mainstream reporting was that the sub did not dock in a Sri Lanka-controlled port facility designed to accommodate military vessels. Instead, the submarine ended up at the Colombo South Container Terminal (CSCT), a facility controlled by a Chinese developer. While that facility was able to accommodate the submarine, the entire incident may have taken place without the express approval of the Mahinda Rajapaksa government.
- http://thediplomat.com/2015/03/sri-l...se-submarines/
දැන් කොලබ වරය මහින්ද විකුනලද?? එතකොට අර්ජුන රණතුග පාලනේ කරන්නෙ ධීවර වරායන් ටික විතරද???? එහෙමද කියන්ඩ හදන්නෙ???
දැන් ඔයාට සතුටුද, හම්බන්තොට වරාය විකිනීමත් එකක පැතූ වෙනස උදා උනාද???
ඔක තමයි ලක්ශ 62කි මීහරක් රැල පැතූ වෙනස. තීකුනාමල වරාය වද අගමැතිය ඇමරිකාවට වික්කම, නියමෙටම හිටිනව එතකොට වෙනස උපරිමේට ලක්ශ 62කේ මීහරකුන්ට අත්විදින්ඩ පුලුවන්...
වද පො&නය ,මහබැන්කු හොරා ,පබය,හිවල ,මෝඩය ,62 මීහරක් ,අපේ කාලෙ ඔහොම උනේ නෑ හන්දුරුවනේ .අම්මේ තාත්තේ ඔබේ දරුවා මගෙත් දරුවා ,ඔබයි අපේ අප්පච්චීදැන් කොලබ වරය මහින්ද විකුනලද?? එතකොට අර්ජුන රණතුග පාලනේ කරන්නෙ ධීවර වරායන් ටික විතරද???? එහෙමද කියන්ඩ හදන්නෙ???
දැන් ඔයාට සතුටුද, හම්බන්තොට වරාය විකිනීමත් එකක පැතූ වෙනස උදා උනාද???
ආණ්ඩුව කරන ලොකුම වරද තමයි ECT එක විකුණන එක. JCT එකේ draft එකේ ප්ර්මනේ නැව් දැන් හදන්නේ නැ එක නිසා JCT එක වැඩක් නැතිව යනවා දැනට ඒ ප්ර්මනේ නැව් සේවයෙන් ඉවත් වෙලා ගියහම. එක නිසා වරයට අදිකරියට හොද අදායමක් ගන්න ගැබුර වැඩි ECT එක අපි තියාගන්න් ඕන, එහෙම තමයි අපි සැලසුම් කරල තිබුනේ, එකේ crane ටික විතරයි ගන්න තිබුනේ අනිත් ගමදේම කරලා ඉවරයි වාරයේ ඉන්ගිනේරු සංගම් ඇතුළු සේවක සංගම් පැහැදිලිවම තේරුම් කරද්දී එක බදු දෙන්න යනේ එහෙම උනොත් අපිට container terminal එකක නැතිවයනවා. මෙගේම විරුද්ද වෙද්දී (වරයා ඇමති පවා විරුද්ද වෙද්දී ) රනිල්ගේ තනි තිරනයර්ට එක කරන්න යනේ . වෙන්දේසියට 18 දෙනෙක් ලන්සු තියල තිබුනා දන්න විදියට ඉන්දියන් කාරයෙක්ට යනේ. නහය ලගට හිලුන එකේ ඔලුව උඩින් ගියත් මොකද කියල තාව නායක අරගෙන crane ටික අරගත්තනම් හරි නමුත් රනිල් ඉන්නේ විකුණන මතේම තමයි
It's a failed project but could be boosted up like dubai with spending some billions of usd to develop the entire area industrially. China has capital and we don't.
Once Chinese start operating I don't think even government can sneak peek at their operation. This deal seal the fate of Maritime in Indian Ocean.
