Breaking! German Leopard යුධ ටැංකි යුද පෙරමුණේ වැඩ අල්ලයි! 💣💥

Omega_Jay

Well-known member
  • Jul 16, 2017
    3,162
    1,708
    113
    ඩොටේ ¯\(°_o)/¯
    1) NATO උන්ගේ cutting edge weapons යුක්රේනෙට දීල

    NATO cutting edge weapons 😂

    witladsr8tj81.jpg
     

    Edward Kenway

    Well-known member
  • Jan 8, 2015
    12,658
    14,283
    113
    Seriously? ඊයා!
    අමුතුවෙන් තර්ක කර කර ඉන්න දෙයක් නෑ .
    Already provided the details with the weapon type and the news sources.
    කුඹි පුකක් තරම් මොලයක් නැති එකෙක්ට උනත් ඕක බැලුවම තේරෙනවා.
    හෙන බංකලොත් තර්කනේ පුතා ඔයා දාන්නේ. :baffled:

    ඕකනේ බඩුව වගේ වටේ යනවා මිසක් තාම කිව්වේ නෑනේ? අයිසේ මම අහන්නේ තමුසෙගෙ මතය නැතුව google එකේ තියන දේ නෙවෙයි :lol:

    මම අහන්නේ උඹේ තර්කෙ අනුව

    1) NATO උන්ගේ cutting edge weapons යුක්රේනෙට දීල
    2) NATO උන්ගේ cutting edge weapons යුක්රේනෙට දීල නෑ

    වටේ නොයා සරලව කියපන්කො උඹ තර්ක කරන්නේ ඔය දෙකෙන් කෝක කියලද? :lol:

    Oh ,As per your thinking The US military won the war, but they had to leave the country under fire, leaving a large haul of military hardware behind. Just the same as they did in Somalia, Vietnam and Iraq. they may call it any thing but it is a defeat.

    battle victories do not always translate to military victory.

    The Vietnam War is the best display of this; during that conflict, the US military won almost all battles while Vietnamese forces lost each engagement but ultimately won the War.

    there is a true story about this: Following the Vietnam War, US Army colonel had spoken with his North Vietnamese counterpart . US Colonel told him, "You know, you never beat us on the battlefield," North Vietnamese responded, "That may be so, but it is also irrelevant.

    warfare is an Art, Yes technology plays vital part but mostly motivated fighting soldiers will win the war.

    Dude we are talking about military victories and losses. US won every single battle in Vietnam but lost war because they ran out of political will to fight. That has nothing to do with military.

    In Iraq and Afghanistan US achieved every single military objective. If you dispute that then show me one military objective they failed to achieve. But after gaining the control of the entire country then what? What are you going to do with it? Occupy it forever? That's where things went wrong and it is Politics. No amount of military power can solve these issues.

    Where as Russia miserably failed at it's military objectives in Ukraine. If they were to succeed then yes they could have faced same political conundrums that US faced in Iraq and Afghanistan.
     

    Dr.Sheldon_Suprakata

    Well-known member
  • Feb 7, 2018
    5,711
    1
    14,277
    113
    ඕකනේ බඩුව වගේ වටේ යනවා මිසක් තාම කිව්වේ නෑනේ? අයිසේ මම අහන්නේ තමුසෙගෙ මතය නැතුව google එකේ තියන දේ නෙවෙයි :lol:

    මම අහන්නේ උඹේ තර්කෙ අනුව

    1) NATO උන්ගේ cutting edge weapons යුක්රේනෙට දීල
    2) NATO උන්ගේ cutting edge weapons යුක්රේනෙට දීල නෑ

    Grow up man. මගේ තර්ක අහලද NATO එකෙන් සෙලෙන්ස්කිට weapon දීලා තියෙන්නේ? LOL
    උබ සිගිති ආතල්නේ දෙන්නේ බන්.
    කිසිම වටේ යමක් නෑ, අනික තර්ක කරන්නේ මොන මගුලකට ද? මෙතන facts තියෙන්නේ.
    උන්ට දීපු so-called cutting edge weapons and එක confirm කර ගන්න උබට අවශ්‍යය news source එකේ details පවා දිලා තියෙනවා.