මට මේක කියවද්දී මතක් උනේ එක ඇමෙරිකන් කාරයෙක් කියල තිබුන අපි දුප්පත් රටවලට airports, habours, highways වගේ එක එක ප්රොජෙක්ට් වලට නය ආධාර දෙනවා
දීල උන්ට නය ගෙවාගන්න බැරි වෙද්දී දේපල උන්ට ලිය ගන්නවා කියලා
මට මේ කියපු එක මීටර් නැහැ
මෙතනත් වෙන්නේ එකමයි
ප්රකොටි ගානක් වටින හම්බන්තොට වරාය විකුනගෙන කෑවෙ වද අගමැතියගෙ ආර්තික ඔස්තාර් වැඩපිලිවෙල යටතේ.ඔක වගේ රටෙ ජාතික සම්පත් විකුනන තිරිසනෙක් රටේ අගමැති විදිහට පත් වීමේ ජාතියේ අවාසනාවක්. වෙනස ගාගෙන චන්දෙ දුන්න ලක්ශ 62කේ මීහරක් රැලට දැන් සතුටුද?? තොපිට වෙනස උදා උනාද පරයිනෙ....
ekomath eka kaleka awilla u kere okama thama eka nisa thama mn uta vote kere nathe
Bayyo katai p*kai wasa siti kaale...............
China gets controlling stake at Hambantota port
2014.10.19
By Namini Wijedasa
News that Sri Lanka had granted Chinese state-owned companies operating rights to four berths at the Hambantota Port once they are completed next year has caught the shipping industry unawares.
There had been no tenders or prior announcements. But Sri Lanka Ports Authority Chairman Priyath B Wickrama says the Government had agreed to such an arrangement with the Hambantota Port’s Chinese lenders as far back as 2010.
“We had an understanding with them when we took the loan,” he said in an interview with the Sunday Times. The loan agreement was signed with the Treasury.
He also revealed that, in exchange for these operating rights, the Chinese have consented to ease loan conditions. “That loan was a huge loan,” he said. “The Chinese Government (has) agreed to relax the loan conditions as well. So the terms of our Phase I loan and Phase II loan are being rearranged. Those negotiations are now ongoing with the Treasury.”
Dr. Wickrama, SLPA Chairman since 2008, said there could be concessions in repayment terms or the time granted for repayment. Phase I of Hambantota Port cost an estimated US$ 361 million with 85 per cent being met by Exim Bank of China. Phase II is priced at an estimated US$ 808 million and is a 100 per cent loan.
“The interest (levied) on the Phase II loan is only two per cent,” Dr. Wickrama said. “The Phase I loan is at 6.3 per cent interest. All these loans will be restructured.”
The ‘Agreement on Key Terms for Supply, Operate and Transfer (SOT) of Container Terminal Hambantota Port Development Project Phase II’ was entered into on September 16 in the presence of President Mahinda Rajapaksa and his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping. Dr Wickrama signed on behalf of Sri Lanka.
Signing for China were representatives of China Merchants Holdings International (CMHI) and China Communication Construction Company Ltd. (CCCC). The former already operates the new Colombo South Container Terminal which, at 18 metres, has the deepest berth anywhere in the country. The latter is building the 233-hectare artificial island known as Colombo Port City.
The partners in the Hambantota SOT will be CMHI and China Harbour Engineering Company Ltd, an engineering contractor and subsidiary of CCCC. China Harbour did Hambantota Phase I and is now completing Phase II.
When the SOT comes into effect (a date has not been decided) this group of companies will hold operating rights in both of Sri Lanka’s main ports. Additionally, the Chinese will have effective control of 108 hectares – 20 hectares on freehold basis and 88 on a 99-year lease — in Colombo Port City.
In Hambantota, the Chinese joint venture will have the bigger stake in the project company. According to an announcement made by CMHI to the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, it will hold 64.98 per cent (just 0.02 percent short of 65) of shares while SLPA will have the remaining 35.02 per cent. The total capital investment into the SOT is US$ 601 million, of which the Chinese will invest about US$ 391 million.