    උබ හිතුවද බන් මම NATO or Pentagon වල Armory audit කරනවා කියලා?
    පොඩ්ඩක් google කරලා බලපන්.
    අත දරුවට වගේ හැමදේම අපිට කියලා දෙන්න බෑ නේ බන්.
    Anyway, ever heard about NLAW, M270 rocket system, etc?
    උබේ සරල ප්‍රශේනෙට උත්තරේ sources එක්කම දාලා තියෙනවා.

    - NLAW
    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/03/12/inside-story-britain-armed-ukraines-resistance-russia/

    - M270 rocket systems
    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2022/06/18/britains-response-ukraine-best-western-powers/

    - TB2 Bayraktar
    https://www.baykartech.com/en/uav/bayraktar-tb2/

    - Drones
    https://www.airandspaceforces.com/cutting-edge-drones-headed-to-ukraine-in-latest-us-aid/

    - AMRAAM & NASAMS
    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-n...m-iron-dome-stop-putins-rockets-proving-hard/

    - HIMARS
    https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/products/himars.html

    - Excalibur S shell (Precision Guided Artillery Shells)
    One of the most cutting-edge shells the US has at its disposal. It uses a Laser guidance system instead of GPS. The US didn't admit that they have sent this variant to Ukarain, but saw it on one of the pro-Ukrainian telegram channel videos and will share the URL if I found it again.

    Ukraine may be the battlefield, but it is no longer a secret that this war is now happening between the collective West and Russia.

    Even a 5th grader can understand that the USA is using the MQ 9 UAV to gather intelligence and provide that surveillance data to the Armed forces of Ukraine. It's common sense. They previously used this data to attack Russian command posts and other valuable targets using precision-guided weapons.

    https://abcnews.go.com/Internationa...ucial-ukraine-top-commander/story?id=97059698

    If not what exactly US drone doing so close to Crimea? Was it engaged in a peace program before the Russians peed on it? LOL

    Next timeවත් පොඩ්ඩක් හරියට කියවලා අවබෝද කරගෙන එන්න පුතා :baffled:

    උබට මේ ප්‍රශ්නෙට මම කලින් දීපු answer එක ආයිත් quote කරලා තියෙනවා.
    Seriously අහන්නේ, මේක බැලුවම මුකුත්ම තේරෙන්නේ නැද්ද පුතා? :baffled:


    NATO cutting edge weapons 😂

    witladsr8tj81.jpg

    Hammo, you made my day bro!
    cutting edge weoපොන්ස් :baffled:
     
    Last edited:
    • Haha
    Reactions: Omega_Jay

    sarika406

    Well-known member
  • Jun 15, 2008
    2,404
    2,002
    113
    Dude we are talking about military victories and losses. US won every single battle in Vietnam but lost war because they ran out of political will to fight. That has nothing to do with military.
    As I mentioned earlier post battle victories are irrelevant, You should be insane to compare a well-established military with great ORBAT to a rug-tag militia with assault rifles and a few crude weapons in a direct confrontation, It would be comparable to sending a rabbit to fight a lion and then declaring the lion won the battle. There are three levels of warfare, tactical, operational and strategic. You and I are comparing apples and oranges because I am speaking at the strategic level while you are at the tactical level.

    Military is a one of many tool of a politician, so war and peace is a political decisions. Military strategies shaped up by the Political intentions. This is called as Politico-military nexus so losing a war is everybody’s baby.


    In Iraq and Afghanistan US achieved every single military objective. If you dispute that then show me one military objective they failed to achieve.


    “objectives that we had for this campaign from the day we started the destruction of the al Qaeda terrorist network inside Afghanistan, the destruction of this illegitimate government of the Taliban which was in place and harbored that network” Those were the US objectives of Operation Enduring Freedom as per Minute of Committee On Armed Services United States Senate hearing in 2002. So tell me what objective they achieved. Al-Qaeda is still there under different management, and the US had to give the country back again to the Taliban, which they tried to destroy first place as per their objectives and withdraw under fire.
    But after gaining the control of the entire country then what? What are you going to do with it? Occupy it forever? That's where things went wrong and it is Politics. No amount of military power can solve these issues.
    This is really funny. Do you make rash decisions in your personal life and then wonder what happened to you in the end, let alone in warfare? Again, as I previously stated, the US military preaches a Ways, Ends, and Means strategy of warfare while failing to define its end state in Afghanistan war. Really professional .. :lol:
    Where as Russia miserably failed at it's military objectives in Ukraine. If they were to succeed then yes they could have faced same political conundrums that US faced in Iraq and Afghanistan.
    Do you know their real military objective? you have to know their objectives in order to demonstrate that they are failing. Military objectives, as far as I know, are confidential, and I only know what the Russians have stated in the media. A limited war with the objective of "the liberation of the Donbas, the defence of its people, and the creation of conditions which would guarantee the security of Russia itself." so I think they are still on track and hope the Russians will not repeat dumb things they have done previously, the same as their counterpart.
     
    Last edited:

    Edward Kenway

    Well-known member
  • Jan 8, 2015
    12,658
    14,283
    113
    Grow up man. මගේ තර්ක අහලද NATO එකෙන් සෙලෙන්ස්කිට weapon දීලා තියෙන්නේ? LOL
    උබ සිගිති ආතල්නේ දෙන්නේ බන්.
    කිසිම වටේ යමක් නෑ, අනික තර්ක කරන්නේ මොන මගුලකට ද? මෙතන facts තියෙන්නේ.
    උන්ට දීපු so-called cutting edge weapons and එක confirm කර ගන්න උබට අවශ්‍යය news source එකේ details පවා දිලා තියෙනවා.



    උබට මේ ප්‍රශ්නෙට මම කලින් දීපු answer එක ආයිත් quote කරලා තියෙනවා.
    Seriously අහන්නේ, මේක බැලුවම මුකුත්ම තේරෙන්නේ නැද්ද පුතා? :baffled:




    Hammo, you made my day bro!
    cutting edge weoපොන්ස් :baffled:

    උඹ තර්ක කරන්නේ උන්ට cutting edge weapons දුන්න කියලද නෑ කියලද? ඇයි බං ඔය සරල දේ කියන්න ඔච්චර බය?

    වටේම තියන google හෑලි අලවන්න පුළුවන් ඕක කියාගන්න කොන්ද පන නෑ මොකද්ද අයිසේ ඔය ජිවිතේ? :rofl:

    As I mentioned earlier post battle victories are irrelevant, You should be insane to compare a well-established military with great ORBAT to a rug-tag militia with assault rifles and a few crude weapons in a direct confrontation, It would be comparable to sending a rabbit to fight a lion and then declaring the lion won the battle. There are three levels of warfare, tactical, operational and strategic. You and I are comparing apples and oranges because I am speaking at the strategic level while you are at the tactical level.

    Military is a one of many tool of a politician, so war and peace is a political decisions. Military strategies shaped up by the Political intentions. This is called as Politico-military nexus so losing a war is everybody’s baby.




    “objectives that we had for this campaign from the day we started the destruction of the al Qaeda terrorist network inside Afghanistan, the destruction of this illegitimate government of the Taliban which was in place and harbored that network” Those were the US objectives of Operation Enduring Freedom as per Minute of Committee On Armed Services United States Senate hearing in 2002. So tell me what objective they achieved. Al-Qaeda is still there under different management, and the US had to give the country back again to the Taliban, which they tried to destroy first place as per their objectives and withdraw under fire.