“The concession period to be granted to the Project Company under the SOT Agreement shall initially be 35 years from the commencement of operation of the SOT Project, which can be extended by five years at the option of the Project Company,” CMHI states.
The investment ratios of China Harbour and CMHI in the China joint venture are yet to be determined while the detailed terms and conditions of the SOT are still being discussed by the parties, it said.
Dr. Wickrama said the agreement only covers “the operational part” while the SLPA owns the property. The Chinese joint venture will supply container handling equipment and will guarantee revenue to the Ports Authority, depending on volumes. “That will ease our loan pressure as well,” the Chairman observed.
The SLPA is not investing money in the project company. “Our capital is the infrastructure we developed,” he explained. “We are not spending an additional cent. Their capital is equipment and development.” Construction is expected to finish by the end of 2015.
The Chairman said that the artificial island that was being built in Hambantota as part of Phase II would “belong 100 percent to us”. It will be reserved for port-related activities and front-end services, not warehouses or industries.
The Chinese have offered to bring business to the industries zone. Asked if they made a firm commitment, Dr. Wickrama replied: “They have agreed to bring industries. The Chinese government has also agreed to support us to bring investments. That will come within five years.”
None of this satisfactorily answers the question of why the public were not informed of the SOT agreement until it was signed. “We don’t want to disclose everything from the beginning,” Dr. Wickrama replied. “We have to discuss at initial level. Until we finalise something, we don’t say.”
“But this was there for some time,” Dr Wickrama reiterated. “It was there in the last agreement. If you properly go through the loan agreement we signed, this was there. Those things were published. They were not hidden.”
However, the Sunday Times was not able to secure a copy of the loan agreement. Dr Wickrama said it was at the Treasury and that “normally we cannot give Treasury loan agreements to you”. He also did not show us the agreement between the SLPA and the Colombo International Container Terminals Ltd that runs the Colombo South Harbour, which many Ports Authority officials said they had not seen.
A request for information about the SOT deal (sent via email) went unanswered by Treasury Secretary P.B. Jayasundera. A spokesman for the External Resources Department of the Ministry of Finance said they did not handle the SOT agreement and knew nothing about it.
- http://www.sundaytimes.lk/141019/news/china-gets-controlling-stake-at-hambantota-port-123262.html
China gets controlling stake at Hambantota port
2014.10.19
By Namini Wijedasa
News that Sri Lanka had granted Chinese state-owned companies operating rights to four berths at the Hambantota Port once they are completed next year has caught the shipping industry unawares.
There had been no tenders or prior announcements. But Sri Lanka Ports Authority Chairman Priyath B Wickrama says the Government had agreed to such an arrangement with the Hambantota Port’s Chinese lenders as far back as 2010.
“We had an understanding with them when we took the loan,” he said in an interview with the Sunday Times. The loan agreement was signed with the Treasury.
He also revealed that, in exchange for these operating rights, the Chinese have consented to ease loan conditions. “That loan was a huge loan,” he said. “The Chinese Government (has) agreed to relax the loan conditions as well. So the terms of our Phase I loan and Phase II loan are being rearranged. Those negotiations are now ongoing with the Treasury.”
Dr. Wickrama, SLPA Chairman since 2008, said there could be concessions in repayment terms or the time granted for repayment. Phase I of Hambantota Port cost an estimated US$ 361 million with 85 per cent being met by Exim Bank of China. Phase II is priced at an estimated US$ 808 million and is a 100 per cent loan.
“The interest (levied) on the Phase II loan is only two per cent,” Dr. Wickrama said. “The Phase I loan is at 6.3 per cent interest. All these loans will be restructured.”
The ‘Agreement on Key Terms for Supply, Operate and Transfer (SOT) of Container Terminal Hambantota Port Development Project Phase II’ was entered into on September 16 in the presence of President Mahinda Rajapaksa and his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping. Dr Wickrama signed on behalf of Sri Lanka.