    This is really funny. Do you make rash decisions in your personal life and then wonder what happened to you in the end, let alone in warfare? Again, as I previously stated, the US military preaches a Ways, Ends, and Means strategy of warfare while failing to define its end state in Afghanistan war. Really professional .. :lol:

    Do you know their real military objective? you have to know their objectives in order to demonstrate that they are failing. Military objectives, as far as I know, are confidential, and I only know what the Russians have stated in the media. A limited war with the objective of "the liberation of the Donbas, the defence of its people, and the creation of conditions which would guarantee the security of Russia itself." so I think they are still on track and hope the Russians will not repeat dumb things they have done previously, the same as their counterpart.

    “objectives that we had for this campaign from the day we started the destruction of the al Qaeda terrorist network inside Afghanistan, the destruction of this illegitimate government of the Taliban which was in place and harbored that network”

    Yes that did happen. US took control of the country so said government seized to exist.


    US had to give the country back again

    What else they can do? stay there forever? :lol: If Afghan people themself are not willing to fight against Taliban what are the options?

    As per Russian failed invasion, if you can't spot their failures then you are beyond help. Look what happened in Kiev. "Still on track" :rofl:
     

    sarika406

    Well-known member
  • Jun 15, 2008
    2,404
    2,002
    113
    “objectives that we had for this campaign from the day we started the destruction of the al Qaeda terrorist network inside Afghanistan, the destruction of this illegitimate government of the Taliban which was in place and harbored that network”

    Yes that did happen. US took control of the country so said government seized to exist.
    They spent two three trillion dollars and a great deal of human suffering over 20 years to overthrow the Taliban's illegitimate government in Afghanistan, only to hand the country back to the same illegitimate Taliban government. further, they permitted China, their main economic rival, to become the new Afghan government's largest partner and access the nation's untapped resources. very nice move ..:rofl::rofl:
    What else they can do? stay there forever? :lol: If Afghan people themself are not willing to fight against Taliban what are the options?
    Learn from Russia :lol: You should study how Russians permanently pacified Chechnya during the second Chechen war and motivate them to fight alongside Russians in the Ukraine war.

    As per Russian failed invasion, if you can't spot their failures then you are beyond help. Look what happened in Kiev. "Still on track" :rofl:

    Nobody knows Russia's military objectives and their time lines, then how can you say they failed? What happened in Kiev, by the way?
     

    Dr.Sheldon_Suprakata

    Well-known member
  • Feb 7, 2018
    5,711
    1
    14,277
    113
    උඹ තර්ක කරන්නේ උන්ට cutting edge weapons දුන්න කියලද නෑ කියලද? ඇයි බං ඔය සරල දේ කියන්න ඔච්චර බය?
    වටේම තියන google හෑලි අලවන්න පුළුවන් ඕක කියාගන්න කොන්ද පන නෑ මොකද්ද අයිසේ ඔය ජිවිතේ? :rofl:

    බංකලොත් තර්ක කියන්නේ මේවට තමයි.
    Ukarain උන්ට දීලා තියෙන්නේ කියලා මම කොහොමද උබට පැහැදිලි කරලා දෙන්න ඕනේ.
    උන්ට හම්බ උන weapon type එකේ details and එක confirm කර ගන්න ඕනේ news source එක්කම දීලා තියෙනවා.
    යුද පෙරමුණේ ඉන්න එකෙක් වත් ඇවිල්ලා මේක සරල සිංහලෙන් මේ මනුස්සයට කියලා දීපං දෙයියනේ.

    උන්ට දීපු so-called cutting edge weapons and එක confirm කර ගන්න උබට අවශ්‍යය news source එකේ details පවා දිලා තියෙනවා.

    උබ හිතුවද බන් මම NATO or Pentagon වල Armory audit කරනවා කියලා?
    පොඩ්ඩක් google කරලා බලපන්.
    අත දරුවට වගේ හැමදේම අපිට කියලා දෙන්න බෑ නේ බන්.
    Anyway, ever heard about NLAW, M270 rocket system, etc?
    උබේ සරල ප්‍රශේනෙට උත්තරේ sources එක්කම දාලා තියෙනවා.