Signing for China were representatives of China Merchants Holdings International (CMHI) and China Communication Construction Company Ltd. (CCCC). The former already operates the new Colombo South Container Terminal which, at 18 metres, has the deepest berth anywhere in the country. The latter is building the 233-hectare artificial island known as Colombo Port City.
The partners in the Hambantota SOT will be CMHI and China Harbour Engineering Company Ltd, an engineering contractor and subsidiary of CCCC. China Harbour did Hambantota Phase I and is now completing Phase II.
When the SOT comes into effect (a date has not been decided) this group of companies will hold operating rights in both of Sri Lanka’s main ports. Additionally, the Chinese will have effective control of 108 hectares – 20 hectares on freehold basis and 88 on a 99-year lease — in Colombo Port City.
In Hambantota, the Chinese joint venture will have the bigger stake in the project company. According to an announcement made by CMHI to the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, it will hold 64.98 per cent (just 0.02 percent short of 65) of shares while SLPA will have the remaining 35.02 per cent. The total capital investment into the SOT is US$ 601 million, of which the Chinese will invest about US$ 391 million.
“The concession period to be granted to the Project Company under the SOT Agreement shall initially be 35 years from the commencement of operation of the SOT Project, which can be extended by five years at the option of the Project Company,” CMHI states.
The investment ratios of China Harbour and CMHI in the China joint venture are yet to be determined while the detailed terms and conditions of the SOT are still being discussed by the parties, it said.
Dr. Wickrama said the agreement only covers “the operational part” while the SLPA owns the property. The Chinese joint venture will supply container handling equipment and will guarantee revenue to the Ports Authority, depending on volumes. “That will ease our loan pressure as well,” the Chairman observed.
The SLPA is not investing money in the project company. “Our capital is the infrastructure we developed,” he explained. “We are not spending an additional cent. Their capital is equipment and development.” Construction is expected to finish by the end of 2015.
The Chairman said that the artificial island that was being built in Hambantota as part of Phase II would “belong 100 percent to us”. It will be reserved for port-related activities and front-end services, not warehouses or industries.
The Chinese have offered to bring business to the industries zone. Asked if they made a firm commitment, Dr. Wickrama replied: “They have agreed to bring industries. The Chinese government has also agreed to support us to bring investments. That will come within five years.”
None of this satisfactorily answers the question of why the public were not informed of the SOT agreement until it was signed. “We don’t want to disclose everything from the beginning,” Dr. Wickrama replied. “We have to discuss at initial level. Until we finalise something, we don’t say.”
“But this was there for some time,” Dr Wickrama reiterated. “It was there in the last agreement. If you properly go through the loan agreement we signed, this was there. Those things were published. They were not hidden.”
However, the Sunday Times was not able to secure a copy of the loan agreement. Dr Wickrama said it was at the Treasury and that “normally we cannot give Treasury loan agreements to you”. He also did not show us the agreement between the SLPA and the Colombo International Container Terminals Ltd that runs the Colombo South Harbour, which many Ports Authority officials said they had not seen.
A request for information about the SOT deal (sent via email) went unanswered by Treasury Secretary P.B. Jayasundera. A spokesman for the External Resources Department of the Ministry of Finance said they did not handle the SOT agreement and knew nothing about it.
- http://www.sundaytimes.lk/141019/news/china-gets-controlling-stake-at-hambantota-port-123262.html
Last edited:
ඔක හරි සරලයි බන්. අයිරාන්ගනි සේරසින්හ කියන්නේ ඔකනේ, මම කිව්වට කමර්ශල් ක්රෙඩිට් එකට යන්න කියලා. ගියාම උන් මොකද කරන්නේ. ලොකු හීන මවල සරල පොලියට නය දෙනවා. දෙන බැන්කුවත් දන්නවා මූ මලාට් ගෙවන්නේ නැ කියලා. නමුත් දෙන එක දෙනවා. ත්රී වීල් නම් කීදාහක් තියනවද? කො එකෙන් කොල්ලො ගොඩ ගියාද? අතේ තිබ්බ ගානත් නැ ත්රීවීලුත් නැ. ඔකම තමා මේ වරායටත් උනේ. මහින්දට ලොකු හරබර ටොක් දිලා චීනා දිල නිව් සිල්ක් රොඩ් එක දාලා මහින්දව ඇන්දුවා වරාය හදන තැනට ගේන්න. නැත්තම් උන් බූරුවොද ගොඩබිමක් කපලා මූදට දාලා රට ඇතුලට මූද ගේන්නේ.. ඒ තමා උන්ගේ උපාය. උන් දන්නවා GDP එකත් එක්ක මලාට සිරිලන්කන් උන්ට මේක ගෙවන්න බැ, ලගදිම වරාය අපිට කියලා. ඔක කාලය පිලිබද ප්රශ්නයක්. අද අත්සන් නොකලත් එට කරන්න වෙනවා. තියාගෙන ඉන්න දවසක් පාසා අතින් සල්ලි යන එකනේ වෙන්නේ. චීනා කලේ අනවශ්ය ආයොජනයක් අවශ්යයි කියලා මවලා ගොනාට අන්දපු එක. ඒක කලේ උන්ට වාසියට මිසක නයක් දීලා ප්රොජෙක්ට් එකක් කරලා නය පොලියත් එක්ක ගන්න අදහසින් නෙමෙයි. එහෙම අදහසක් තිබ්බනම් ඉස්සෙල්ලාම කරන්නේ ඔතන ෆිල්ඩ් රිපොට් එකක් අරගෙන ඔපචුනිටීස් හොයල නව් සමාගම් එක්ක කතා කරලා වැඩේ කරනවා. මේ ඒ කිසිදෙයක් නැතුව හාවා කරලා ඉඩම ගත්තේ උන්ගේ වාසියට. ඔක එයාර්පොට් එකටත් අනිවරෙන් වෙනවා.
See machan maritime industry experts told our gov leaders wht we need is a bunkering port not an large scale container handling port...CBK,Ranil (2001) n MR all wanted to go against de advice of industry experts coz of Chinese influence. ..
China wants Hamba to be de transit hub to Africa this event of handing over de port to a x or y Chinese blue chip company is jst a symbolic thing..they built it now they gonna rule it...GOSL should firmly stick with de ruling of service sector open only for them self
hadanna US$ 1169 million + yata thibba gala kadanna $40 million
Dr. Wickrama, SLPA Chairman since 2008, said there could be concessions in repayment terms or the time granted for repayment. Phase I of Hambantota Port cost an estimated US$ 361 million with 85 per cent being met by Exim Bank of China. Phase II is priced at an estimated US$ 808 million and is a 100 per cent loan.
“The interest (levied) on the Phase II loan is only two per cent,” Dr. Wickrama said. “The Phase I loan is at 6.3 per cent interest. All these loans will be restructured.”
- http://www.sundaytimes.lk/141019/news/china-gets-controlling-stake-at-hambantota-port-123262.html
Sri Lanka’s port authority in August said it has asked China for $40 million loan to demolish a massive seabed rock obstructing the entrance of its new $1.4 billion Hambantota port, due to start commercial operations this year.
- http://www.adaderana.lk/news.php?nid=15949
Last edited:
Pakistane Gwadar Port ekatath China okamai kale
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gwadar_Port
Next Bangladesh:
- http://www.maritime-executive.com/article/china-set-to-offer-bangladesh-port-funding
Last edited:
China expanding their empire when US backed out from them. More to come when US companies withdraw from several sectors in China due to new opportunities rise within the us itself. China's only hope is gain access to asian market and link singapore to south africa. This particular route need a pit stop in Indian ocean and they cannot rely on India due to political conflict. Sri Lanka is the gold mine for them. If somehow SL politicians turn this in to our favors, this would have been the turning point of SL economy. Sadly they just cashed out the golden geese.