    - NLAW
    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/03/12/inside-story-britain-armed-ukraines-resistance-russia/

    - M270 rocket systems
    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2022/06/18/britains-response-ukraine-best-western-powers/

    - TB2 Bayraktar
    https://www.baykartech.com/en/uav/bayraktar-tb2/

    - Drones
    https://www.airandspaceforces.com/cutting-edge-drones-headed-to-ukraine-in-latest-us-aid/

    - AMRAAM & NASAMS
    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-n...m-iron-dome-stop-putins-rockets-proving-hard/

    - HIMARS
    https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/products/himars.html

    - Excalibur S shell (Precision Guided Artillery Shells)
    One of the most cutting-edge shells the US has at its disposal. It uses a Laser guidance system instead of GPS. The US didn't admit that they have sent this variant to Ukarain, but saw it on one of the pro-Ukrainian telegram channel videos and will share the URL if I found it again.

    Ukraine may be the battlefield, but it is no longer a secret that this war is now happening between the collective West and Russia.

    Even a 5th grader can understand that the USA is using the MQ 9 UAV to gather intelligence and provide that surveillance data to the Armed forces of Ukraine. It's common sense. They previously used this data to attack Russian command posts and other valuable targets using precision-guided weapons.

    https://abcnews.go.com/Internationa...ucial-ukraine-top-commander/story?id=97059698

    If not what exactly US drone doing so close to Crimea? Was it engaged in a peace program before the Russians peed on it? LOL

    Next timeවත් පොඩ්ඩක් හරියට කියවලා අවබෝද කරගෙන එන්න පුතා :baffled:

    How does this look to you? in case If you don't understand Sinhala, I have already provided the details of what these සෝ-called cutting-edge weapons were received by Ukraine.
    Kindly refer to the above post to avoid such misunderstanding at your earliest convenience.

    මේ හෑලි නෙවෙයි පුතා, facts with the source.
    නැත්නම් උබ හිතුවද ඉර්දියෙන් මේ විස්තර පහල වුනා කියලා.
    මෙච්චර කියලත් තේරෙන්නේ නැත්නම් ඉතිං :baffled:🙏
    පුර්ව ළමා විය හරියට සංවර්දනය උනේ නැති උනාම නම් මේ වගේ වගේ cases එනවා .

    FYI -
    "reading comprehension disorder"
     
    Last edited:

    Don GasCan

    Well-known member
  • Nov 3, 2010
    43,701
    50,074
    113
    සේදවත්ත
    දකුනු ආසියාවේ යුධ විසාරදයන් මෙතන වැහි වැහැලනේ. එක්කෝ ඉන්න්න ඔනේ කියෙව් වල නැත්තම් මොස්කව් වල. හැබැයි ඉන්නේ එලකිරියේ .
     

    redux

    Well-known member
  • Feb 19, 2017
    10,978
    18,123
    113
    උබ ඉවරයි දැන් මේකේ.
    රුසියාවට තියා හිමවත් නොදැක්ක මිනිස්සු තමා රුසියාවේ උන්ගේ ගුණ වයන්නේ . ඇත්ත රුසියන් කාරයෝ වගේම කඩප්පුලි ජාතියක් තාමා ලංකාවේ ඉන්නේ එකයි රුසියන් සැම්පලේට අපේ උන් කැමති . උන්ගේ ජීවන ක්‍රමය සහ අපේ ජීවන ක්‍රමය බොහෝවිට සමානයි .
    බොනව
    උකනවා
    කුනුහරප
    යුධමානසිකත්වය
    සොරා කෑම
    වලත්ත වැඩ කිරීම
    දූශණය
    එකාධිපති භාවය

    අපේ උන් වගේම තමා. උන්ට තෙල් ගෑස් තියන නිසා ඔය දියුණුවක් ලබලා තියනවා නැත්තම් එකත් නෑ
    අම්මෝ ඒක තමය් නේත. බලන්නකෝ මේ පර රුසියන් කාරයෝන්ගෙය් ලංකාවේ උන්ගෙය් තියෙන යුධ මානසිකත්වේ. ලෝකෙ වටේ රුසියාවය් ලන්කාවය් මිලිටරි බේස් ගහගෙන අපේ නිදහස, ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍රවාදය අගයන සුදු මහත්තුරුන්ට අඩන්තේට්ටම් කරනව.:cry:

    us-military-bases-around-the-world-v0-hq2sp7atgxa91.jpg
     

    Omega_Jay

    Well-known member
  • Jul 16, 2017
    3,162
    1,708
    113
    ඩොටේ ¯\(°_o)/¯
    අම්මෝ ඒක තමය් නේත. බලන්නකෝ මේ පර රුසියන් කාරයෝන්ගෙය් ලංකාවේ උන්ගෙය් තියෙන යුධ මානසිකත්වේ. ලෝකෙ වටේ රුසියාවය් ලන්කාවය් මිලිටරි බේස් ගහගෙන අපේ නිදහස, ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍රවාදය අගයන සුදු මහත්තුරුන්ට අඩන්තේට්ටම් කරනව.:cry:

    us-military-bases-around-the-world-v0-hq2sp7atgxa91.jpg
    a1dZdv8_700b.jpg


    😂😂
     

    Edward Kenway

    Well-known member
  • Jan 8, 2015
    12,658
    14,283
    113
    They spent two three trillion dollars and a great deal of human suffering over 20 years to overthrow the Taliban's illegitimate government in Afghanistan, only to hand the country back to the same illegitimate Taliban government. further, they permitted China, their main economic rival, to become the new Afghan government's largest partner and access the nation's untapped resources. very nice move ..:rofl::rofl:

    Learn from Russia :lol: You should study how Russians permanently pacified Chechnya during the second Chechen war and motivate them to fight alongside Russians in the Ukraine war.


    Nobody knows Russia's military objectives and their time lines, then how can you say they failed? What happened in Kiev, by the way?

    Comparing Chechnya which is right next to Russia and Afghanistan which is on the other side of the world? :rofl:

    Nobody knows? LOL Putin's stated objective was to demilitarize Ukraine. Have they done that? :lol:

    බංකලොත් තර්ක කියන්නේ මේවට තමයි.
    Ukarain උන්ට දීලා තියෙන්නේ කියලා මම කොහොමද උබට පැහැදිලි කරලා දෙන්න ඕනේ.
    උන්ට හම්බ උන weapon type එකේ details and එක confirm කර ගන්න ඕනේ news source එක්කම දීලා තියෙනවා.
    යුද පෙරමුණේ ඉන්න එකෙක් වත් ඇවිල්ලා මේක සරල සිංහලෙන් මේ මනුස්සයට කියලා දීපං දෙයියනේ.





    How does this look to you? in case If you don't understand Sinhala, I have already provided the details of what these සෝ-called cutting-edge weapons were received by Ukraine.
    Kindly refer to the above post to avoid such misunderstanding at your earliest convenience.

    මේ හෑලි නෙවෙයි පුතා, facts with the source.
    නැත්නම් උබ හිතුවද ඉර්දියෙන් මේ විස්තර පහල වුනා කියලා.
    මෙච්චර කියලත් තේරෙන්නේ නැත්නම් ඉතිං :baffled:🙏
    පුර්ව ළමා විය හරියට සංවර්දනය උනේ නැති උනාම නම් මේ වගේ වගේ cases එනවා .

    FYI -
    "reading comprehension disorder"

    උඹට තාම කියාගන්න බැරි වෙලානේ තටමන්නේ. වෙලාවකට කියනවා තියන ඔක්කොම weapons දීලලු අනික් අතට sanctions විතරයි කියල හිනා වෙනවා. :rofl:

    ඔච්චර වටේ යන්න දෙයක් නෑ උඹේ මතයට අනුව cutting edge weapons දීලද?

    ඔව්/නෑ
     

    Dr.Sheldon_Suprakata

    Well-known member
  • Feb 7, 2018
    5,711
    1
    14,277
    113
    Comparing Chechnya which is right next to Russia and Afghanistan which is on the other side of the world? :rofl:

    Nobody knows? LOL Putin's stated objective was to demilitarize Ukraine. Have they done that? :lol:



    උඹට තාම කියාගන්න බැරි වෙලානේ තටමන්නේ. වෙලාවකට කියනවා තියන ඔක්කොම weapons දීලලු අනික් අතට sanctions විතරයි කියල හිනා වෙනවා. :rofl:

    ඔච්චර වටේ යන්න දෙයක් නෑ උඹේ මතයට අනුව cutting edge weapons දීලද?

    ඔව්/නෑ
    ඔව් :baffled:
     

    Don GasCan

    Well-known member
  • Nov 3, 2010
    43,701
    50,074
    113
    සේදවත්ත
    අම්මෝ ඒක තමය් නේත. බලන්නකෝ මේ පර රුසියන් කාරයෝන්ගෙය් ලංකාවේ උන්ගෙය් තියෙන යුධ මානසිකත්වේ. ලෝකෙ වටේ රුසියාවය් ලන්කාවය් මිලිටරි බේස් ගහගෙන අපේ නිදහස, ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍රවාදය අගයන සුදු මහත්තුරුන්ට අඩන්තේට්ටම් කරනව.:cry:

    us-military-bases-around-the-world-v0-hq2sp7atgxa91.jpg
    රුසියන් කාරයෝ උබලට එක ගල්කටස් එකක් දුන්නද යුද්ධ කරන්න
     
    • Haha
    Reactions: Rick Sanchezz

    Dr.Sheldon_Suprakata

    Well-known member
  • Feb 7, 2018
    5,711
    1
    14,277
    113
    එකක් හරියට කියපන්කො මේවට හිනා වෙන ගමන් කියනව weapons ඔක්කොම දීලලු :rofl:

    Hammo. This is common sense bn.

    Being a moron is totally okay, but pretending to act like a fool is something more severe.

    You need help. :baffled:
     

    Miami-Vice

    Well-known member
  • Apr 19, 2010
    22,586
    14,526
    113
    අම්මෝ ඒක තමය් නේත. බලන්නකෝ මේ පර රුසියන් කාරයෝන්ගෙය් ලංකාවේ උන්ගෙය් තියෙන යුධ මානසිකත්වේ. ලෝකෙ වටේ රුසියාවය් ලන්කාවය් මිලිටරි බේස් ගහගෙන අපේ නිදහස, ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍රවාදය අගයන සුදු මහත්තුරුන්ට අඩන්තේට්ටම් කරනව.:cry:

    us-military-bases-around-the-world-v0-hq2sp7atgxa91.jpg
    :lol:
     

    siri_ayya

    Well-known member
  • Feb 1, 2022
    16,963
    1
    29,872
    113
    @siri_ayya ට අහු උනානම් පුකේ ඇරලා මරන්නේ යුක්රේන් කාරයන්ට
    හරියට උබේ නමට අප්පාට පොල්ලක් බස්සලා මැරුව වගේ නේද 🤩
     

    Rick Sanchezz

    Well-known member
  • Dec 19, 2020
    7,244
    11,157
    113
    රුසියන් කාරයෝ උබලට එක ගල්කටස් එකක් දුන්නද යුද්ධ කරන්න
    මහින්ද මහත්තයා විදුලි පුටුවෙන් බේරගන්න, අපි වෙනුවෙන් අඩු ගානේ අතක් හරි උස්සල සපෝට් එකක් දෙන්න UN එකේ හිටියේ රුසියාවයි , චිනේයි විතරයි අපේ හාමුදුරුවනේ.
    වෙන එකෙක්වත් ආවද? 😂
     
    • Haha
    Reactions: Don GasCan